Viresh,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:14:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
That will be used by later patches to iterate over all cpufreq cooling devices.
Can you please refresh the series on top of latest Linus tree (material for 3.18-rc7) ?
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index ddb97aa..f76a665 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -66,8 +66,11 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { unsigned int cpufreq_val; unsigned int max_level; struct cpumask allowed_cpus;
- struct list_head head;
Yadwinder has already introduced a list of cpu cooling devs: commit 2dcd851fe4b4fe60c2f8520bf7668d7e9b2dd76b Author: Yadwinder Singh Brar yadi.brar@samsung.com Date: Fri Nov 7 19:12:29 2014 +0530
thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with thermal constraints
};
static DEFINE_IDR(cpufreq_idr); +static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_dev_list); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cooling_cpufreq_lock); static unsigned int cpufreq_dev_count; @@ -372,6 +375,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, goto remove_idr; cpufreq_dev->cool_dev = cool_dev;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpufreq_dev->head);
mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); @@ -381,6 +385,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); cpufreq_dev_count++;
- list_add(&cpufreq_dev->head, &cpufreq_dev_list); mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock);
return cool_dev; @@ -451,6 +456,7 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) cpufreq_dev = cdev->devdata; mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); cpufreq_dev_count--;
- list_del(&cpufreq_dev->head);
/* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */ if (cpufreq_dev_count == 0) -- 2.0.3.693.g996b0fd