May 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051202-nutrient-upswing-4a86@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:35:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to an invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this invalid access, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421113536.3682201-1-gavinguo@igalia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418085802.2973519-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan(a)redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest(a)google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2a47682d1ab7..47d76d03ce30 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,9 +3087,12 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and folio lock + * guarantees that it must be of the wrong folio anyway. + */ + if (folio && (pmd_migration || folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))) return; __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); }

1 week, 2 days

5
6
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051204-tidal-lake-6ae7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:35:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to an invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this invalid access, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421113536.3682201-1-gavinguo@igalia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418085802.2973519-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan(a)redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest(a)google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2a47682d1ab7..47d76d03ce30 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,9 +3087,12 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and folio lock + * guarantees that it must be of the wrong folio anyway. + */ + if (folio && (pmd_migration || folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))) return; __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); }

1 week, 3 days

4
8
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051206-t-shirt-wrist-ad33@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:35:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to an invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this invalid access, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421113536.3682201-1-gavinguo@igalia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418085802.2973519-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan(a)redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest(a)google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2a47682d1ab7..47d76d03ce30 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,9 +3087,12 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and folio lock + * guarantees that it must be of the wrong folio anyway. + */ + if (folio && (pmd_migration || folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))) return; __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); }

1 week, 3 days

4
4
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051205-work-bronze-e167@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:35:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to an invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this invalid access, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421113536.3682201-1-gavinguo@igalia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418085802.2973519-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan(a)redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest(a)google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2a47682d1ab7..47d76d03ce30 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,9 +3087,12 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and folio lock + * guarantees that it must be of the wrong folio anyway. + */ + if (folio && (pmd_migration || folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))) return; __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); }

1 week, 3 days

4
4
0 0

[PATCH] Revert "drm/amd/display: more liberal vmin/vmax update for freesync"

by Aurabindo Pillai

This reverts commit 219898d29c438d8ec34a5560fac4ea8f6b8d4f20 since it causes regressions on certain configs. Revert until the issue can be isolated and debugged. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4238 Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai(a)amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> --- .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 16 +++++----------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 90889f6867aad..9f2e26336cccf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c @@ -676,21 +676,15 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params) spin_lock_irqsave(&adev_to_drm(adev)->event_lock, flags); if (acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream && - acrtc->dm_irq_params.vrr_params.supported) { - bool replay_en = acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream->link->replay_settings.replay_feature_enabled; - bool psr_en = acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream->link->psr_settings.psr_feature_enabled; - bool fs_active_var_en = acrtc->dm_irq_params.freesync_config.state == VRR_STATE_ACTIVE_VARIABLE; - + acrtc->dm_irq_params.vrr_params.supported && + acrtc->dm_irq_params.freesync_config.state == + VRR_STATE_ACTIVE_VARIABLE) { mod_freesync_handle_v_update(adev->dm.freesync_module, acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream, &acrtc->dm_irq_params.vrr_params); - /* update vmin_vmax only if freesync is enabled, or only if PSR and REPLAY are disabled */ - if (fs_active_var_en || (!fs_active_var_en && !replay_en && !psr_en)) { - dc_stream_adjust_vmin_vmax(adev->dm.dc, - acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream, - &acrtc->dm_irq_params.vrr_params.adjust); - } + dc_stream_adjust_vmin_vmax(adev->dm.dc, acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream, + &acrtc->dm_irq_params.vrr_params.adjust); } /* -- 2.49.0

1 week, 4 days

4
9
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051203-thrift-spool-ebc8@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From be6e843fc51a584672dfd9c4a6a24c8cb81d5fb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:35:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry during a deferred split scan can lead to an invalid address access, as illustrated below. To prevent this invalid access, it is necessary to check the PMD migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot be served as the target. Mailing list discussion and explanation from Hugh Dickins: "An anon_vma lookup points to a location which may contain the folio of interest, but might instead contain another folio: and weeding out those other folios is precisely what the "folio != pmd_folio((*pmd)" check (and the "risk of replacing the wrong folio" comment a few lines above it) is for." BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60 Call Trace: <TASK> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730 rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770 unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560 deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0 shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470 full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220 vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0 ksys_write+0x146/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on upstream. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250421113536.3682201-1-gavinguo@igalia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414072737.1698513-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418085802.2973519-1-gavinguo@igalia.com/ Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path") Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo(a)igalia.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan(a)redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest(a)google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe(a)huawei.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2a47682d1ab7..47d76d03ce30 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) { + bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd); + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio)); @@ -3085,9 +3087,12 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) { - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) || pmd_migration) { + /* + * Do not apply pmd_folio() to a migration entry; and folio lock + * guarantees that it must be of the wrong folio anyway. + */ + if (folio && (pmd_migration || folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))) return; __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze); }

1 week, 4 days

4
4
0 0

[REGRESSION] e1000e heavy packet loss on Meteor Lake - 6.14.2

by Marek Marczykowski-Górecki

Hi, After updating to 6.14.2, the ethernet adapter is almost unusable, I get over 30% packet loss. Bisect says it's this commit: commit 85f6414167da39e0da30bf370f1ecda5a58c6f7b Author: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits(a)intel.com> Date: Thu Mar 13 16:05:56 2025 +0200 e1000e: change k1 configuration on MTP and later platforms [ Upstream commit efaaf344bc2917cbfa5997633bc18a05d3aed27f ] Starting from Meteor Lake, the Kumeran interface between the integrated MAC and the I219 PHY works at a different frequency. This causes sporadic MDI errors when accessing the PHY, and in rare circumstances could lead to packet corruption. To overcome this, introduce minor changes to the Kumeran idle state (K1) parameters during device initialization. Hardware reset reverts this configuration, therefore it needs to be applied in a few places. Fixes: cc23f4f0b6b9 ("e1000e: Add support for Meteor Lake") Signed-off-by: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits(a)intel.com> Tested-by: Avigail Dahan <avigailx.dahan(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/defines.h | 3 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.h | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) My system is Novacustom V540TU laptop with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. And the e1000e driver is running in a Xen HVM (with PCI passthrough). Interestingly, I have also another one with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H where the issue does not happen. I don't see what is different about network adapter there, they look identical on lspci (but there are differences about other devices)... I see the commit above was already backported to other stable branches too... #regzbot introduced: 85f6414167da39e0da30bf370f1ecda5a58c6f7b -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab

1 week, 4 days

4
19
0 0

[PATCH v1 1/2] usb: xhci: Skip xhci_reset in xhci_resume if xhci is being removed

by Roy Luo

xhci_reset() currently returns -ENODEV if XHCI_STATE_REMOVING is set, without completing the xhci handshake, unless the reset completes exceptionally quickly. This behavior causes a regression on Synopsys DWC3 USB controllers with dual-role capabilities. Specifically, when a DWC3 controller exits host mode and removes xhci while a reset is still in progress, and then attempts to configure its hardware for device mode, the ongoing, incomplete reset leads to critical register access issues. All register reads return zero, not just within the xHCI register space (which might be expected during a reset), but across the entire DWC3 IP block. This patch addresses the issue by preventing xhci_reset() from being called in xhci_resume() and bailing out early in the reinit flow when XHCI_STATE_REMOVING is set. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6ccb83d6c497 ("usb: xhci: Implement xhci_handshake_check_state() helper") Suggested-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Roy Luo <royluo(a)google.com> --- drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c index 90eb491267b5..244b12eafd95 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c @@ -1084,7 +1084,10 @@ int xhci_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, bool power_lost, bool is_auto_resume) xhci_dbg(xhci, "Stop HCD\n"); xhci_halt(xhci); xhci_zero_64b_regs(xhci); - retval = xhci_reset(xhci, XHCI_RESET_LONG_USEC); + if (xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_REMOVING) + retval = -ENODEV; + else + retval = xhci_reset(xhci, XHCI_RESET_LONG_USEC); spin_unlock_irq(&xhci->lock); if (retval) return retval; -- 2.49.0.1204.g71687c7c1d-goog

1 week, 5 days

4
8
0 0

[PATCH V3 2/2] PCI: Prevent LS7A Bus Master clearing on kexec

by Huacai Chen

This is similar to commit 62b6dee1b44a ("PCI/portdrv: Prevent LS7A Bus Master clearing on shutdown"), which prevents LS7A Bus Master clearing on kexec. The key point of this is to work around the LS7A defect that clearing PCI_COMMAND_MASTER prevents MMIO requests from going downstream, and we may need to do that even after .shutdown(), e.g., to print console messages. And in this case we rely on .shutdown() for the downstream devices to disable interrupts and DMA. Only skip Bus Master clearing on bridges because endpoint devices still need it. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ming Wang <wangming01(a)loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai(a)loongson.cn> --- drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c index 602838416e6a..8a1e32367a06 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev) * If it is not a kexec reboot, firmware will hit the PCI * devices with big hammer and stop their DMA any way. */ - if (kexec_in_progress && (pci_dev->current_state <= PCI_D3hot)) + if (kexec_in_progress && !pci_is_bridge(pci_dev) && (pci_dev->current_state <= PCI_D3hot)) pci_clear_master(pci_dev); } -- 2.47.1

1 week, 5 days

3
2
0 0

[PATCH V3 1/2] PCI: Use local_pci_probe() when best selected cpu is offline

by Huacai Chen

From: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen(a)loongson.cn> When the best selected CPU is offline, work_on_cpu() will stuck forever. This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are offline (we can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it), Therefore, in this case, we should call local_pci_probe() instead of work_on_cpu(). Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai(a)loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen(a)loongson.cn> --- drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c index c8bd71a739f7..602838416e6a 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev, free_cpumask_var(wq_domain_mask); } - if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) + if ((cpu < nr_cpu_ids) && cpu_online(cpu)) error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi); else error = local_pci_probe(&ddi); -- 2.47.1

1 week, 5 days

3
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror May 2025