Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
Depends on: - next-20140804 branch of linux-next kernel tree - [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html) - [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
Changes since v4: - rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html) - call exynos_save_cp15() only on A9 type core (this is needed for the future Exynos3250 SoC support)
Changes since v3: - rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v4][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35192.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html) - (re-)added patch fixing S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION register setup
Changes since v2: - rebased on top of next-20140708 + [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequencies (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32809.html) [with rejects fixed] [PATCH 6/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Register cpuidle device only on Exynos4210 and 5250 (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32808.html) [PATCH 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32991.html) [with rejects fixed in patch #2] - addressed review comments from Tomasz Figa and Daniel Lezcano
Changes since v1: - synced against next-20140602 - added missing Acked-by-s
Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (5): ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines ARM: EXYNOS: add AFTR mode support to firmware do_idle method ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: add secure firmware support to AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: PM: fix register setup for AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: allow driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs
arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 ++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR and EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG macros by exynos_boot_vector_addr() and exynos_boot_vector_flag() static inlines.
This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.park@samsung.com Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c index 454c1cc..78e50ed 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c @@ -101,16 +101,23 @@ static int exynos_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int state) return -ENOENT; }
-#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \ - pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM7 : \ - (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \ - (sysram_base_addr + 0x24) : \ - pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM0)) -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \ - pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM6 : \ - (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \ - (sysram_base_addr + 0x20) : \ - pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM1)) +static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void) +{ + if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1) + return pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM7; + else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0) + return sysram_base_addr + 0x24; + return pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM0; +} + +static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_flag(void) +{ + if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1) + return pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM6; + else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0) + return sysram_base_addr + 0x20; + return pmu_base_addr + S5P_INFORM1; +}
#define S5P_CHECK_AFTR 0xFCBA0D10 #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD @@ -195,8 +202,9 @@ static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask)
static void exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector(long flags) { - __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume), EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR); - __raw_writel(flags, EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG); + __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume), + exynos_boot_vector_addr()); + __raw_writel(flags, exynos_boot_vector_flag()); }
static int exynos_aftr_finisher(unsigned long flags)
On some platforms (i.e. EXYNOS ones) more than one idle mode is available and we need to distinguish them in firmware do_idle method.
Add mode parameter to do_idle firmware method and AFTR mode support to EXYNOS do_idle implementation.
This change is a preparation for adding secure firmware support to EXYNOS cpuidle driver.
This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes (please note that do_idle firmware method is unused currently).
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.park@samsung.com --- arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 +++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 10 ++++++++-- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h index 5904f59..89aefe1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct firmware_ops { /* * Enters CPU idle mode */ - int (*do_idle)(void); + int (*do_idle)(unsigned long mode); /* * Sets boot address of specified physical CPU */ diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h index c218200..2d830df 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h @@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ extern void __iomem *sysram_base_addr; extern void __iomem *pmu_base_addr; void exynos_sysram_init(void);
+enum { + FW_DO_IDLE_SLEEP, + FW_DO_IDLE_AFTR, +}; + void exynos_firmware_init(void);
extern u32 exynos_get_eint_wake_mask(void); diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c index f5e626d..e57b7c3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c @@ -28,9 +28,15 @@ #define EXYNOS_BOOT_ADDR 0x8 #define EXYNOS_BOOT_FLAG 0xc
-static int exynos_do_idle(void) +static int exynos_do_idle(unsigned long mode) { - exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_SLEEP, 0, 0, 0); + switch (mode) { + case FW_DO_IDLE_AFTR: + exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU0AFTR, 0, 0, 0); + break; + case FW_DO_IDLE_SLEEP: + exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_SLEEP, 0, 0, 0); + } return 0; }
* Move cp15 registers saving to exynos_save_cp15() helper and add additional helper usage to do_idle firmware method.
* Use resume firmware method instead of exynos_cpu_restore_register() and skip exynos_cpu_save_register() on boards with secure firmware enabled.
* Use sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x24/0x20 addresses instead of the default ones used by exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector() on boards with secure firmware enabled.
* Use do_idle firmware method instead of cpu_do_idle() on boards with secure firmware enabled.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.park@samsung.com --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c index e57b7c3..2c5bc6b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c @@ -25,13 +25,28 @@ #include "smc.h"
#define EXYNOS_SLEEP_MAGIC 0x00000bad +#define EXYNOS_AFTR_MAGIC 0xfcba0d10 #define EXYNOS_BOOT_ADDR 0x8 #define EXYNOS_BOOT_FLAG 0xc
+static void exynos_save_cp15(void) +{ + /* Save Power control and Diagnostic registers */ + asm ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c15, c0, 0\n" + "mrc p15, 0, %1, c15, c0, 1\n" + : "=r" (cp15_save_power), "=r" (cp15_save_diag) + : : "cc"); +} + static int exynos_do_idle(unsigned long mode) { switch (mode) { case FW_DO_IDLE_AFTR: + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) + exynos_save_cp15(); + __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume_ns), + sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x24); + __raw_writel(EXYNOS_AFTR_MAGIC, sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x20); exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU0AFTR, 0, 0, 0); break; case FW_DO_IDLE_SLEEP: @@ -96,13 +111,8 @@ static int exynos_cpu_suspend(unsigned long arg)
static int exynos_suspend(void) { - if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) { - /* Save Power control and Diagnostic registers */ - asm ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c15, c0, 0\n" - "mrc p15, 0, %1, c15, c0, 1\n" - : "=r" (cp15_save_power), "=r" (cp15_save_diag) - : : "cc"); - } + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) + exynos_save_cp15();
writel(EXYNOS_SLEEP_MAGIC, sysram_ns_base_addr + EXYNOS_BOOT_FLAG); writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume_ns), diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c index 78e50ed..e0b6885 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c @@ -209,11 +209,19 @@ static void exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector(long flags)
static int exynos_aftr_finisher(unsigned long flags) { + int ret; + exynos_set_wakeupmask(0x0000ff3e); - exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector(S5P_CHECK_AFTR); /* Set value of power down register for aftr mode */ exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(SYS_AFTR); - cpu_do_idle(); + + ret = call_firmware_op(do_idle, FW_DO_IDLE_AFTR); + if (ret == -ENOSYS) { + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) + exynos_cpu_save_register(); + exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector(S5P_CHECK_AFTR); + cpu_do_idle(); + }
return 1; } @@ -223,14 +231,13 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void) cpu_pm_enter();
exynos_pm_central_suspend(); - if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) - exynos_cpu_save_register();
cpu_suspend(0, exynos_aftr_finisher);
if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) { scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU); - exynos_cpu_restore_register(); + if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS) + exynos_cpu_restore_register(); }
exynos_pm_central_resume();
Add S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION register setup to cpuidle AFTR mode code by moving the relevant code from exynos_pm_suspend() (used only by suspend) to exynos_pm_central_suspend() (used by both suspend and AFTR). Without this setup AFTR mode doesn't show any benefit over WFI one (at least on Exynos4412 SoC). When this setup is applied AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% (as measured on Trats2 board).
This change is a preparation for adding secure firmware support to EXYNOS cpuidle driver.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.park@samsung.com --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c index e0b6885..3cee123 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c @@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ static void exynos_pm_central_suspend(void) tmp = pmu_raw_readl(S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_CONFIGURATION); tmp &= ~S5P_CENTRAL_LOWPWR_CFG; pmu_raw_writel(tmp, S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_CONFIGURATION); + + /* Setting SEQ_OPTION register */ + pmu_raw_writel(S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFI0 | S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFE0, + S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION); }
static int exynos_pm_central_resume(void) @@ -291,15 +295,8 @@ static void exynos_pm_prepare(void)
static int exynos_pm_suspend(void) { - unsigned long tmp; - exynos_pm_central_suspend();
- /* Setting SEQ_OPTION register */ - - tmp = (S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFI0 | S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFE0); - pmu_raw_writel(tmp, S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION); - if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) exynos_cpu_save_register();
Register cpuidle platform device on Exynos4x12 SoCs allowing EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on these SoCs.
AFTR mode reduces power consumption on Trats2 board (Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.park@samsung.com --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c index 6a24e11..15cf86d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c @@ -317,7 +317,9 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void) exynos_sysram_init();
if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210") || - of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4212") || + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412") || + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
On 08/05/2014 03:34 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
Hi Bartlomiej,
I tested your patchset on an odroid-u2. When the cpuidle driver is enabled and the cpu1-3 are offlined, the kernel hangs.
If I disable the AFTR state on cpuidle, and offline the 1-3, it works as expected. So there is something wrong with the AFTR on the odroid board.
Depends on:
- next-20140804 branch of linux-next kernel tree
- [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html)
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
Changes since v4:
- rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
- call exynos_save_cp15() only on A9 type core (this is needed for the future Exynos3250 SoC support)
Changes since v3:
- rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v4][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35192.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
- (re-)added patch fixing S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION register setup
Changes since v2:
- rebased on top of next-20140708 + [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequencies (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32809.html) [with rejects fixed] [PATCH 6/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Register cpuidle device only on Exynos4210 and 5250 (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32808.html) [PATCH 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32991.html) [with rejects fixed in patch #2]
- addressed review comments from Tomasz Figa and Daniel Lezcano
Changes since v1:
- synced against next-20140602
- added missing Acked-by-s
Best regards,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (5): ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines ARM: EXYNOS: add AFTR mode support to firmware do_idle method ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: add secure firmware support to AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: PM: fix register setup for AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: allow driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs
arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 ++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
On Tuesday, August 05, 2014 03:50:54 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:34 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
Hi Bartlomiej,
Hi Daniel,
I tested your patchset on an odroid-u2. When the cpuidle driver is enabled and the cpu1-3 are offlined, the kernel hangs.
If I disable the AFTR state on cpuidle, and offline the 1-3, it works as expected. So there is something wrong with the AFTR on the odroid board.
Thanks for testing. I reproduced the problem on ODROID-U3 board. I also tested Exynos4412 based Origen board and it also has problem with AFTR mode. We did some debugging but nothing specific has came up yet (we suspect that the issue may be caused by incompatibilities of bootloader firmware of ODROID-U2/U3 and Origen4412 boards). We will keep investigating this but in the meantime I would like to have this patchset acked/merged if possible (with Exynos4412 support limited to Trats2 target currently [*]) as:
- it contains mostly fundamental changes for all secure firmware enabled boards (which would be needed also on ODROID/Origen4412 boards if we get AFTR mode working on them)
- it adds working AFTR mode support for Exynos4412 Trats2 target
- it prepares support for Exynos4212 and Exynos3250 targets which are working fine with AFTR mode in our internal kernels and which are not yet upstreamed
[*] In the future it should be possible to enable AFTR mode support per board using DT (basing on patches from Lorenzo), for now it should be fine to check for Trats2 target directly while registering cpuidle platform device. I will post v6 soon.
Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Depends on:
- next-20140804 branch of linux-next kernel tree
- [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html)
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
Changes since v4:
- rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
- call exynos_save_cp15() only on A9 type core (this is needed for the future Exynos3250 SoC support)
Changes since v3:
- rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v4][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35192.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
- (re-)added patch fixing S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION register setup
Changes since v2:
- rebased on top of next-20140708 + [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequencies (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32809.html) [with rejects fixed] [PATCH 6/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Register cpuidle device only on Exynos4210 and 5250 (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32808.html) [PATCH 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32991.html) [with rejects fixed in patch #2]
- addressed review comments from Tomasz Figa and Daniel Lezcano
Changes since v1:
- synced against next-20140602
- added missing Acked-by-s
Best regards,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (5): ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines ARM: EXYNOS: add AFTR mode support to firmware do_idle method ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: add secure firmware support to AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: PM: fix register setup for AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: allow driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs
arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 ++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
On 08/05/2014 03:34 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
As a sidenote:
On my odroid-U2: * 4 cpus online -> 130 mA * 3 cpus online -> 164 mA * 2 cpus online -> 160 mA * 1 cpu online -> 157 mA
So were are consuming more when there are unplugged cpu ... any ideas ?
Thanks !
-- Daniel
Depends on:
- next-20140804 branch of linux-next kernel tree
- [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html)
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
Changes since v4:
- rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v5][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35262.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
- call exynos_save_cp15() only on A9 type core (this is needed for the future Exynos3250 SoC support)
Changes since v3:
- rebased on top of next-20140804 + [PATCH v4][next-20140804] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequences (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg35192.html) [PATCH v2 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34282.html)
- (re-)added patch fixing S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION register setup
Changes since v2:
- rebased on top of next-20140708 + [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequencies (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32809.html) [with rejects fixed] [PATCH 6/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Register cpuidle device only on Exynos4210 and 5250 (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32808.html) [PATCH 0/2] Firmware-assisted suspend/resume of Exynos SoCs (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg32991.html) [with rejects fixed in patch #2]
- addressed review comments from Tomasz Figa and Daniel Lezcano
Changes since v1:
- synced against next-20140602
- added missing Acked-by-s
Best regards,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (5): ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines ARM: EXYNOS: add AFTR mode support to firmware do_idle method ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: add secure firmware support to AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: PM: fix register setup for AFTR mode code ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: allow driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs
arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 ++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
On 05.08.2014 16:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:34 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
As a sidenote:
On my odroid-U2:
- 4 cpus online -> 130 mA
- 3 cpus online -> 164 mA
- 2 cpus online -> 160 mA
- 1 cpu online -> 157 mA
So were are consuming more when there are unplugged cpu ... any ideas ?
On which tree are you testing? Current next has ARMCLK down feature enabled. ARMCLK down may stop working after hotunplugging CPU: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg352890.html
That was observed especially on Exynos4212 where ARMCLK down stops working permanently. On Trats2 (Exynos4412) the clock down stopped only a for short period after disabling CPU.
Best regards, Krzysztof
On 08/05/2014 04:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 05.08.2014 16:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:34 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
As a sidenote:
On my odroid-U2:
- 4 cpus online -> 130 mA
- 3 cpus online -> 164 mA
- 2 cpus online -> 160 mA
- 1 cpu online -> 157 mA
So were are consuming more when there are unplugged cpu ... any ideas ?
On which tree are you testing? Current next has ARMCLK down feature enabled. ARMCLK down may stop working after hotunplugging CPU: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg352890.html
That was observed especially on Exynos4212 where ARMCLK down stops working permanently. On Trats2 (Exynos4412) the clock down stopped only a for short period after disabling CPU.
Hi Krzysztof,
I tested the patches you mentioned above on top of this patchset.
You are right this is directly related to the ARMCLK but the behavior may be not as you expect I think.
When I boot:
4 cpus online => 131 mA
Then I unplug one by one the cpus:
3 cpus online => 127 mA 2 cpus online => 123 mA 1 cpu online => 120 mA
This is consistent.
But now, I online the cpus:
2 cpus online => 162 mA 3 cpus online => 165 mA 4 cpus online => 131 mA
-- side note --
Please note, I did not disable the cpuidle neither the AFTR state and the kernel did not hang but I don't see the noticeable power saving we should be observing when there is one cpu remaining entering the AFTR state (cpuidle stats show we enter AFTR). So there is definitively something wrong with this state.
On wto, 2014-08-05 at 17:07 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/05/2014 04:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 05.08.2014 16:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:34 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
This patch series adds support for AFTR idle mode on boards with secure firmware enabled and allows EXYNOS cpuidle driver usage on Exynos4x12 SoCs.
It has been tested on Trats2 board (using Exynos4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled) on which AFTR mode reduces power consumption by ~12% when EXYNOS cpuidle driver is enabled (in both cases the default exynos_defconfig config is used and CPU1-3 are offlined).
As a sidenote:
On my odroid-U2:
- 4 cpus online -> 130 mA
- 3 cpus online -> 164 mA
- 2 cpus online -> 160 mA
- 1 cpu online -> 157 mA
So were are consuming more when there are unplugged cpu ... any ideas ?
On which tree are you testing? Current next has ARMCLK down feature enabled. ARMCLK down may stop working after hotunplugging CPU: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg352890.html
That was observed especially on Exynos4212 where ARMCLK down stops working permanently. On Trats2 (Exynos4412) the clock down stopped only a for short period after disabling CPU.
Hi Krzysztof,
I tested the patches you mentioned above on top of this patchset.
You are right this is directly related to the ARMCLK but the behavior may be not as you expect I think.
When I boot:
4 cpus online => 131 mA
Then I unplug one by one the cpus:
3 cpus online => 127 mA 2 cpus online => 123 mA 1 cpu online => 120 mA
This is consistent.
But now, I online the cpus:
2 cpus online => 162 mA 3 cpus online => 165 mA 4 cpus online => 131 mA
-- side note --
Please note, I did not disable the cpuidle neither the AFTR state and the kernel did not hang but I don't see the noticeable power saving we should be observing when there is one cpu remaining entering the AFTR state (cpuidle stats show we enter AFTR). So there is definitively something wrong with this state.
Strange things happen... on current next-20140904 I couldn't reproduce this inconsistent energy consumption after hotplug. At least on Trats2 (Exynos4412) and Gear1 (Exynos4212) it behaves consistently (and properly with my patches).
Anyway I'll respin the patchset.
Best regards, Krzysztof
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org