Hi Pi-Cheng,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org wrote:
Since the return value of ->init() of cpufreq driver is not propagated to the device driver model now, move resources allocation into ->probe() to handle -EPROBE_DEFER properly.
Signed-off-by: Pi-Cheng Chen pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org
drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c index 9d0fe37..1142625 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c @@ -41,16 +41,35 @@
- the original PLL becomes stable at target frequency.
*/ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
struct cpumask cpus; struct device *cpu_dev; struct regulator *proc_reg; struct regulator *sram_reg; struct clk *cpu_clk; struct clk *inter_clk; struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
struct list_head list_head; int intermediate_voltage; bool need_voltage_tracking;
};
+static LIST_HEAD(dvfs_info_list);
+struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *get_dvfs_info(int cpu) +{
struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
struct list_head *list;
list_for_each(list, &dvfs_info_list) {
info = list_entry(list, struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info, list_head);
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &info->cpus))
return info;
}
return NULL;
+}
static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int new_vproc) { @@ -402,6 +421,9 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu) */ info->need_voltage_tracking = !IS_ERR(sram_reg);
/* CPUs in the same cluster share a clock and power domain. */
cpumask_copy(&info->cpus, &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling);
return 0;
out_free_opp_table: @@ -440,47 +462,32 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; int ret;
info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(info, policy->cpu);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s failed to initialize dvfs info for cpu%d\n",
__func__, policy->cpu);
goto out_free_dvfs_info;
info = get_dvfs_info(policy->cpu);
if (!info) {
pr_err("dvfs info for cpu%d is not initialized.\n",
policy->cpu);
return -EINVAL; } ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev, &freq_table); if (ret) { pr_err("failed to init cpufreq table for cpu%d: %d\n", policy->cpu, ret);
goto out_release_dvfs_info;
return ret; } ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, freq_table); if (ret) { pr_err("%s: invalid frequency table: %d\n", __func__, ret);
goto out_free_cpufreq_table;
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev, &freq_table);
return ret; }
/* CPUs in the same cluster share a clock and power domain. */
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &cpu_topology[policy->cpu].core_sibling);
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &info->cpus); policy->driver_data = info; policy->clk = info->cpu_clk; return 0;
-out_free_cpufreq_table:
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev, &freq_table);
-out_release_dvfs_info:
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(info);
-out_free_dvfs_info:
kfree(info);
return ret;
}
static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) @@ -489,8 +496,6 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev); dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(info);
kfree(info); return 0;
} @@ -510,12 +515,47 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver mt8173_cpufreq_driver = {
static int mt8173_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
int ret;
struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
struct list_head *list, *tmp;
int cpu, ret;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
info = get_dvfs_info(cpu);
if (info)
continue;
info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto release_dvfs_info_list;
}
ret = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(info, cpu);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s failed to initialize dvfs info for cpu%d\n",
__func__, cpu);
kfree(info);
goto release_dvfs_info_list;
}
list_add(&info->list_head, &dvfs_info_list);
} ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&mt8173_cpufreq_driver); if (ret) pr_err("failed to register mtk cpufreq driver\n");
I think you want "return ret;" inside the if block.
return 0;
+release_dvfs_info_list:
list_for_each_safe(list, tmp, &dvfs_info_list) {
info = list_entry(list, struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info, list_head);
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(info);
list_del(list);
kfree(info);
}
return ret;
}
-- 1.9.1
Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
On 30-11-15, 11:02, Ricky Liang wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org wrote:
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&mt8173_cpufreq_driver); if (ret) pr_err("failed to register mtk cpufreq driver\n");
I think you want "return ret;" inside the if block.
Not just that, he needs to jump to release_dvfs_info_list.
return 0;
+release_dvfs_info_list:
list_for_each_safe(list, tmp, &dvfs_info_list) {
info = list_entry(list, struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info, list_head);
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(info);
list_del(list);
kfree(info);
}
return ret;
}
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 30-11-15, 11:02, Ricky Liang wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org wrote:
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&mt8173_cpufreq_driver); if (ret) pr_err("failed to register mtk cpufreq driver\n");
I think you want "return ret;" inside the if block.
Not just that, he needs to jump to release_dvfs_info_list.
Hi Ricky and Viresh,
Thanks for reviewing. I failed to check this error case handling. I will fix it and resend again.
Best Regards, Pi-Cheng
return 0;
+release_dvfs_info_list:
list_for_each_safe(list, tmp, &dvfs_info_list) {
info = list_entry(list, struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info, list_head);
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(info);
list_del(list);
kfree(info);
}
return ret;
}
-- viresh
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org