From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org

Since NULL could in theory be a valid regulator we ought to check for IS_ERR() rather than for NULL. In practice this is unlikely to be an issue but it's better for neatness.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c index ad1fde2..09cd3a7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,

cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

- if (cpu_reg) { + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) { rcu_read_lock(); opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &freq_Hz); if (IS_ERR(opp)) { @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);

/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */ - if (cpu_reg && freqs.new > freqs.old) { + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new > freqs.old) { ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol); if (ret) { pr_err("failed to scale voltage up: %d\n", ret); @@ -102,14 +102,14 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, ret = clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freq_exact); if (ret) { pr_err("failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret); - if (cpu_reg) + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt_old, tol); freqs.new = freqs.old; goto post_notify; }

/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */ - if (cpu_reg && freqs.new < freqs.old) { + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new < freqs.old) { ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol); if (ret) { pr_err("failed to scale voltage down: %d\n", ret); @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } pr_warn("failed to get cpu0 regulator: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(cpu_reg)); - cpu_reg = NULL; }

cpu_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, NULL);