20 Dec
2013
20 Dec
'13
4:02 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:10:02PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I merged the previous one (should be in -next as of last night), I guess it's the same since the patch doesn't have a version number. But I
It's the same patch, I was resending it because it had been a while with no response.
wonder whether uses of cmpxchg without checking the return value are sane.
IIRC it was used as part of another macro which did have some reasonable uses without checking the return value.