CPUFreq drivers today support ->get(cpu) callback, which returns current clock rate of the CPU. The problem with ->get() is that it takes cpu number as parameter and this unnecessarily makes things complex.
Firstly the core gets the cpu number by doing operation 'policy->cpu' on the policy and then many drivers need to get the policy back and so do cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) on the cpu passed as argument to ->get().
It would be better if we pass them 'policy' directly and drivers can use policy->cpu if that's all they need.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++----------- drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 9 +++++++-- drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 5 ++--- drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 6 +++--- drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 7 ++++++- drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 7 ++++++- drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c | 6 +++--- drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c | 3 ++- drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 5 +++-- drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++-- 38 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index 15b921a9248c..651a8c7e27ef 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -366,26 +366,19 @@ get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data) return cmd.val; }
-static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data; - struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data; unsigned int freq; unsigned int cached_freq;
- pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu); - - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); - if (unlikely(!policy)) - return 0; + pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", policy->cpu);
- data = policy->driver_data; - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); if (unlikely(!data || !data->freq_table)) return 0;
cached_freq = data->freq_table[to_perf_data(data)->state].frequency; - freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu), data), data); + freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(policy->cpu), data), data); if (freq != cached_freq) { /* * The dreaded BIOS frequency change behind our back. diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c index f1e42f8ce0fc..a9bd87f77d53 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static unsigned int clk_get_cpu_rate(unsigned int cpu) return rate; }
-static unsigned int bL_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) +static inline unsigned int __bL_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) { if (is_bL_switching_enabled()) { pr_debug("%s: freq: %d\n", __func__, per_cpu(cpu_last_req_freq, @@ -125,6 +125,11 @@ static unsigned int bL_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) } }
+static unsigned int bL_cpufreq_get_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + return __bL_cpufreq_get_rate(policy->cpu); +} + static unsigned int bL_cpufreq_set_rate(u32 cpu, u32 old_cluster, u32 new_cluster, u32 rate) { @@ -196,7 +201,7 @@ bL_cpufreq_set_rate(u32 cpu, u32 old_cluster, u32 new_cluster, u32 rate) * be reading only the cached value anyway. This needs to be removed * once clk core is fixed. */ - if (bL_cpufreq_get_rate(cpu) != new_rate) + if (__bL_cpufreq_get_rate(cpu) != new_rate) return -EIO; return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c index a9f8e5bd0716..83dae4d990b5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void bfin_adjust_core_timer(void *info) return; }
-static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { /* Both CoreA/B have the same core clock */ return get_cclk() / 1000; @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) cycles_t cycles; #endif
- old_freq = bfin_getfreq_khz(0); + old_freq = bfin_getfreq_khz(policy); new_freq = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
#ifndef CONFIG_BF60x diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c index db69eeb501a7..fce033787bf4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c @@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ static int nforce2_set_fsb(unsigned int fsb)
/** * nforce2_get - get the CPU frequency - * @cpu: CPU number + * @policy: CPUFreq policy * * Returns the CPU frequency */ -static unsigned int nforce2_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int nforce2_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - if (cpu) + if (policy->cpu) return 0; return nforce2_fsb_read(0) * fid * 100; } @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int nforce2_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
target_fsb = target_freq / (fid * 100);
- freqs.old = nforce2_get(policy->cpu); + freqs.old = nforce2_get(policy); freqs.new = target_fsb * fid * 100;
if (freqs.old == freqs.new) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0618522d4863..485171d5c455 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -246,13 +246,11 @@ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL; }
-unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu) +unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); - - if (!policy || IS_ERR(policy->clk)) { + if (IS_ERR(policy->clk)) { pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n", - __func__, policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu); + __func__, policy ? "clk" : "policy", policy->cpu); return 0; }
@@ -587,7 +585,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) ssize_t ret;
if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get) - ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu)); + ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy)); else ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur); return ret; @@ -1279,7 +1277,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) }
if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) { - policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu); + policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy); if (!policy->cur) { pr_err("%s: ->get() failed\n", __func__); goto out_exit_policy; @@ -1540,16 +1538,18 @@ static void cpufreq_out_of_sync(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy; - unsigned int ret_freq = 0; - - if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get) - return cpufreq_driver->get(cpu); + unsigned int ret_freq;
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); - if (policy) { + if (!policy) + return 0; + + if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get) + ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy); + else ret_freq = policy->cur; - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); - } + + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
return ret_freq; } @@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (!cpufreq_driver->get) return ret_freq;
- ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu); + ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy);
/* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */ if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy))) @@ -2311,7 +2311,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) * -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change */ if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) { - new_policy.cur = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu); + new_policy.cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy); if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) { ret = -EIO; goto unlock; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c index 601b88c490cf..958722346df9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table cris_freq_table[] = { {0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END}, };
-static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl; clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c index 22b2cdde74d9..c934e64dd0e6 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table cris_freq_table[] = { {0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END}, };
-static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl; clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c index 4085244c8a67..12fcc6000a9d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c @@ -87,8 +87,9 @@ static int eps_acpi_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } #endif
-static unsigned int eps_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int eps_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; struct eps_cpu_data *centaur; u32 lo, hi;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c index 1c06e786c9ba..6a7e7123369a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table elanfreq_table[] = { * and have the rest of the chip running with 33 MHz. */
-static unsigned int elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { u8 clockspeed_reg; /* Clock Speed Register */
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int elanfreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* max freq */ if (!max_freq) - max_freq = elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(0); + max_freq = elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(policy);
/* table init */ cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, elanfreq_table) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c index 3488c9c175eb..b964f36e3891 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static struct pci_dev * __init gx_detect_chipset(void) * Finds out at which efficient frequency the Cyrix MediaGX/NatSemi * Geode CPU runs. */ -static unsigned int gx_get_cpuspeed(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int gx_get_cpuspeed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { if ((gx_params->pci_suscfg & SUSMOD) == 0) return stock_freq; @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void gx_set_cpuspeed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int khz) unsigned long flags; struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- freqs.old = gx_get_cpuspeed(0); + freqs.old = gx_get_cpuspeed(policy);
new_khz = gx_validate_speed(khz, &gx_params->on_duration, &gx_params->off_duration); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c index 0202429f1c5b..839ca045d5be 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -194,8 +194,9 @@ processor_set_freq (
static unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_get ( - unsigned int cpu) + struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + int cpu = policy->cpu; struct cpufreq_acpi_io *data = acpi_io_data[cpu];
pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_get\n"); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c index 2faa4216bf2a..72b7598867a3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c @@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ static int integrator_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return 0; }
-static unsigned int integrator_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int integrator_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; cpumask_t cpus_allowed; unsigned int current_freq; u_int cm_osc; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 7b2721fb861f..db091976f114 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -957,12 +957,12 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum) return 0; }
-static unsigned int intel_pstate_get(unsigned int cpu_num) +static unsigned int intel_pstate_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct sample *sample; struct cpudata *cpu;
- cpu = all_cpu_data[cpu_num]; + cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; if (!cpu) return 0; sample = &cpu->sample; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c index be42f103db60..c6ed1dcb5aad 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table kirkwood_freq_table[] = { {0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END}, };
-static unsigned int kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int +kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return clk_get_rate(priv.powersave_clk) / 1000; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c index 0f6b229afcb9..550ce82acda3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c @@ -667,9 +667,9 @@ static int longhaul_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, }
-static unsigned int longhaul_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int longhaul_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - if (cpu) + if (!policy->cpu) return 0; return calc_speed(longhaul_get_cpu_mult()); } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c index 074971b12635..e991a2ef5c54 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c @@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ static int longrun_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return 0; }
-static unsigned int longrun_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int longrun_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
- if (cpu) + if (policy->cpu) return 0;
cpuid(0x80860007, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c index cc3408fc073f..695bcf73a99f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int maple_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return maple_scom_switch_freq(index); }
-static unsigned int maple_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int maple_cpufreq_get_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return maple_cpu_freqs[maple_pmode_cur].frequency; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c index 5dd95dab580d..63ef660f5f52 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ enum { static int has_N44_O17_errata[NR_CPUS]; static unsigned int stock_freq; static struct cpufreq_driver p4clockmod_driver; -static unsigned int cpufreq_p4_get(unsigned int cpu);
static int cpufreq_p4_setdc(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int newstate) { @@ -215,11 +214,11 @@ static int cpufreq_p4_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) }
-static unsigned int cpufreq_p4_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int cpufreq_p4_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { u32 l, h;
- rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, &l, &h); + rdmsr_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, &l, &h);
if (l & 0x10) { l = l >> 1; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c index 2a0d58959acf..f04a042d167d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c @@ -137,8 +137,9 @@ static inline void pcc_clear_mapping(void) pcch_virt_addr = NULL; }
-static unsigned int pcc_get_freq(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int pcc_get_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; struct pcc_cpu *pcc_cpu_data; unsigned int curr_freq; unsigned int freq_limit; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c index 1f49d97a70ea..a862b4347b4e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode) return 0; }
-static unsigned int pmac_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int pmac_cpufreq_get_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return cur_freq; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c index 4ff86878727f..90d8dbf304dd 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int g5_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) return g5_switch_freq(index); }
-static unsigned int g5_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int g5_cpufreq_get_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return g5_cpu_freqs[g5_pmode_cur].frequency; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c index e6f24b281e3e..911ab1338b48 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return 0; }
-static unsigned int powernow_k6_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int powernow_k6_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { unsigned int ret; ret = (busfreq * powernow_k6_get_cpu_multiplier()); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c index c1ae1999770a..dcf13c8a41ee 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c @@ -558,12 +558,12 @@ static int fixup_sgtc(void) return sgtc; }
-static unsigned int powernow_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int powernow_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { union msr_fidvidstatus fidvidstatus; unsigned int cfid;
- if (cpu) + if (policy->cpu) return 0; rdmsrl(MSR_K7_FID_VID_STATUS, fidvidstatus.val); cfid = fidvidstatus.bits.CFID; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c index 0b5bf135b090..6db4c14f8e21 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c @@ -1137,8 +1137,9 @@ static void query_values_on_cpu(void *_err) *err = query_current_values_with_pending_wait(data); }
-static unsigned int powernowk8_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int powernowk8_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; struct powernow_k8_data *data = per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu); unsigned int khz = 0; int err; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c index 546e056e416d..d62166d83199 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c @@ -262,12 +262,12 @@ static void powernv_read_cpu_freq(void *arg) * firmware for CPU 'cpu'. This value is reported through the sysfs * file cpuinfo_cur_freq. */ -static unsigned int powernv_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int powernv_cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct powernv_smp_call_data freq_data;
- smp_call_function_any(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu), powernv_read_cpu_freq, - &freq_data, 1); + smp_call_function_any(cpu_sibling_mask(policy->cpu), + powernv_read_cpu_freq, &freq_data, 1);
return freq_data.freq; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c index 1d99c97defa9..76019cb855cb 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static u32 mdrefr_dri(unsigned int freq) return (interval - (cpu_is_pxa27x() ? 31 : 0)) / 32; }
-static unsigned int pxa_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int pxa_cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return get_clk_frequency_khz(0); } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c index a01275900389..8a9c6f831611 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void __update_bus_freq(struct pxa3xx_freq_info *info) cpu_relax(); }
-static unsigned int pxa3xx_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int pxa3xx_cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return pxa3xx_get_clk_frequency_khz(0); } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c index d6d425773fa4..5b208536e1e9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c @@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2450_freq_table[] = { { 0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END }, };
-static unsigned int s3c2416_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int s3c2416_cpufreq_get_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct s3c2416_data *s3c_freq = &s3c2416_cpufreq;
- if (cpu != 0) + if (policy->cpu != 0) return 0;
/* return our pseudo-frequency when in dvs mode */ diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c index 728eab77e8e0..c02a8a736866 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c @@ -200,11 +200,16 @@ static int __init sa1100_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, sa11x0_freq_table, CPUFREQ_ETERNAL); }
+static unsigned int sa1100_get_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + return sa11x0_getspeed(0); +} + static struct cpufreq_driver sa1100_driver __refdata = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, .target_index = sa1100_target, - .get = sa11x0_getspeed, + .get = sa1100_get_rate, .init = sa1100_cpu_init, .name = "sa1100", }; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c index b5befc211172..aa3415a4a0ac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c @@ -309,13 +309,18 @@ static int __init sa1110_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, sa11x0_freq_table, CPUFREQ_ETERNAL); }
+static unsigned int sa1110_get_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + return sa11x0_getspeed(0); +} + /* sa1110_driver needs __refdata because it must remain after init registers * it with cpufreq_register_driver() */ static struct cpufreq_driver sa1110_driver __refdata = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, .target_index = sa1110_target, - .get = sa11x0_getspeed, + .get = sa1110_get_rate, .init = sa1110_cpu_init, .name = "sa1110", }; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c index ac84e4818014..560c2aff8e03 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table sc520_freq_table[] = { {0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END}, };
-static unsigned int sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { u8 clockspeed_reg = *cpuctl;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c index 86628e22b2a3..72a5d5faefc4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clk, sh_cpuclk);
-static unsigned int sh_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int sh_cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - return (clk_get_rate(&per_cpu(sh_cpuclk, cpu)) + 500) / 1000; + return (clk_get_rate(&per_cpu(sh_cpuclk, policy->cpu)) + 500) / 1000; }
/* @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int sh_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
dev_dbg(dev, "requested frequency %u Hz\n", target_freq * 1000);
- freqs.old = sh_cpufreq_get(cpu); + freqs.old = sh_cpufreq_get(policy); freqs.new = (freq + 500) / 1000; freqs.flags = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c index b73feeb666f9..4f76453fbc11 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c @@ -229,8 +229,9 @@ static unsigned long estar_to_divisor(unsigned long estar) return ret; }
-static unsigned int us2e_freq_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int us2e_freq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; cpumask_t cpus_allowed; unsigned long clock_tick, estar;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c index 9bb42ba50efa..c619cfb5ab9e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c @@ -76,8 +76,9 @@ static unsigned long get_current_freq(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long safari_cfg return ret; }
-static unsigned int us3_freq_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int us3_freq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; cpumask_t cpus_allowed; unsigned long reg; unsigned int ret; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c index 7d4a31571608..eddb7fff3daf 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c @@ -318,8 +318,9 @@ static unsigned extract_clock(unsigned msr, unsigned int cpu, int failsafe) }
/* Return the current CPU frequency in kHz */ -static unsigned int get_cur_freq(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int get_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; unsigned l, h; unsigned clock_freq;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c index 37555c6b86a7..4f5dc1fad4d9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c @@ -236,12 +236,13 @@ static void get_freq_data(void *_speed) *speed = speedstep_get_frequency(speedstep_processor); }
-static unsigned int speedstep_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int speedstep_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { unsigned int speed;
/* You're supposed to ensure CPU is online. */ - if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, get_freq_data, &speed, 1) != 0) + if (smp_call_function_single(policy->cpu, get_freq_data, &speed, 1) != + 0) BUG();
pr_debug("detected %u kHz as current frequency\n", speed); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c index 819229e824fb..bb2c963c0ddc 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c @@ -269,9 +269,9 @@ static int speedstep_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, speedstep_freqs); }
-static unsigned int speedstep_get(unsigned int cpu) +static unsigned int speedstep_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - if (cpu) + if (policy->cpu) return -ENODEV; return speedstep_get_frequency(speedstep_processor); } diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index bde1e567b3a9..89b9e21c7640 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver { unsigned int index);
/* should be defined, if possible */ - unsigned int (*get)(unsigned int cpu); + unsigned int (*get)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/* optional */ int (*bios_limit)(int cpu, unsigned int *limit); @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ extern struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[]; int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
-unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu); +unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table, unsigned int transition_latency);
On 31-07-15, 16:14, Viresh Kumar wrote:
CPUFreq drivers today support ->get(cpu) callback, which returns current clock rate of the CPU. The problem with ->get() is that it takes cpu number as parameter and this unnecessarily makes things complex.
Firstly the core gets the cpu number by doing operation 'policy->cpu' on the policy and then many drivers need to get the policy back and so do cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) on the cpu passed as argument to ->get().
It would be better if we pass them 'policy' directly and drivers can use policy->cpu if that's all they need.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Is this getting moved to 4.4?
On Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:15:45 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31-07-15, 16:14, Viresh Kumar wrote:
CPUFreq drivers today support ->get(cpu) callback, which returns current clock rate of the CPU. The problem with ->get() is that it takes cpu number as parameter and this unnecessarily makes things complex.
Firstly the core gets the cpu number by doing operation 'policy->cpu' on the policy and then many drivers need to get the policy back and so do cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) on the cpu passed as argument to ->get().
It would be better if we pass them 'policy' directly and drivers can use policy->cpu if that's all they need.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Is this getting moved to 4.4?
I'm really unsure about this change at all.
I have a concern that it may not go in the right direction. I'll say more about that later today.
Thanks, Rafael
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:14:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
CPUFreq drivers today support ->get(cpu) callback, which returns current clock rate of the CPU. The problem with ->get() is that it takes cpu number as parameter and this unnecessarily makes things complex.
Firstly the core gets the cpu number by doing operation 'policy->cpu' on the policy and then many drivers
I see one. That unfortunately is the acpi-cpufreq driver, but it still is one.
Well, cpufreq_generic_get() does _get_raw(), so I suppose acpi-cpufreq may do that too?
need to get the policy back and so do cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) on the cpu passed as argument to ->get().
It would be better if we pass them 'policy' directly and drivers can use policy->cpu if that's all they need.
Passing a pointer and dereferencing it is generally less efficient than passing a number. Before the patch the core has to do the dereference before calling ->get, so it likely doesn't matter here, but the code churn from this change is quite substantial and the benefit from it is in the noise IMO.
Overall, we need to talk about the design aspect of cpufreq, because there are much more significant issues in it than things like this one.
Thanks, Rafael
On 10-09-15, 03:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I see one. That unfortunately is the acpi-cpufreq driver, but it still is one.
Hmm..
Well, cpufreq_generic_get() does _get_raw(), so I suppose acpi-cpufreq may do that too?
Yeah, it can.
need to get the policy back and so do cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) on the cpu passed as argument to ->get().
It would be better if we pass them 'policy' directly and drivers can use policy->cpu if that's all they need.
Passing a pointer and dereferencing it is generally less efficient than passing a number. Before the patch the core has to do the dereference before calling ->get, so it likely doesn't matter here, but the code churn from this change is quite substantial and the benefit from it is in the noise IMO.
Hmm.. Actually almost every other callback (bios_limit() is another one), passes the policy to the driver, and I thought always passing the policy will make it more symmetrical. And the expectation that the cpufreq drivers wouldn't need to use policy from the ->get() callback would be wrong. Even if there are only few users today. One is the acpi-cpufreq driver and others are the ones, that are using cpufreq_generic_get() :)
Overall, we need to talk about the design aspect of cpufreq, because there are much more significant issues in it than things like this one.
I agree.
On Thursday, September 10, 2015 06:52:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 10-09-15, 03:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I see one. That unfortunately is the acpi-cpufreq driver, but it still is one.
Hmm..
Well, cpufreq_generic_get() does _get_raw(), so I suppose acpi-cpufreq may do that too?
Yeah, it can.
OK, so let's make that change.
BTW, I wonder how much of the stuff in cpufreq.h can be moved to a local header under drivers/cpufreq/. It looks like the majority of it is not used by anybody else.
--- From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Subject: cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() in ->get()
cpufreq_cpu_get() called by get_cur_freq_on_cpu() is overkill, because the ->get() callback is always invoked in a context in which all of the conditions checked by cpufreq_cpu_get() are guaranteed to be satisfied.
Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of it and drop the corresponding cpufreq_cpu_put() from get_cur_freq_on_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com --- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 3 +-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -375,12 +375,11 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(
pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); if (unlikely(!policy)) return 0;
data = policy->driver_data; - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); if (unlikely(!data || !data->freq_table)) return 0;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -238,13 +238,13 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_ } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init);
-/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw);
unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu) { Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -129,9 +129,14 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { #define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY (3) /* Freq can be set from any dependent CPU*/
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ +struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu); struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu); void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); #else +static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return NULL; +} static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu) { return NULL;
On 10-09-15, 23:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
BTW, I wonder how much of the stuff in cpufreq.h can be moved to a local header under drivers/cpufreq/. It looks like the majority of it is not used by anybody else.
Okay, will check that out and do some cleanup.
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Subject: cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() in ->get()
cpufreq_cpu_get() called by get_cur_freq_on_cpu() is overkill, because the ->get() callback is always invoked in a context in which all of the conditions checked by cpufreq_cpu_get() are guaranteed to be satisfied.
Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of it and drop the corresponding cpufreq_cpu_put() from get_cur_freq_on_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 3 +-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -375,12 +375,11 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu( pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); if (unlikely(!policy)) return 0;
data = policy->driver_data;
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); if (unlikely(!data || !data->freq_table)) return 0;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -238,13 +238,13 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_ } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init); -/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw); unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu) { Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -129,9 +129,14 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { #define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY (3) /* Freq can be set from any dependent CPU*/ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ +struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu); struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu); void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); #else +static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) +{
- return NULL;
+} static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu) { return NULL;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
On 11-09-15, 21:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
-/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw);
This routine was recently marked as static and now with your patch it results in compilation error. You just need to remove the 'static' part from the routine.
I would have sent a patch for this, but I thought you would like to edit the original patch itself to not break git bisect.
On 15-09-15, 13:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I would have sent a patch for this, but I thought you would like to edit the original patch itself to not break git bisect.
But in case you are applying it separately, here is the fix.
-------------------------8<-------------------------
From: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:09:54 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't a static function anymore
Its used outside of the core file and is exported as well. Drop the 'static' keyword from its declaration and fix below build error:
linux/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:241:31: error: static declaration of 'cpufreq_cpu_get_raw' follows non-static declaration
Fixes: 503655f70d9b ("cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() in ->get()") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index a8252bb0f80c..ef5ed9470de9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init);
-static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) +struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 01:09:21 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 11-09-15, 21:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
-/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw);
This routine was recently marked as static and now with your patch it results in compilation error. You just need to remove the 'static' part from the routine.
I would have sent a patch for this, but I thought you would like to edit the original patch itself to not break git bisect.
I even tried to do that previously, but I made a mistake then.
It should be fixed in my bleeding-edge branch now.
Thanks, Rafael
On Thursday, September 10, 2015 06:52:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 10-09-15, 03:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[cut]
Passing a pointer and dereferencing it is generally less efficient than passing a number. Before the patch the core has to do the dereference before calling ->get, so it likely doesn't matter here, but the code churn from this change is quite substantial and the benefit from it is in the noise IMO.
Hmm.. Actually almost every other callback (bios_limit() is another one), passes the policy to the driver, and I thought always passing the policy will make it more symmetrical. And the expectation that the cpufreq drivers wouldn't need to use policy from the ->get() callback would be wrong. Even if there are only few users today. One is the acpi-cpufreq driver and others are the ones, that are using cpufreq_generic_get() :)
So the whole question is whether or not this is worth the whole code churn related to the exchange of callbacks.
At this point I really don't know. It depends on the design discussion I'd like to start.
Thanks, Rafael
On Thursday, September 10, 2015 06:52:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 10-09-15, 03:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[cut]
Overall, we need to talk about the design aspect of cpufreq, because there are much more significant issues in it than things like this one.
I agree.
OK
Adding Mark and Srinivas who may be interested in this to CC.
Why don't we start with listing all of the cpufreq's shortcomings we'd like to address, then try to sort out conflicting items and come up with a list of tasks to complete?
To me, the most painful thing ATM is that cpufreq cannot use timer functions to carry out state transitions even if the underlying driver could request state to be changed from interrupt context. IMO, we should utilize the capabilities of the hardware where possible and only add overhead where it is necessary.
Speaking of which I'm concerned that we're adding overhead for systems that don't need software synchronization of state transitions (the "one CPU per policy" case). I'm not sure how much of that is really happening, but it would be review the code from that angle and streamline things where policy objects are not shared.
The locking is overdesigned and overkill (and you know that already), but if we do the above, it'll be more strarightforward to simplify it IMO.
Finally, the initialization is questionable and in particular the fact that we need to call the driver's ->init at least once to get policy->cpus populated. This shouldn't be necessary, as that information reflects the topology of the system and shouldn't depend on which driver is in use really.
Please let me know what your pain points are. :-)
Thanks, Rafael
On 10-09-15, 23:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Adding Mark and Srinivas who may be interested in this to CC.
Mike ? :)
Why don't we start with listing all of the cpufreq's shortcomings we'd like to address, then try to sort out conflicting items and come up with a list of tasks to complete?
Yeah, sounds like a good plan.
To me, the most painful thing ATM is that cpufreq cannot use timer functions to carry out state transitions even if the underlying driver could request state to be changed from interrupt context. IMO, we should utilize the capabilities of the hardware where possible and only add overhead where it is necessary.
Absolutely right.
Speaking of which I'm concerned that we're adding overhead for systems that don't need software synchronization of state transitions (the "one CPU per policy" case). I'm not sure how much of that is really happening, but it would be review the code from that angle and streamline things where policy objects are not shared.
Maybe, maybe not.. Probably we need to look at exact code paths for that and then decide.. But we should get this simplified if we can.
The locking is overdesigned and overkill (and you know that already), but if we do the above, it'll be more strarightforward to simplify it IMO.
Locking is really bad today.. I wrote lots of patches for that, but never got them upstreamed. I should try doing that after pushing the remaining govenor patches ..
Finally, the initialization is questionable and in particular the fact that we need to call the driver's ->init at least once to get policy->cpus populated. This shouldn't be necessary, as that information reflects the topology of the system and shouldn't depend on which driver is in use really.
I am not sure how feasible it will be get the topology information in a generic way, but if we can, we should.
Please let me know what your pain points are. :-)
There were few minor things as well, I already have some code for them: - Dividing the really large cpufreq.[h|c] files into better, more readable blocks. For example, one file for sysfs stuff alone.. - Some sort of test suite for cpufreq. I wrote one, which contains most of the cases, which helped us fixing governor races:
https://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/cpufreq-tests.git
But, these are plain bash scripts. Not really tied to any kernel internal test suite. Which suite should I adapt them for ?
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 01:24:31 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 10-09-15, 23:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Adding Mark and Srinivas who may be interested in this to CC.
Mike ? :)Why don't we start with listing all of the cpufreq's shortcomings we'd like to address, then try to sort out conflicting items and come up with a list of tasks to complete?
Yeah, sounds like a good plan.
To me, the most painful thing ATM is that cpufreq cannot use timer functions to carry out state transitions even if the underlying driver could request state to be changed from interrupt context. IMO, we should utilize the capabilities of the hardware where possible and only add overhead where it is necessary.
Absolutely right.
Speaking of which I'm concerned that we're adding overhead for systems that don't need software synchronization of state transitions (the "one CPU per policy" case). I'm not sure how much of that is really happening, but it would be review the code from that angle and streamline things where policy objects are not shared.
Maybe, maybe not.. Probably we need to look at exact code paths for that and then decide.. But we should get this simplified if we can.
The locking is overdesigned and overkill (and you know that already), but if we do the above, it'll be more strarightforward to simplify it IMO.
Locking is really bad today.. I wrote lots of patches for that, but never got them upstreamed. I should try doing that after pushing the remaining govenor patches ..
Finally, the initialization is questionable and in particular the fact that we need to call the driver's ->init at least once to get policy->cpus populated. This shouldn't be necessary, as that information reflects the topology of the system and shouldn't depend on which driver is in use really.
I am not sure how feasible it will be get the topology information in a generic way, but if we can, we should.
That depends on what you mean by "generic". I don't think there's one that will work for all platforms, but I don't see a reason why it should depend on the cpufreq driver.
cpufreq drivers can use DT or ACPI or OPPs provided by the platform for that and all of those things can be accessed by the cpufreq core itself just as well.
Please let me know what your pain points are. :-)
There were few minor things as well, I already have some code for them:
- Dividing the really large cpufreq.[h|c] files into better, more readable blocks. For example, one file for sysfs stuff alone..
Yeah, that's worth doing, but maybe in the process of re-working things to avoid making significant changes depend on cleanups.
Speaking of sysfs, that's one more item for my list. The structure of the sysfs interface used by cpufreq today is confusing to put it lightly.
For example, we need to make the information that multiple CPUs share the same cpufreq settings more explicit and I really don't think we should fail sysfs accesses for offline CPUs when it is not necessary. At least, we should fail it for all of them or for none of them, but we don't do that.
Some sort of test suite for cpufreq. I wrote one, which contains most of the cases, which helped us fixing governor races:
https://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/cpufreq-tests.git
But, these are plain bash scripts. Not really tied to any kernel internal test suite. Which suite should I adapt them for ?
kselftest seems to be a reasonable target to me.
Thanks, Rafael
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
-
Rafael J. Wysocki -
Viresh Kumar