(I'm aware that there is a thread on linaro-dev discussing this exact topic; this is a request for specific information, so I decided to start a new thread)
Hello, As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is very difficult to find the exact git tree that corresponds to a kernel release. Currently the problem I am having is that the 11.11 linaro kernel release (linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5~oneiric1) works well on my new board, but later kernels do not. While I can download the kernel tarball for 3.1.0-1402.5 from launchpad, I would much prefer to use the git tree that it was produced from. Can anybody tell me exactly which git tree was used to create that kernel, and which tag/branch I should be looking at?
Thanks,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
(I'm aware that there is a thread on linaro-dev discussing this exact topic; this is a request for specific information, so I decided to start a new thread)
Hello, As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is very difficult to find the exact git tree that corresponds to a kernel release. Currently the problem I am having is that the 11.11 linaro kernel release (linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5~oneiric1) works well on my new board, but later kernels do not. While I can download the kernel tarball for 3.1.0-1402.5 from launchpad, I would much prefer to use the git tree that it was produced from. Can anybody tell me exactly which git tree was used to create that kernel, and which tag/branch I should be looking at?
That's a really good question. The answer is that it's this tag and branch:
linux-release-2011-12 http://git.linaro.org/git/landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git
However, I think there should be a natural way for you to find that out as well. How could we package this metadata so you'd find it easily?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:59:33PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
(I'm aware that there is a thread on linaro-dev discussing this exact topic; this is a request for specific information, so I decided to start a new thread)
Hello, As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is very difficult to find the exact git tree that corresponds to a kernel release. Currently the problem I am having is that the 11.11 linaro kernel release (linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5~oneiric1) works well on my new board, but later kernels do not. While I can download the kernel tarball for 3.1.0-1402.5 from launchpad, I would much prefer to use the git tree that it was produced from. Can anybody tell me exactly which git tree was used to create that kernel, and which tag/branch I should be looking at?
That's a really good question. The answer is that it's this tag and branch:
linux-release-2011-12 http://git.linaro.org/git/landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git
Sorry, for 11.11 that's tag linux-release-2011-11-1 -- you can see all the tags here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git%3Ba=summary
This is a recap of the discussion we did about source meta data for packages. While interesting it was fruitless, nothing has happened. I'd like to propose to put lava-friendly meta data in: /usr/share/lava/{srcpackagename}/source.json
The file should look like this (for bzr-based projects)
{ "branch_revision": 93556, "branch_url": "lp:gcc-linaro/4.4", "branch_vcs": "bzr", "commit_timestamp": "2010-09-07T14:49:43Z", "project_name": "linaro-gcc" }
And like this for git-based projects
{ "branch_revision": "69f19fbedf6b88eb314b22f1263e2624d4477ac8", "branch_url": "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git", "branch_vcs": "git", "commit_timestamp": "2011-11-23T14:15:50Z", "project_name": "linux" }
If needed we can add support for svn (although I'd prefer to work with a bzr-svn import on launchpad in that case). The field commit_timestamp can be removed. It is optional and can be resolved automatically assuming the repository is still alive. Still it is highly recommended to include this information directly. The field project_name should refer to a launchpad project (when using bzr branches) or to a consistently-named upstream project (otherwise).
I'm not saying this will help to solve OPs problem but at least it will feed LAVA with loads of meta-information about source that runs on the tested boards. If someone likes this format it could be adopted by other tools.
Best regards Zygmunt Krynicki
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Christian Robottom Reis kiko@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:59:33PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
(I'm aware that there is a thread on linaro-dev discussing this exact topic; this is a request for specific information, so I decided to start a new thread)
Hello, As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is very difficult to find the exact git tree that corresponds to a kernel release. Currently the problem I am having is that the 11.11 linaro kernel release (linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5~oneiric1) works well on my new board, but later kernels do not. While I can download the kernel tarball for 3.1.0-1402.5 from launchpad, I would much prefer to use the git tree that it was produced from. Can anybody tell me exactly which git tree was used to create that kernel, and which tag/branch I should be looking at?
That's a really good question. The answer is that it's this tag and branch:
linux-release-2011-12 http://git.linaro.org/git/landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git
Sorry, for 11.11 that's tag linux-release-2011-11-1 -- you can see all the tags here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git%3Ba=summary
Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 01/24/2012 10:01 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:59:33PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
(I'm aware that there is a thread on linaro-dev discussing this exact topic; this is a request for specific information, so I decided to start a new thread)
Hello, As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is very difficult to find the exact git tree that corresponds to a kernel release. Currently the problem I am having is that the 11.11 linaro kernel release (linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5~oneiric1) works well on my new board, but later kernels do not. While I can download the kernel tarball for 3.1.0-1402.5 from launchpad, I would much prefer to use the git tree that it was produced from. Can anybody tell me exactly which git tree was used to create that kernel, and which tag/branch I should be looking at?
That's a really good question. The answer is that it's this tag and branch:
linux-release-2011-12 http://git.linaro.org/git/landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.gitSorry, for 11.11 that's tag linux-release-2011-11-1 -- you can see all the tags here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git;a=summary
Thanks, that is enormously helpful. Though doing a "diff -Nurp" between leb/ti/kernel.git (tag linux-release-2011-11-1) and the tarball that I pulled from launchpad (https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay/+files/linux-lina...), these two trees aren't exactly the same. They are *mostly* the same, and most of the changes look like they'll be benign to me, but it is a bit disconcerting.
In terms of finding things in the future, I have to say that there is a bit of a forest of git trees in linaro. At the very least, I would make sure that the .dsc file in the released deb points to the correct tree+tag that it was generated from. Beyond that, I would recommend:
1) Attempt to reduce the number of trees on git.linaro.org. I understand that there is probably a lot going on, but the sheer number of trees makes it confusing. It might be a good idea to remove some of the very stale or no longer active trees.
2) Document on the wiki where the releases are built from, so there is a running record per release
Thanks again,
On 01/24/2012 09:50 AM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
Thanks, that is enormously helpful. Though doing a "diff -Nurp" between leb/ti/kernel.git (tag linux-release-2011-11-1) and the tarball that I pulled from launchpad (https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay/+files/linux-lina...), these two trees aren't exactly the same. They are *mostly* the same, and most of the changes look like they'll be benign to me, but it is a bit disconcerting.
I think the difference you see here is because linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5%7Eoneiric1.tar.gz includes debian packaging and "ubuntu sauce" patches. I believe those come from:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=ubuntu/linux-linaro-oneiric.git;a=summary
However, I don't know how you find the proper commit in that repo that correlates to the tarball.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:19:22PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
This is a recap of the discussion we did about source meta data for packages. While interesting it was fruitless, nothing has happened. I'd like to propose to put lava-friendly meta data in: /usr/share/lava/{srcpackagename}/source.json
On an installed system image? What happens if, like Chris, somebody's just downloading the kernel release?
I'm not saying this will help to solve OPs problem but at least it
Ah. :-)
will feed LAVA with loads of meta-information about source that runs on the tested boards. If someone likes this format it could be adopted by other tools.
I think the general idea is good but probably doesn't apply as neatly to Android as it does for Ubuntu and other package-based Linux; is that right?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
In terms of finding things in the future, I have to say that there is a bit of a forest of git trees in linaro. At the very least, I would make sure that the .dsc file in the released deb points to the correct tree+tag that it was generated from.
That's not a bad idea. John, can we make that happen?
- Attempt to reduce the number of trees on git.linaro.org. I
understand that there is probably a lot going on, but the sheer number of trees makes it confusing. It might be a good idea to remove some of the very stale or no longer active trees.
What do Deepak and Loïc think of this in general?
- Document on the wiki where the releases are built from, so there
is a running record per release
Where would we record this, Deepak, Alexander, Loïc?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 01/24/2012 10:01 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:59:33PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
(I'm aware that there is a thread on linaro-dev discussing this exact topic; this is a request for specific information, so I decided to start a new thread)
Hello, As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is very difficult to find the exact git tree that corresponds to a kernel release. Currently the problem I am having is that the 11.11 linaro kernel release (linux-linaro-lt-omap_3.1.0-1402.5~oneiric1) works well on my new board, but later kernels do not. While I can download the kernel tarball for 3.1.0-1402.5 from launchpad, I would much prefer to use the git tree that it was produced from. Can anybody tell me exactly which git tree was used to create that kernel, and which tag/branch I should be looking at?
That's a really good question. The answer is that it's this tag and branch:
linux-release-2011-12 http://git.linaro.org/git/landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.gitSorry, for 11.11 that's tag linux-release-2011-11-1 -- you can see all the tags here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/leb/ti/kernel.git;a=summaryThanks, that is enormously helpful. Though doing a "diff -Nurp" between leb/ti/kernel.git (tag linux-release-2011-11-1) and the tarball that I pulled from launchpad (https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay/+files/linux-lina...), these two trees aren't exactly the same. They are *mostly* the same, and most of the changes look like they'll be benign to me, but it is a bit disconcerting.
Here was my outline for a possible way to fix this.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2012-January/009694.html
Do you have any comments on it? Your views are valuable, since you've experienced the problem we're trying to solve.
Cheers ---Dave
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christian Robottom Reis kiko@linaro.orgwrote:
- Attempt to reduce the number of trees on git.linaro.org. I
understand that there is probably a lot going on, but the sheer number of trees makes it confusing. It might be a good idea to remove some of the very stale or no longer active trees.
What do Deepak and Loïc think of this in general?
fwiw, i like the 'structured' layout used here http://arago-project.org/git/. you can keep the really critical/important trees on the top level, and then create sub-domains for 'people', 'android', ...
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:14:10PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
In terms of finding things in the future, I have to say that there is a bit of a forest of git trees in linaro. At the very least, I would make sure that the .dsc file in the released deb points to the correct tree+tag that it was generated from.
That's not a bad idea. John, can we make that happen?
- Attempt to reduce the number of trees on git.linaro.org. I
understand that there is probably a lot going on, but the sheer number of trees makes it confusing. It might be a good idea to remove some of the very stale or no longer active trees.
What do Deepak and Lo?c think of this in general?
- Document on the wiki where the releases are built from, so there
is a running record per release
Where would we record this, Deepak, Alexander, Lo?c?
For Ubuntu, I think the (only) correct way to track this is to represent linaro releases as actual releases in the package archive.
i.e., sources.list will look like
deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports precise main deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/linaro-maintainers/overlay linaro-12.02 main
And http://ppa.launchpad.net/linaro-maintainers/overlay/ubuntu/dists/linaro-12.0... and the things it points to would then be authoritative definition of what was in that release for evermore (or at least, the GPL-requisite 3 years).
Once we have this, we can document robustly how to find out, because the means to do so will be stable and not constantly changing.
Do you know if this is sensible/doable, or is launchpad very tied the ubuntu release names?
Cheers ---Dave
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christian Robottom Reis kiko@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
- Attempt to reduce the number of trees on git.linaro.org. I
understand that there is probably a lot going on, but the sheer number of trees makes it confusing. It might be a good idea to remove some of the very stale or no longer active trees.
What do Deepak and Loďc think of this in general?
I would propose to: * hide people/ trees and show them on people.git.linaro.org instead of main git.linaro.org. At best git:// urls would be valid still aftterwards * hide the android/ trees and don't show them anywhere else; keep git:// urls and/or http:// clone urls wprking too
This would definitely air to breath and we can continue to improve things from there.
- Document on the wiki where the releases are built from, so there
is a running record per release
Where would we record this, Deepak, Alexander, Loďc?
I am thinking ...
If it's about documenting released bits it's something that should come out of our release process. The release team can bring that together. For that the information needs to be shipped along- or inside the source artifact. As one example, ubuntu packages having a vcs-bzr field and a reasonable tagging/versioning scheme could probably work, but we have to look case by case.
Where are we putting it? One place that comes to my mind is obviously the release wiki page: https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1201/Release/?
2012/1/27 Alexander Sack asac@linaro.org:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christian Robottom Reis kiko@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
- Attempt to reduce the number of trees on git.linaro.org. I
understand that there is probably a lot going on, but the sheer number of trees makes it confusing. It might be a good idea to remove some of the very stale or no longer active trees.
What do Deepak and Loďc think of this in general?
I would propose to: * hide people/ trees and show them on people.git.linaro.org instead of main git.linaro.org. At best git:// urls would be valid still aftterwards * hide the android/ trees and don't show them anywhere else; keep git:// urls and/or http:// clone urls wprking too
This would definitely air to breath and we can continue to improve things from there.
- Document on the wiki where the releases are built from, so there
is a running record per release
Where would we record this, Deepak, Alexander, Loďc?
I am thinking ...
If it's about documenting released bits it's something that should come out of our release process. The release team can bring that together. For that the information needs to be shipped along- or inside the source artifact. As one example, ubuntu packages having a vcs-bzr field and a reasonable tagging/versioning scheme could probably work, but we have to look case by case.
Where are we putting it? One place that comes to my mind is obviously the release wiki page: https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1201/Release/?
Another one is https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/ProjectsSummary I'd like to generate this table automatically to keep it up-to-date, based on inputs from packages meta data (using additional user-defined fields to debian/control file).
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
-
Alexander Sack -
Andy Doan -
Chris Lalancette -
Christian Robottom Reis -
Dave Martin -
Dechesne, Nicolas -
Fathi Boudra -
Zygmunt Krynicki