While converting users of msecs_to_jiffies(), lkp reported that some
range checks would always be true because of the mismatch between the
implied int value of secs_to_jiffies() vs the unsigned long
return value of the msecs_to_jiffies() calls it was replacing. Fix this
by casting secs_to_jiffies() values as unsigned long.
Fixes: b35108a51cf7ba ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()")
CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.12+
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501301334.NB6NszQR-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha(a)linux.microsoft.com>
---
include/linux/jiffies.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/jiffies.h b/include/linux/jiffies.h
index ed945f42e064..0ea8c9887429 100644
--- a/include/linux/jiffies.h
+++ b/include/linux/jiffies.h
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long msecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int m)
*
* Return: jiffies value
*/
-#define secs_to_jiffies(_secs) ((_secs) * HZ)
+#define secs_to_jiffies(_secs) (unsigned long)((_secs) * HZ)
extern unsigned long __usecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int u);
#if !(USEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
--
2.43.0
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley(a)microchip.com>
In mchp_core_pwm_apply_locked(), if hw_period_steps is equal to its max,
an error is reported and .apply fails. The max value is actually a
permitted value however, and so this check can fail where multiple
channels are enabled.
For example, the first channel to be configured requests a period that
sets hw_period_steps to the maximum value, and when a second channel
is enabled the driver reads hw_period_steps back from the hardware and
finds it to be the maximum possible value, triggering the warning on a
permitted value. The value to be avoided is 255 (PERIOD_STEPS_MAX + 1),
as that will produce undesired behaviour, so test for greater than,
rather than equal to.
Fixes: 2bf7ecf7b4ff ("pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver")
CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley(a)microchip.com>
---
CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley(a)microchip.com>
CC: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara(a)microchip.com>
CC: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek(a)kernel.org>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding(a)gmail.com>
CC: linux-riscv(a)lists.infradead.org
CC: linux-pwm(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c
index c1f2287b8e97..12821b4bbf97 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int mchp_core_pwm_apply_locked(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *
* mchp_core_pwm_calc_period().
* The period is locked and we cannot change this, so we abort.
*/
- if (hw_period_steps == MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_STEPS_MAX)
+ if (hw_period_steps > MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_STEPS_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
prescale = hw_prescale;
--
2.45.2
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 06:45:55PM +0000, Shubham Pushpkar -X (spushpka - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) wrote:
> Thank you, Greg, for your feedback and for highlighting the importance
> of thorough testing. I apologize for any oversight in my previous
> submission. I will ensure that all future patches are rigorously
> tested before submission.
Again, they must be tested AND have a second signed-off-by from someone
else in your company when you resend them as proof of this testing by
both of you.
thanks,
greg k-h
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com>
commit aec8e6bf839101784f3ef037dcdb9432c3f32343 ("btrfs:
fix use-after-free of block device file in __btrfs_free_extra_devids()")
Mounting btrfs from two images (which have the same one fsid and two
different dev_uuids) in certain executing order may trigger an UAF for
variable 'device->bdev_file' in __btrfs_free_extra_devids(). And
following are the details:
1. Attach image_1 to loop0, attach image_2 to loop1, and scan btrfs
devices by ioctl(BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV):
/ btrfs_device_1 → loop0
fs_device
\ btrfs_device_2 → loop1
2. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt
btrfs_open_devices
btrfs_device_1->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop0)
btrfs_device_2->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop1)
btrfs_fill_super
open_ctree
fail: btrfs_close_devices // -ENOMEM
btrfs_close_bdev(btrfs_device_1)
fput(btrfs_device_1->bdev_file)
// btrfs_device_1->bdev_file is freed
btrfs_close_bdev(btrfs_device_2)
fput(btrfs_device_2->bdev_file)
3. mount /dev/loop1 /mnt
btrfs_open_devices
btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(&bdev_file)
// EIO, btrfs_device_1->bdev_file is not assigned,
// which points to a freed memory area
btrfs_device_2->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop1)
btrfs_fill_super
open_ctree
btrfs_free_extra_devids
if (btrfs_device_1->bdev_file)
fput(btrfs_device_1->bdev_file) // UAF !
Fix it by setting 'device->bdev_file' as 'NULL' after closing the
btrfs_device in btrfs_close_one_device().
Fixes: CVE-2024-50217
Fixes: 142388194191 ("btrfs: do not background blkdev_put()")
CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219408
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit aec8e6bf839101784f3ef037dcdb9432c3f32343)
Signed-off-by: Shubham Pushpkar <spushpka(a)cisco.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b9a0b26d08e1..ab2412542ce5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1176,6 +1176,7 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
if (device->bdev) {
fs_devices->open_devices--;
device->bdev = NULL;
+ device->bdev_file = NULL;
}
clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
btrfs_destroy_dev_zone_info(device);
--
2.35.6
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com>
commit aec8e6bf839101784f3ef037dcdb9432c3f32343 ("btrfs:
fix use-after-free of block device file in __btrfs_free_extra_devids()")
Mounting btrfs from two images (which have the same one fsid and two
different dev_uuids) in certain executing order may trigger an UAF for
variable 'device->bdev_file' in __btrfs_free_extra_devids(). And
following are the details:
1. Attach image_1 to loop0, attach image_2 to loop1, and scan btrfs
devices by ioctl(BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV):
/ btrfs_device_1 → loop0
fs_device
\ btrfs_device_2 → loop1
2. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt
btrfs_open_devices
btrfs_device_1->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop0)
btrfs_device_2->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop1)
btrfs_fill_super
open_ctree
fail: btrfs_close_devices // -ENOMEM
btrfs_close_bdev(btrfs_device_1)
fput(btrfs_device_1->bdev_file)
// btrfs_device_1->bdev_file is freed
btrfs_close_bdev(btrfs_device_2)
fput(btrfs_device_2->bdev_file)
3. mount /dev/loop1 /mnt
btrfs_open_devices
btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(&bdev_file)
// EIO, btrfs_device_1->bdev_file is not assigned,
// which points to a freed memory area
btrfs_device_2->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop1)
btrfs_fill_super
open_ctree
btrfs_free_extra_devids
if (btrfs_device_1->bdev_file)
fput(btrfs_device_1->bdev_file) // UAF !
Fix it by setting 'device->bdev_file' as 'NULL' after closing the
btrfs_device in btrfs_close_one_device().
Fixes: 142388194191 ("btrfs: do not background blkdev_put()")
CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219408
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit aec8e6bf839101784f3ef037dcdb9432c3f32343)
Signed-off-by: Shubham Pushpkar <spushpka(a)cisco.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b9a0b26d08e1..ab2412542ce5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1176,6 +1176,7 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
if (device->bdev) {
fs_devices->open_devices--;
device->bdev = NULL;
+ device->bdev_file = NULL;
}
clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
btrfs_destroy_dev_zone_info(device);
--
2.35.6
From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb(a)tipi-net.de>
Before commit 25f51b76f90f1 ("xhci-pci: Make xhci-pci-renesas a proper
modular driver"), the xhci-pci driver handled the Renesas uPD72020x USB3
PHY and only utilized features of xhci-pci-renesas when no external
firmware EEPROM was attached. This allowed devices with a valid firmware
stored in EEPROM to function without requiring xhci-pci-renesas.
That commit changed the behavior, making xhci-pci-renesas responsible for
handling these devices entirely, even when firmware was already present
in EEPROM. As a result, unnecessary warnings about missing firmware files
appeared, and more critically, USB functionality broke whens
CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI_RENESAS was not enabled—despite previously workings
without it.
Fix this by ensuring that devices are only handed over to xhci-pci-renesas
if the config option is enabled. Otherwise, restore the original behavior
and handle them as standard xhci-pci devices.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb(a)tipi-net.de>
Fixes: 25f51b76f90f ("xhci-pci: Make xhci-pci-renesas a proper modular driver")
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
index 2d1e205c14c60..4ce80d8ac603e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
@@ -654,9 +654,11 @@ int xhci_pci_common_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(xhci_pci_common_probe, "xhci");
static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids_reject[] = {
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI_RENESAS)
/* handled by xhci-pci-renesas */
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS, 0x0014) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS, 0x0015) },
+#endif
{ /* end: all zeroes */ }
};
--
2.39.5
Cases rec->counter == {0, 1} are checked already.
While x * (x - 1) * 1000 = 0 have many solutions greater than 1 for both
modulo 2^32 and 2^64, that is not the case for x * (x - 1) = 0, so split
division into two.
It is not scary in practice because mod 2^64 solutions are huge and
minimal mod 2^32 solution is 30-bit number.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e31f7939c1c27 ("ftrace: Avoid potential division by zero in function profiler")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Kuratov <kniv(a)yandex-team.ru>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 728ecda6e8d4..e1c05c4c29c2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -570,12 +570,12 @@ static int function_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
stddev = rec->counter * rec->time_squared -
rec->time * rec->time;
+ stddev = div64_ul(stddev, rec->counter * (rec->counter - 1));
/*
* Divide only 1000 for ns^2 -> us^2 conversion.
* trace_print_graph_duration will divide 1000 again.
*/
- stddev = div64_ul(stddev,
- rec->counter * (rec->counter - 1) * 1000);
+ stddev = div64_ul(stddev, 1000);
}
trace_seq_init(&s);
--
2.34.1