October 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x c3b47f49e83197e8dffd023ec568403bcdbb774b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100756-parasail-agreement-0453@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: c3b47f49e831 ("btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion") d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") 83354f0772cd ("btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots") 61fa90c16b0b ("btrfs: switch BTRFS_ROOT_* to enums") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From c3b47f49e83197e8dffd023ec568403bcdbb774b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:05:58 +0930 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion [BUG] Syzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676 prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642 relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678 ... BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667] RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926 Call Trace: <TASK> commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430 del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline] reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742 btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [CAUSE] The allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside prepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call unset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info->balance_ctl to be NULL. Then we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling reset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete the balance item in the root tree. However during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and unset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a reloc_root for that subvolume. Then we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of del_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside commit_fs_roots(). That function checks if fs_info->reloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree stage, but since fs_info->reloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Just add extra check on fs_info->reloc_ctl inside btrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking fs_info->reloc_ctl->merge_reloc_tree. That DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the reloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all, we do not need to bother that. Reported-by: syzbot+283673dbc38527ef9f3d(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/66f6bfa7.050a0220.38ace9.0019.GAE@googl… CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c index cf1dfeaaf2d8..f3834f8d26b4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ int btrfs_update_reloc_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_grab_root(reloc_root); /* root->reloc_root will stay until current relocation finished */ - if (fs_info->reloc_ctl->merge_reloc_tree && + if (fs_info->reloc_ctl && fs_info->reloc_ctl->merge_reloc_tree && btrfs_root_refs(root_item) == 0) { set_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state); /*

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100730-uneatable-grill-4244@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100729-scanning-delegator-9af9@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100729-grimacing-creamlike-16ee@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100728-corsage-tinsmith-1569@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100727-little-twitter-555a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100726-skeleton-decal-096d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 6.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100726-disabled-stallion-fa4c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a" failed to apply to 6.11-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.11-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.11.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100725-equity-eloquent-38d6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.11.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") 86309cbed261 ("ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin(a)gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index dda59ee5a11e..1c45ff6dbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook)) power_supply_changed(battery->bat); } - list_del(&hook->list); + list_del_init(&hook->list); pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name); } @@ -723,7 +723,14 @@ static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) { mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + /* + * Ignore already unregistered battery hooks. This might happen + * if a battery hook was previously unloaded due to an error when + * adding a new battery. + */ + if (!list_empty(&hook->list)) + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook); + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister); @@ -733,7 +740,6 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook) struct acpi_battery *battery; mutex_lock(&hook_mutex); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook->list); list_add(&hook->list, &battery_hook_list); /* * Now that the driver is registered, we need

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Add GPLL9 support" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 818a2f8d5e4ad2c1e39a4290158fe8e39a744c70 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100727-shock-morality-cfc4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 818a2f8d5e4a ("clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Add GPLL9 support") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 818a2f8d5e4ad2c1e39a4290158fe8e39a744c70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap(a)quicinc.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:43:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Add GPLL9 support Add the missing GPLL9 pll and fix the gcc_parents_7 data to use the correct pll hw. Fixes: 4433594bbe5d ("clk: qcom: gcc: Add global clock controller driver for SC8180x") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap(a)quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812-gcc-sc8180x-fixes-v2-3-8b3eaa5fb856@quic… Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc8180x.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc8180x.c index d25c5dc37f91..0596427f8922 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc8180x.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc8180x.c @@ -142,6 +142,23 @@ static struct clk_alpha_pll gpll7 = { }, }; +static struct clk_alpha_pll gpll9 = { + .offset = 0x1c000, + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_TRION], + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x52000, + .enable_mask = BIT(9), + .hw.init = &(const struct clk_init_data) { + .name = "gpll9", + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) { + .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fixed_trion_ops, + }, + }, +}; + static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_0[] = { { P_BI_TCXO, 0 }, { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 }, @@ -241,7 +258,7 @@ static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_7[] = { static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_7[] = { { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", }, { .hw = &gpll0.clkr.hw }, - { .name = "gppl9" }, + { .hw = &gpll9.clkr.hw }, { .hw = &gpll4.clkr.hw }, { .hw = &gpll0_out_even.clkr.hw }, }; @@ -4552,6 +4569,7 @@ static struct clk_regmap *gcc_sc8180x_clocks[] = { [GPLL1] = &gpll1.clkr, [GPLL4] = &gpll4.clkr, [GPLL7] = &gpll7.clkr, + [GPLL9] = &gpll9.clkr, }; static const struct qcom_reset_map gcc_sc8180x_resets[] = {

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror October 2024