Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro 11.10 release?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.orgwrote:
Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro 11.10 release?
According to the latest weather forecast, this should be a 3.1 based kernel.
really? is that true for Ubuntu LEB as well? Andy/Ricardo?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas n-dechesne@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro 11.10 release?
According to the latest weather forecast, this should be a 3.1 based kernel.
really? is that true for Ubuntu LEB as well? Andy/Ricardo?
In theory the LT kernels should all follow the Linux Linaro release, but for TILT I believe it depends on what Andy will have until the end of the cycle.
Cheers,
On 10/18/2011 12:23 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Dechesne, Nicolasn-dechesne@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Nicolas Pitrenicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro 11.10 release?
According to the latest weather forecast, this should be a 3.1 based kernel.
really? is that true for Ubuntu LEB as well? Andy/Ricardo?
In theory the LT kernels should all follow the Linux Linaro release, but for TILT I believe it depends on what Andy will have until the end of the cycle.
We have working tilt-linux-linaro-3.0 and -3.1 for a little while now, along with vanilla and android flavours and tracking, so we're set for whatever people want.
I think maybe Nicolas is surprised because Canonical Ubuntu stuff will stay on 3.0, but I think it's better if Linaro Ubuntu packaged builds move on as soon as possible and / or all have tracking-based hwpack option.
Tracking-based build for Android has been a success and it reduces the demand for wasteful backport effort to old releases if the fixed tracking build is available too.
-Andy
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Andy Green andy.green@linaro.org wrote:
We have working tilt-linux-linaro-3.0 and -3.1 for a little while now, along with vanilla and android flavours and tracking, so we're set for whatever people want.
I think maybe Nicolas is surprised because Canonical Ubuntu stuff will stay on 3.0, but I think it's better if Linaro Ubuntu packaged builds move on as soon as possible and / or all have tracking-based hwpack option.
actually i was surprised for a different reason ;-) i thought we had issues with 3.1 kernel, and I didn't know they were fixed ! I am all for 3.1 asap. yes canonical/ubuntu will stay on 3.0, but i want to move to 3.1 asap (and 3.2 later on) in the TI or Linaro overlay. so i am good.
Tracking-based build for Android has been a success and it reduces the demand for wasteful backport effort to old releases if the fixed tracking build is available too.
Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release:
Tracking Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+
Staging Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence)
Beagle xM, Beagle, Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9-09767-g52e3db9
Staging Snowball Linux version 3.0.4-g7118ded
Landing Snowball Linux version 3.0.0-rc7-g2036fd7
Staging Origen Linux version 3.0.4-01826-gd24a797
Staging iMX53 Linux version 2.6.38.7+
On 17 October 2011 06:26, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) jon.medhurst@linaro.org wrote:
Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro 11.10 release?
-- Tixy
linaro-kernel mailing list linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 17:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release:
Tracking Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+
Staging Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence)
Beagle xM, Beagle, Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9-09767-g52e3db9
Staging Snowball Linux version 3.0.4-g7118ded
...
Staging Origen Linux version 3.0.4-01826-gd24a797
Staging iMX53 Linux version 2.6.38.7+
Any reason why the Snowball/Origen kernel's won't be up-reved to the current 3.1 based linaro-android branch for 11.10?
I realize it may be non-trivial to rebase the work within the remaining time, and that's fine, I just want to see what we can do to make similar major kernel bumps in the future go more smoothly.
thanks -john
On 17 October 2011 18:22, john stultz johnstul@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 17:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release:
Tracking Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+
Staging Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence)
Beagle xM, Beagle, Panda Linux version 3.1.0-rc9-09767-g52e3db9
Staging Snowball Linux version 3.0.4-g7118ded
...
Staging Origen Linux version 3.0.4-01826-gd24a797
Staging iMX53 Linux version 2.6.38.7+
Any reason why the Snowball/Origen kernel's won't be up-reved to the current 3.1 based linaro-android branch for 11.10?
I believe that Mathieu and Angus are working on it for Snowball and Origen respectively. Adding them.
I realize it may be non-trivial to rebase the work within the remaining time, and that's fine, I just want to see what we can do to make similar major kernel bumps in the future go more smoothly.
thanks -john
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
-
Andy Green -
Dechesne, Nicolas -
john stultz -
Jon Medhurst (Tixy) -
Nicolas Pitre -
Ricardo Salveti -
Zach Pfeffer