On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:29:08AM -0800, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+static int mpc_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cg) +{
- struct mpc_state *mpc = cg2mpc(cg);
- int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&mpc->lock);
- if (mpc->eventfd)
ret = -EBUSY;
cgroup_rmdir() will unregister all events for you. No need to handle it here.
- mutex_unlock(&mpc->lock);
- return ret;
+}
+static int mpc_register_level_event(struct cgroup *cg, struct cftype *cft,
struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd,
const char *args)
+{
- struct mpc_state *mpc = cg2mpc(cg);
- int i;
- int ret;
- mutex_lock(&mpc->lock);
- /*
* It's easy to implement multiple thresholds, but so far we don't
* need it.
*/
- if (mpc->eventfd) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
- }
One user which listen for one threashold per cgroup? I think it's wrong. It's essensial for API to serve multiple users.
- ret = -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < VMPRESSURE_NUM_LEVELS; i++) {
if (strcmp(vmpressure_str_levels[i], args))
continue;
mpc->eventfd = eventfd;
mpc->thres = i;
ret = 0;
break;
- }
+out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&mpc->lock);
- return ret;
+}