On 2 June 2016 at 20:38, Rafael J. Wysocki rafael@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Rafael,
This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, to make sure they *only* use the 'index' argument to ->target_index() with the policy->freq_table.
This change allows us to remove the (duplicate) sorted-freq-table, which was added by following series:
[PATCH V2 0/2] cpufreq: Use sorted frequency tables
Which I'm not going to apply.
If this series depended on that one, please rework it.
Hi Rafael,
The first 9 patches can be applied without any dependency on the earlier series, but not the last two.
The target of this series is to make freq-table lookup faster and so most of its patches would make sense only if we are trying to solve that problem. Otherwise they may not be required at all.
I hope that you will be replying to the earlier series [1] as well, to convey the concerns you have with it.
Thanks
-- viresh
[1] [PATCH V2 0/2] cpufreq: Use sorted frequency tables