CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18 Reported-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +- arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig @@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18 Reported-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
OK, so who should be applying this?
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +- arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig @@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
On 15 December 2014 at 20:30, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18 Reported-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
OK, so who should be applying this?
I think you can take it.. @Arnd: Any objections ?
"Rafael J. Wysocki" rjw@rjwysocki.net writes:
On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18 Reported-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
OK, so who should be applying this?
Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the v3.19-rc cycle.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman khilman@kernel.org wrote:
"Rafael J. Wysocki" rjw@rjwysocki.net writes:
On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18 Reported-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
OK, so who should be applying this?
Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the v3.19-rc cycle.
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we wait to go through Tony? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com wrote:
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we wait to go through Tony? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.
Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org writes:
On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com wrote:
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we wait to go through Tony? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.
Right, this was initially planned for v3.19-rc, but since we were sending another round of pull requests, arm-soc/fixes was included.
Kevin
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
-
Kevin Hilman -
Nishanth Menon -
Rafael J. Wysocki -
Viresh Kumar