4 Feb
2015
4 Feb
'15
6:18 a.m.
On 3 February 2015 at 20:34, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
No, it won't be the same. The per-CPU memory is special.
The general idea of the existing code is sane in my view. It connects the fallback policy information with the given CPU directly, which generally is a good idea. Storing that information in the per-CPU memory isn't a good idea, however.
Okay, will see what can be done.