From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
The accessory detect debounce work is not performance sensitive so let the scheduler run it wherever is most efficient rather than in a per CPU workqueue by using the system power efficient workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org --- sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c index 44621dd..caf8784 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c @@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ static irqreturn_t twl6040_audio_handler(int irq, void *data) struct snd_soc_codec *codec = data; struct twl6040_data *priv = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- schedule_delayed_work(&priv->hs_jack.work, msecs_to_jiffies(200)); + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, + &priv->hs_jack.work, msecs_to_jiffies(200));
return IRQ_HANDLED; }
On 19 July 2013 03:15, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
The accessory detect debounce work is not performance sensitive so let the scheduler run it wherever is most efficient rather than in a per CPU workqueue by using the system power efficient workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
On 07/18/2013 11:45 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
The accessory detect debounce work is not performance sensitive so let the scheduler run it wherever is most efficient rather than in a per CPU workqueue by using the system power efficient workqueue.
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org