Em Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:30:18AM +0000, Will Deacon escreveu:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:27:44AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
- Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
This needs to go via the perf tree to avoid a repeat of the mess last time.
If the tooling bits are fine with Arnaldo then I have no objections either - once all the bits are acked please send a single series with all 4(?) patches in it, for tip:perf/core inclusion.
I think it's just 1 patch -- the other 3 are under arch/arm64, so it would be easier to take those via the arm64 tree and deal with any conflicts there.
I don't have a problem with arch specific bits, that don't touch the tools at all, going thru the respective arch git tree.
Jiri, can you see anything problematic in this? From a quick look I couldn't.
- Arnaldo