Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 05c0e7c789df..9799e9d2e222 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -414,3 +414,5 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y +CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
On 31 August 2014 17:39, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 05c0e7c789df..9799e9d2e222 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -414,3 +414,5 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y +CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
On Monday 01 September 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31 August 2014 17:39, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Applied to next/defconfig, thanks!
Arnd
On Sunday 31 August 2014 13:09:39 Mark Brown wrote:
Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
Do we need this in 3.17, or should it go in during the merge window?
Arnd
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:41:01AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2014 13:09:39 Mark Brown wrote:
Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
Do we need this in 3.17, or should it go in during the merge window?
It's not a bug fix; it'd be nice to have it there from the point of view of some testing I'm doing on the defconfig and it should be safe but it's not a regression or anything.
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
-
Arnd Bergmann -
Mark Brown -
Viresh Kumar