On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.94 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net>
Guenter
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:06:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.172 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 418 pass: 418 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net>
Guenter
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:06:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.218 release.
> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 168 pass: 168 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 404 pass: 404 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net>
Guenter
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:06:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.254 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 165 pass: 165 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 328 pass: 328 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net>
Guenter
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc…
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org>
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.12-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06
git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10…
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11)
Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kselftest
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* fwts
* kunit
* rcutorture
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net>
Guenter
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2021-01-29 12:07:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> CIP testing did not find any problems here:
>
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-…
>
> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel(a)denx.de>
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h