Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki rafael@kernel.org wrote:

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:

So IMO all of the callers should be made clamp the target frequency between min and max and those checks should be dropped from the low-level helpers.

Okay, so doing this from all these very low level helpers can be avoided by moving them to cpufreq_frequency_table_target() at least for now.

Later on we can see on how we can update the callers and see how it works best.

Thanks for the review.

-- viresh