January 2021 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 34d1eb0e599875064955a74712f08ff14c8e3d5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups If we fail to update a block group item in the loop we'll break, however we'll do btrfs_run_delayed_refs and lose our error value in ret, and thus not clean up properly. Fix this by only running the delayed refs if there was no failure. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 52f2198d44c9..0886e81e5540 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -2669,7 +2669,8 @@ int btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) * Go through delayed refs for all the stuff we've just kicked off * and then loop back (just once) */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); if (!ret && loops == 0) { loops++; spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 34d1eb0e599875064955a74712f08ff14c8e3d5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups If we fail to update a block group item in the loop we'll break, however we'll do btrfs_run_delayed_refs and lose our error value in ret, and thus not clean up properly. Fix this by only running the delayed refs if there was no failure. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 52f2198d44c9..0886e81e5540 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -2669,7 +2669,8 @@ int btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) * Go through delayed refs for all the stuff we've just kicked off * and then loop back (just once) */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); if (!ret && loops == 0) { loops++; spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 34d1eb0e599875064955a74712f08ff14c8e3d5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups If we fail to update a block group item in the loop we'll break, however we'll do btrfs_run_delayed_refs and lose our error value in ret, and thus not clean up properly. Fix this by only running the delayed refs if there was no failure. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 52f2198d44c9..0886e81e5540 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -2669,7 +2669,8 @@ int btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) * Go through delayed refs for all the stuff we've just kicked off * and then loop back (just once) */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); if (!ret && loops == 0) { loops++; spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 34d1eb0e599875064955a74712f08ff14c8e3d5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups If we fail to update a block group item in the loop we'll break, however we'll do btrfs_run_delayed_refs and lose our error value in ret, and thus not clean up properly. Fix this by only running the delayed refs if there was no failure. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 52f2198d44c9..0886e81e5540 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -2669,7 +2669,8 @@ int btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) * Go through delayed refs for all the stuff we've just kicked off * and then loop back (just once) */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); if (!ret && loops == 0) { loops++; spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fb286100974e7239af243bc2255a52f29442f9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation While testing the error paths of relocation I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ mount/779 is trying to acquire lock: ffffa0e676945418 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 but task is already holding lock: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x462/0x8f0 btrfs_update_root+0x55/0x2b0 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x398/0x750 clean_dirty_subvols+0xdf/0x120 btrfs_recover_relocation+0x534/0x5a0 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xcb/0x170 open_ctree+0x151f/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: start_transaction+0x444/0x700 insert_balance_item.isra.0+0x37/0x320 btrfs_balance+0x354/0xf40 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2cf/0x380 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &fs_info->balance_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by mount/779: #0: ffffa0e60dc040e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380 #1: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 779 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2c4/0x2f0 ? btrfs_get_64+0x5e/0x100 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x2f2/0x320 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 ? capable+0x3a/0x60 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is straightforward to fix, simply release the path before we setup the balance_ctl. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 2c0aa03b6437..0c7f4f6237e8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4318,6 +4318,8 @@ int btrfs_recover_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_warn(fs_info, "balance: cannot set exclusive op status, resume manually"); + btrfs_release_path(path); + mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl); spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fb286100974e7239af243bc2255a52f29442f9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation While testing the error paths of relocation I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ mount/779 is trying to acquire lock: ffffa0e676945418 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 but task is already holding lock: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x462/0x8f0 btrfs_update_root+0x55/0x2b0 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x398/0x750 clean_dirty_subvols+0xdf/0x120 btrfs_recover_relocation+0x534/0x5a0 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xcb/0x170 open_ctree+0x151f/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: start_transaction+0x444/0x700 insert_balance_item.isra.0+0x37/0x320 btrfs_balance+0x354/0xf40 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2cf/0x380 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &fs_info->balance_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by mount/779: #0: ffffa0e60dc040e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380 #1: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 779 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2c4/0x2f0 ? btrfs_get_64+0x5e/0x100 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x2f2/0x320 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 ? capable+0x3a/0x60 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is straightforward to fix, simply release the path before we setup the balance_ctl. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 2c0aa03b6437..0c7f4f6237e8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4318,6 +4318,8 @@ int btrfs_recover_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_warn(fs_info, "balance: cannot set exclusive op status, resume manually"); + btrfs_release_path(path); + mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl); spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From fb286100974e7239af243bc2255a52f29442f9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation While testing the error paths of relocation I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ mount/779 is trying to acquire lock: ffffa0e676945418 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 but task is already holding lock: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x462/0x8f0 btrfs_update_root+0x55/0x2b0 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x398/0x750 clean_dirty_subvols+0xdf/0x120 btrfs_recover_relocation+0x534/0x5a0 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xcb/0x170 open_ctree+0x151f/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: start_transaction+0x444/0x700 insert_balance_item.isra.0+0x37/0x320 btrfs_balance+0x354/0xf40 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2cf/0x380 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &fs_info->balance_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by mount/779: #0: ffffa0e60dc040e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380 #1: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 779 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2c4/0x2f0 ? btrfs_get_64+0x5e/0x100 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x2f2/0x320 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 ? capable+0x3a/0x60 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is straightforward to fix, simply release the path before we setup the balance_ctl. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 2c0aa03b6437..0c7f4f6237e8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4318,6 +4318,8 @@ int btrfs_recover_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_warn(fs_info, "balance: cannot set exclusive op status, resume manually"); + btrfs_release_path(path); + mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl); spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 49ecc679ab48b40ca799bf94b327d5284eac9e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error Zygo reported the following KASAN splat: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836 CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210 ? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 __asan_load8+0x69/0x90 btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780 ? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0 ? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0 ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150 ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0 ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags+0x26/0x30 ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60 ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427 Allocated by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0 btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0 btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0 build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30 __kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xde/0x200 btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530 build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This occurred because we freed our backref node in btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in btrfs_backref_release_cache(). This is because btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the cache->leaves nodes and free them up. However btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node without unlinking it from the cache. Change this to a btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped. Fixes: 75bfb9aff45e ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c index 02d7d7b2563b..9cadacf3ec27 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c @@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ void btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(struct btrfs_backref_cache *cache, list_del_init(&lower->list); if (lower == node) node = NULL; - btrfs_backref_free_node(cache, lower); + btrfs_backref_drop_node(cache, lower); } btrfs_backref_cleanup_node(cache, node);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 49ecc679ab48b40ca799bf94b327d5284eac9e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error Zygo reported the following KASAN splat: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836 CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210 ? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 __asan_load8+0x69/0x90 btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780 ? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0 ? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0 ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150 ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0 ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags+0x26/0x30 ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60 ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427 Allocated by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0 btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0 btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0 build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30 __kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xde/0x200 btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530 build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This occurred because we freed our backref node in btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in btrfs_backref_release_cache(). This is because btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the cache->leaves nodes and free them up. However btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node without unlinking it from the cache. Change this to a btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped. Fixes: 75bfb9aff45e ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c index 02d7d7b2563b..9cadacf3ec27 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c @@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ void btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(struct btrfs_backref_cache *cache, list_del_init(&lower->list); if (lower == node) node = NULL; - btrfs_backref_free_node(cache, lower); + btrfs_backref_drop_node(cache, lower); } btrfs_backref_cleanup_node(cache, node);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 49ecc679ab48b40ca799bf94b327d5284eac9e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error Zygo reported the following KASAN splat: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836 CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210 ? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 __asan_load8+0x69/0x90 btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780 ? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0 ? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0 ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150 ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0 ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags+0x26/0x30 ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60 ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427 Allocated by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0 btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0 btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0 build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30 __kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xde/0x200 btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530 build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This occurred because we freed our backref node in btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in btrfs_backref_release_cache(). This is because btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the cache->leaves nodes and free them up. However btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node without unlinking it from the cache. Change this to a btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped. Fixes: 75bfb9aff45e ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c index 02d7d7b2563b..9cadacf3ec27 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c @@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ void btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(struct btrfs_backref_cache *cache, list_del_init(&lower->list); if (lower == node) node = NULL; - btrfs_backref_free_node(cache, lower); + btrfs_backref_drop_node(cache, lower); } btrfs_backref_cleanup_node(cache, node);

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror January 2021