On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
I think you haven't missed any of them.
That said, you need to do this in patch [1/2], or the kernel between patches [1/2] and [2/2] may be broken on some systems.
If you want to do that in separate patches, the current [2/2] should be [1/2] and vice versa.
I guess they will apply in the reverse order?
No, definition of CPUFREQ_SKIP_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK would be missing then after the first patch..
Anyway, I have fixed that and resent them now..