- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Fix size calculation for Non-Power-of-Two DIMMs" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a3f3040657417aeadb9622c629d4a0c2693a0f93 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025063041-arrival-closable-5d15@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From a3f3040657417aeadb9622c629d4a0c2693a0f93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik(a)amd.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 20:50:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Fix size calculation for Non-Power-of-Two DIMMs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Each Chip-Select (CS) of a Unified Memory Controller (UMC) on AMD Zen-based SOCs has an Address Mask and a Secondary Address Mask register associated with it. The amd64_edac module logs DIMM sizes on a per-UMC per-CS granularity during init using these two registers. Currently, the module primarily considers only the Address Mask register for computing DIMM sizes. The Secondary Address Mask register is only considered for odd CS. Additionally, if it has been considered, the Address Mask register is ignored altogether for that CS. For power-of-two DIMMs i.e. DIMMs whose total capacity is a power of two (32GB, 64GB, etc), this is not an issue since only the Address Mask register is used. For non-power-of-two DIMMs i.e., DIMMs whose total capacity is not a power of two (48GB, 96GB, etc), however, the Secondary Address Mask register is used in conjunction with the Address Mask register. However, since the module only considers either of the two registers for a CS, the size computed by the module is incorrect. The Secondary Address Mask register is not considered for even CS, and the Address Mask register is not considered for odd CS. Introduce a new helper function so that both Address Mask and Secondary Address Mask registers are considered, when valid, for computing DIMM sizes. Furthermore, also rename some variables for greater clarity. Fixes: 81f5090db843 ("EDAC/amd64: Support asymmetric dual-rank DIMMs") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dbec22b6-00f2-498b-b70d-ab6f8a5ec87e@natrix.lt Reported-by: Žilvinas Žaltiena <zilvinas(a)natrix.lt> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp(a)alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Žilvinas Žaltiena <zilvinas(a)natrix.lt> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250529205013.403450-1-avadhut.naik@amd.com diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c index b681c0663203..07f1e9dc1ca7 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c @@ -1209,7 +1209,9 @@ static int umc_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) if (csrow_enabled(2 * dimm + 1, ctrl, pvt)) cs_mode |= CS_ODD_PRIMARY; - /* Asymmetric dual-rank DIMM support. */ + if (csrow_sec_enabled(2 * dimm, ctrl, pvt)) + cs_mode |= CS_EVEN_SECONDARY; + if (csrow_sec_enabled(2 * dimm + 1, ctrl, pvt)) cs_mode |= CS_ODD_SECONDARY; @@ -1230,12 +1232,13 @@ static int umc_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) return cs_mode; } -static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, - int csrow_nr, int dimm) +static int calculate_cs_size(u32 mask, unsigned int cs_mode) { - u32 msb, weight, num_zero_bits; - u32 addr_mask_deinterleaved; - int size = 0; + int msb, weight, num_zero_bits; + u32 deinterleaved_mask; + + if (!mask) + return 0; /* * The number of zero bits in the mask is equal to the number of bits @@ -1248,19 +1251,30 @@ static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, * without swapping with the most significant bit. This can be handled * by keeping the MSB where it is and ignoring the single zero bit. */ - msb = fls(addr_mask_orig) - 1; - weight = hweight_long(addr_mask_orig); + msb = fls(mask) - 1; + weight = hweight_long(mask); num_zero_bits = msb - weight - !!(cs_mode & CS_3R_INTERLEAVE); /* Take the number of zero bits off from the top of the mask. */ - addr_mask_deinterleaved = GENMASK_ULL(msb - num_zero_bits, 1); + deinterleaved_mask = GENMASK(msb - num_zero_bits, 1); + edac_dbg(1, " Deinterleaved AddrMask: 0x%x\n", deinterleaved_mask); + + return (deinterleaved_mask >> 2) + 1; +} + +static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask, u32 addr_mask_sec, + unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr, int dimm) +{ + int size; edac_dbg(1, "CS%d DIMM%d AddrMasks:\n", csrow_nr, dimm); - edac_dbg(1, " Original AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_orig); - edac_dbg(1, " Deinterleaved AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_deinterleaved); + edac_dbg(1, " Primary AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask); /* Register [31:1] = Address [39:9]. Size is in kBs here. */ - size = (addr_mask_deinterleaved >> 2) + 1; + size = calculate_cs_size(addr_mask, cs_mode); + + edac_dbg(1, " Secondary AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_sec); + size += calculate_cs_size(addr_mask_sec, cs_mode); /* Return size in MBs. */ return size >> 10; @@ -1269,8 +1283,8 @@ static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, static int umc_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr) { + u32 addr_mask = 0, addr_mask_sec = 0; int cs_mask_nr = csrow_nr; - u32 addr_mask_orig; int dimm, size = 0; /* No Chip Selects are enabled. */ @@ -1308,13 +1322,13 @@ static int umc_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, if (!pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2) cs_mask_nr >>= 1; - /* Asymmetric dual-rank DIMM support. */ - if ((csrow_nr & 1) && (cs_mode & CS_ODD_SECONDARY)) - addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[cs_mask_nr]; - else - addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs_mask_nr]; + if (cs_mode & (CS_EVEN_PRIMARY | CS_ODD_PRIMARY)) + addr_mask = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs_mask_nr]; - return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask_orig, cs_mode, csrow_nr, dimm); + if (cs_mode & (CS_EVEN_SECONDARY | CS_ODD_SECONDARY)) + addr_mask_sec = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[cs_mask_nr]; + + return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask, addr_mask_sec, cs_mode, csrow_nr, dimm); } static void umc_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl) @@ -3512,9 +3526,10 @@ static void gpu_get_err_info(struct mce *m, struct err_info *err) static int gpu_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr) { - u32 addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; + u32 addr_mask = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; + u32 addr_mask_sec = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[csrow_nr]; - return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask_orig, cs_mode, csrow_nr, csrow_nr >> 1); + return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask, addr_mask_sec, cs_mode, csrow_nr, csrow_nr >> 1); } static void gpu_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)

3 days, 1 hour

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Fix size calculation for Non-Power-of-Two DIMMs" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a3f3040657417aeadb9622c629d4a0c2693a0f93 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025063036-washroom-swiftness-1860@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From a3f3040657417aeadb9622c629d4a0c2693a0f93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik(a)amd.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 20:50:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Fix size calculation for Non-Power-of-Two DIMMs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Each Chip-Select (CS) of a Unified Memory Controller (UMC) on AMD Zen-based SOCs has an Address Mask and a Secondary Address Mask register associated with it. The amd64_edac module logs DIMM sizes on a per-UMC per-CS granularity during init using these two registers. Currently, the module primarily considers only the Address Mask register for computing DIMM sizes. The Secondary Address Mask register is only considered for odd CS. Additionally, if it has been considered, the Address Mask register is ignored altogether for that CS. For power-of-two DIMMs i.e. DIMMs whose total capacity is a power of two (32GB, 64GB, etc), this is not an issue since only the Address Mask register is used. For non-power-of-two DIMMs i.e., DIMMs whose total capacity is not a power of two (48GB, 96GB, etc), however, the Secondary Address Mask register is used in conjunction with the Address Mask register. However, since the module only considers either of the two registers for a CS, the size computed by the module is incorrect. The Secondary Address Mask register is not considered for even CS, and the Address Mask register is not considered for odd CS. Introduce a new helper function so that both Address Mask and Secondary Address Mask registers are considered, when valid, for computing DIMM sizes. Furthermore, also rename some variables for greater clarity. Fixes: 81f5090db843 ("EDAC/amd64: Support asymmetric dual-rank DIMMs") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dbec22b6-00f2-498b-b70d-ab6f8a5ec87e@natrix.lt Reported-by: Žilvinas Žaltiena <zilvinas(a)natrix.lt> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp(a)alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Žilvinas Žaltiena <zilvinas(a)natrix.lt> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250529205013.403450-1-avadhut.naik@amd.com diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c index b681c0663203..07f1e9dc1ca7 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c @@ -1209,7 +1209,9 @@ static int umc_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) if (csrow_enabled(2 * dimm + 1, ctrl, pvt)) cs_mode |= CS_ODD_PRIMARY; - /* Asymmetric dual-rank DIMM support. */ + if (csrow_sec_enabled(2 * dimm, ctrl, pvt)) + cs_mode |= CS_EVEN_SECONDARY; + if (csrow_sec_enabled(2 * dimm + 1, ctrl, pvt)) cs_mode |= CS_ODD_SECONDARY; @@ -1230,12 +1232,13 @@ static int umc_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) return cs_mode; } -static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, - int csrow_nr, int dimm) +static int calculate_cs_size(u32 mask, unsigned int cs_mode) { - u32 msb, weight, num_zero_bits; - u32 addr_mask_deinterleaved; - int size = 0; + int msb, weight, num_zero_bits; + u32 deinterleaved_mask; + + if (!mask) + return 0; /* * The number of zero bits in the mask is equal to the number of bits @@ -1248,19 +1251,30 @@ static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, * without swapping with the most significant bit. This can be handled * by keeping the MSB where it is and ignoring the single zero bit. */ - msb = fls(addr_mask_orig) - 1; - weight = hweight_long(addr_mask_orig); + msb = fls(mask) - 1; + weight = hweight_long(mask); num_zero_bits = msb - weight - !!(cs_mode & CS_3R_INTERLEAVE); /* Take the number of zero bits off from the top of the mask. */ - addr_mask_deinterleaved = GENMASK_ULL(msb - num_zero_bits, 1); + deinterleaved_mask = GENMASK(msb - num_zero_bits, 1); + edac_dbg(1, " Deinterleaved AddrMask: 0x%x\n", deinterleaved_mask); + + return (deinterleaved_mask >> 2) + 1; +} + +static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask, u32 addr_mask_sec, + unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr, int dimm) +{ + int size; edac_dbg(1, "CS%d DIMM%d AddrMasks:\n", csrow_nr, dimm); - edac_dbg(1, " Original AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_orig); - edac_dbg(1, " Deinterleaved AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_deinterleaved); + edac_dbg(1, " Primary AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask); /* Register [31:1] = Address [39:9]. Size is in kBs here. */ - size = (addr_mask_deinterleaved >> 2) + 1; + size = calculate_cs_size(addr_mask, cs_mode); + + edac_dbg(1, " Secondary AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_sec); + size += calculate_cs_size(addr_mask_sec, cs_mode); /* Return size in MBs. */ return size >> 10; @@ -1269,8 +1283,8 @@ static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, static int umc_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr) { + u32 addr_mask = 0, addr_mask_sec = 0; int cs_mask_nr = csrow_nr; - u32 addr_mask_orig; int dimm, size = 0; /* No Chip Selects are enabled. */ @@ -1308,13 +1322,13 @@ static int umc_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, if (!pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2) cs_mask_nr >>= 1; - /* Asymmetric dual-rank DIMM support. */ - if ((csrow_nr & 1) && (cs_mode & CS_ODD_SECONDARY)) - addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[cs_mask_nr]; - else - addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs_mask_nr]; + if (cs_mode & (CS_EVEN_PRIMARY | CS_ODD_PRIMARY)) + addr_mask = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs_mask_nr]; - return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask_orig, cs_mode, csrow_nr, dimm); + if (cs_mode & (CS_EVEN_SECONDARY | CS_ODD_SECONDARY)) + addr_mask_sec = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[cs_mask_nr]; + + return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask, addr_mask_sec, cs_mode, csrow_nr, dimm); } static void umc_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl) @@ -3512,9 +3526,10 @@ static void gpu_get_err_info(struct mce *m, struct err_info *err) static int gpu_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr) { - u32 addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; + u32 addr_mask = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; + u32 addr_mask_sec = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[csrow_nr]; - return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask_orig, cs_mode, csrow_nr, csrow_nr >> 1); + return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask, addr_mask_sec, cs_mode, csrow_nr, csrow_nr >> 1); } static void gpu_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)

3 days, 1 hour

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Fix size calculation for Non-Power-of-Two DIMMs" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a3f3040657417aeadb9622c629d4a0c2693a0f93 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025063027-delighted-selection-2dde@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From a3f3040657417aeadb9622c629d4a0c2693a0f93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik(a)amd.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 20:50:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Fix size calculation for Non-Power-of-Two DIMMs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Each Chip-Select (CS) of a Unified Memory Controller (UMC) on AMD Zen-based SOCs has an Address Mask and a Secondary Address Mask register associated with it. The amd64_edac module logs DIMM sizes on a per-UMC per-CS granularity during init using these two registers. Currently, the module primarily considers only the Address Mask register for computing DIMM sizes. The Secondary Address Mask register is only considered for odd CS. Additionally, if it has been considered, the Address Mask register is ignored altogether for that CS. For power-of-two DIMMs i.e. DIMMs whose total capacity is a power of two (32GB, 64GB, etc), this is not an issue since only the Address Mask register is used. For non-power-of-two DIMMs i.e., DIMMs whose total capacity is not a power of two (48GB, 96GB, etc), however, the Secondary Address Mask register is used in conjunction with the Address Mask register. However, since the module only considers either of the two registers for a CS, the size computed by the module is incorrect. The Secondary Address Mask register is not considered for even CS, and the Address Mask register is not considered for odd CS. Introduce a new helper function so that both Address Mask and Secondary Address Mask registers are considered, when valid, for computing DIMM sizes. Furthermore, also rename some variables for greater clarity. Fixes: 81f5090db843 ("EDAC/amd64: Support asymmetric dual-rank DIMMs") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dbec22b6-00f2-498b-b70d-ab6f8a5ec87e@natrix.lt Reported-by: Žilvinas Žaltiena <zilvinas(a)natrix.lt> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp(a)alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Žilvinas Žaltiena <zilvinas(a)natrix.lt> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250529205013.403450-1-avadhut.naik@amd.com diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c index b681c0663203..07f1e9dc1ca7 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c @@ -1209,7 +1209,9 @@ static int umc_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) if (csrow_enabled(2 * dimm + 1, ctrl, pvt)) cs_mode |= CS_ODD_PRIMARY; - /* Asymmetric dual-rank DIMM support. */ + if (csrow_sec_enabled(2 * dimm, ctrl, pvt)) + cs_mode |= CS_EVEN_SECONDARY; + if (csrow_sec_enabled(2 * dimm + 1, ctrl, pvt)) cs_mode |= CS_ODD_SECONDARY; @@ -1230,12 +1232,13 @@ static int umc_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) return cs_mode; } -static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, - int csrow_nr, int dimm) +static int calculate_cs_size(u32 mask, unsigned int cs_mode) { - u32 msb, weight, num_zero_bits; - u32 addr_mask_deinterleaved; - int size = 0; + int msb, weight, num_zero_bits; + u32 deinterleaved_mask; + + if (!mask) + return 0; /* * The number of zero bits in the mask is equal to the number of bits @@ -1248,19 +1251,30 @@ static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, * without swapping with the most significant bit. This can be handled * by keeping the MSB where it is and ignoring the single zero bit. */ - msb = fls(addr_mask_orig) - 1; - weight = hweight_long(addr_mask_orig); + msb = fls(mask) - 1; + weight = hweight_long(mask); num_zero_bits = msb - weight - !!(cs_mode & CS_3R_INTERLEAVE); /* Take the number of zero bits off from the top of the mask. */ - addr_mask_deinterleaved = GENMASK_ULL(msb - num_zero_bits, 1); + deinterleaved_mask = GENMASK(msb - num_zero_bits, 1); + edac_dbg(1, " Deinterleaved AddrMask: 0x%x\n", deinterleaved_mask); + + return (deinterleaved_mask >> 2) + 1; +} + +static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask, u32 addr_mask_sec, + unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr, int dimm) +{ + int size; edac_dbg(1, "CS%d DIMM%d AddrMasks:\n", csrow_nr, dimm); - edac_dbg(1, " Original AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_orig); - edac_dbg(1, " Deinterleaved AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_deinterleaved); + edac_dbg(1, " Primary AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask); /* Register [31:1] = Address [39:9]. Size is in kBs here. */ - size = (addr_mask_deinterleaved >> 2) + 1; + size = calculate_cs_size(addr_mask, cs_mode); + + edac_dbg(1, " Secondary AddrMask: 0x%x\n", addr_mask_sec); + size += calculate_cs_size(addr_mask_sec, cs_mode); /* Return size in MBs. */ return size >> 10; @@ -1269,8 +1283,8 @@ static int __addr_mask_to_cs_size(u32 addr_mask_orig, unsigned int cs_mode, static int umc_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr) { + u32 addr_mask = 0, addr_mask_sec = 0; int cs_mask_nr = csrow_nr; - u32 addr_mask_orig; int dimm, size = 0; /* No Chip Selects are enabled. */ @@ -1308,13 +1322,13 @@ static int umc_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, if (!pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2) cs_mask_nr >>= 1; - /* Asymmetric dual-rank DIMM support. */ - if ((csrow_nr & 1) && (cs_mode & CS_ODD_SECONDARY)) - addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[cs_mask_nr]; - else - addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs_mask_nr]; + if (cs_mode & (CS_EVEN_PRIMARY | CS_ODD_PRIMARY)) + addr_mask = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs_mask_nr]; - return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask_orig, cs_mode, csrow_nr, dimm); + if (cs_mode & (CS_EVEN_SECONDARY | CS_ODD_SECONDARY)) + addr_mask_sec = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[cs_mask_nr]; + + return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask, addr_mask_sec, cs_mode, csrow_nr, dimm); } static void umc_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl) @@ -3512,9 +3526,10 @@ static void gpu_get_err_info(struct mce *m, struct err_info *err) static int gpu_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, unsigned int cs_mode, int csrow_nr) { - u32 addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; + u32 addr_mask = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; + u32 addr_mask_sec = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks_sec[csrow_nr]; - return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask_orig, cs_mode, csrow_nr, csrow_nr >> 1); + return __addr_mask_to_cs_size(addr_mask, addr_mask_sec, cs_mode, csrow_nr, csrow_nr >> 1); } static void gpu_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)

3 days, 1 hour

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: use cs-gpios for spi1 on ringneck

by Jakob Unterwurzacher

From: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher(a)cherry.de> Hardware CS has a very slow rise time of about 6us, causing transmission errors when CS does not reach high between transaction. It looks like it's not driven actively when transitioning from low to high but switched to input, so only the CPU pull-up pulls it high, slowly. Transitions from high to low are fast. On the oscilloscope, CS looks like an irregular sawtooth pattern like this: _____ ^ / | ^ /| / | /| / | / | / | / | / | ___/ |___/ |_____/ |___ With cs-gpios we have a CS rise time of about 20ns, as it should be, and CS looks rectangular. This fixes the data errors when running a flashcp loop against a m25p40 spi flash. With the Rockchip 6.1 kernel we see the same slow rise time, but for some reason CS is always high for long enough to reach a solid high. The RK3399 and RK3588 SoCs use the same SPI driver, so we also checked our "Puma" (RK3399) and "Tiger" (RK3588) boards. They do not have this problem. Hardware CS rise time is good. Fixes: c484cf93f61b ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PX30-µQ7 (Ringneck) SoM with Haikou baseboard") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz(a)cherry.de> Signed-off-by: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher(a)cherry.de> --- v2: * Rename spi1_csn0_gpio -> spi1_csn0_gpio_pin to make CHECK_DTBS=y happy * Add pinctrl-names = "default"; v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250620113549.2900285-1-jakob.unterwurzacher@c… .../boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi index ab232e5c7ad6..4203b335a263 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi @@ -379,6 +379,18 @@ pmic_int: pmic-int { <0 RK_PA7 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>; }; }; + + spi1 { + spi1_csn0_gpio_pin: spi1-csn0-gpio-pin { + rockchip,pins = + <3 RK_PB1 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up_4ma>; + }; + + spi1_csn1_gpio_pin: spi1-csn1-gpio-pin { + rockchip,pins = + <3 RK_PB2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up_4ma>; + }; + }; }; &pmu_io_domains { @@ -396,6 +408,17 @@ &sdmmc { vqmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>; }; +&spi1 { + /* + * Hardware CS has a very slow rise time of about 6us, + * causing transmission errors. + * With cs-gpios we have a rise time of about 20ns. + */ + cs-gpios = <&gpio3 RK_PB1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, <&gpio3 RK_PB2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&spi1_clk &spi1_csn0_gpio_pin &spi1_csn1_gpio_pin &spi1_miso &spi1_mosi>; +}; + &tsadc { status = "okay"; }; -- 2.39.5

3 days, 1 hour

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v2 10/16] ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan switch

by Baokun Li

The grp->bb_largest_free_order is updated regardless of whether mb_optimize_scan is enabled. This can lead to inconsistencies between grp->bb_largest_free_order and the actual s_mb_largest_free_orders list index when mb_optimize_scan is repeatedly enabled and disabled via remount. For example, if mb_optimize_scan is initially enabled, largest free order is 3, and the group is in s_mb_largest_free_orders[3]. Then, mb_optimize_scan is disabled via remount, block allocations occur, updating largest free order to 2. Finally, mb_optimize_scan is re-enabled via remount, more block allocations update largest free order to 1. At this point, the group would be removed from s_mb_largest_free_orders[3] under the protection of s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[2]. This lock mismatch can lead to list corruption. To fix this, a new field bb_largest_free_order_idx is added to struct ext4_group_info to explicitly track the list index. Then still update bb_largest_free_order unconditionally, but only update bb_largest_free_order_idx when mb_optimize_scan is enabled. so that there is no inconsistency between the lock and the data to be protected. Fixes: 196e402adf2e ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 + fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h index 003b8d3726e8..0e574378c6a3 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h @@ -3476,6 +3476,7 @@ struct ext4_group_info { int bb_avg_fragment_size_order; /* order of average fragment in BG */ ext4_grpblk_t bb_largest_free_order;/* order of largest frag in BG */ + ext4_grpblk_t bb_largest_free_order_idx; /* index of largest frag */ ext4_group_t bb_group; /* Group number */ struct list_head bb_prealloc_list; #ifdef DOUBLE_CHECK diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index e6d6c2da3c6e..dc82124f0905 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -1152,33 +1152,29 @@ static void mb_set_largest_free_order(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); - int i; + int new, old = grp->bb_largest_free_order_idx; - for (i = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; i >= 0; i--) - if (grp->bb_counters[i] > 0) + for (new = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; new >= 0; new--) + if (grp->bb_counters[new] > 0) break; + + grp->bb_largest_free_order = new; /* No need to move between order lists? */ - if (!test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN) || - i == grp->bb_largest_free_order) { - grp->bb_largest_free_order = i; + if (!test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN) || new == old) return; - } - if (grp->bb_largest_free_order >= 0) { - write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ - grp->bb_largest_free_order]); + if (old >= 0) { + write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[old]); list_del_init(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node); - write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ - grp->bb_largest_free_order]); + write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[old]); } - grp->bb_largest_free_order = i; - if (grp->bb_largest_free_order >= 0 && grp->bb_free) { - write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ - grp->bb_largest_free_order]); + + grp->bb_largest_free_order_idx = new; + if (new >= 0 && grp->bb_free) { + write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[new]); list_add_tail(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node, - &sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders[grp->bb_largest_free_order]); - write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ - grp->bb_largest_free_order]); + &sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders[new]); + write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[new]); } } @@ -3391,6 +3387,7 @@ int ext4_mb_add_groupinfo(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&meta_group_info[i]->bb_avg_fragment_size_node); meta_group_info[i]->bb_largest_free_order = -1; /* uninit */ meta_group_info[i]->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = -1; /* uninit */ + meta_group_info[i]->bb_largest_free_order_idx = -1; /* uninit */ meta_group_info[i]->bb_group = group; mb_group_bb_bitmap_alloc(sb, meta_group_info[i], group); -- 2.46.1

3 days, 2 hours

2
2
0 0

[PATCH 0/2] Add dma-coherent for gs101 UFS dt node

by Peter Griffin

ufs-exynos driver enables the shareability option for gs101 which means the descriptors need to be allocated as cacheable. Fix the DT node and update bindings to add the dma-coherent property. This fixes the UFS stability issues we have seen with the upstream UFS driver. Note this DT fix can go in independently of the other UFS fixes series I sent recently [1], as the bootloader already leaves the sharability bits enabled. regards, Peter [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20250226220414.343659-1-peter.griffin@li… To: André Draszik <andre.draszik(a)linaro.org> To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus(a)linaro.org> To: Rob Herring <robh(a)kernel.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt(a)kernel.org> To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt(a)kernel.org> To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar(a)samsung.com> To: Avri Altman <avri.altman(a)wdc.com> To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> To: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen(a)oracle.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel-team(a)android.com Cc: willmcvicker(a)google.com Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin(a)linaro.org> --- Peter Griffin (2): arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: ufs: add dma-coherent property scsi: ufs: dt-bindings: exynos: add dma-coherent property for gs101 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml | 2 ++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) --- base-commit: b323d8e7bc03d27dec646bfdccb7d1a92411f189 change-id: 20250314-ufs-dma-coherent-980f2467690d Best regards, -- Peter Griffin <peter.griffin(a)linaro.org>

3 days, 3 hours

6
13
0 0

[PATCH v2 09/16] ext4: fix zombie groups in average fragment size lists

by Baokun Li

Groups with no free blocks shouldn't be in any average fragment size list. However, when all blocks in a group are allocated(i.e., bb_fragments or bb_free is 0), we currently skip updating the average fragment size, which means the group isn't removed from its previous s_mb_avg_fragment_size[old] list. This created "zombie" groups that were always skipped during traversal as they couldn't satisfy any block allocation requests, negatively impacting traversal efficiency. Therefore, when a group becomes completely free, bb_avg_fragment_size_order is now set to -1. If the old order was not -1, a removal operation is performed; if the new order is not -1, an insertion is performed. Fixes: 196e402adf2e ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 94950b07a577..e6d6c2da3c6e 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -841,30 +841,30 @@ static void mb_update_avg_fragment_size(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); - int new_order; + int new, old; - if (!test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN) || grp->bb_fragments == 0) + if (!test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN)) return; - new_order = mb_avg_fragment_size_order(sb, - grp->bb_free / grp->bb_fragments); - if (new_order == grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order) + old = grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order; + new = grp->bb_fragments == 0 ? -1 : + mb_avg_fragment_size_order(sb, grp->bb_free / grp->bb_fragments); + if (new == old) return; - if (grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order != -1) { - write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[ - grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order]); + if (old >= 0) { + write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[old]); list_del(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node); - write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[ - grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order]); - } - grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = new_order; - write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[ - grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order]); - list_add_tail(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node, - &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order]); - write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[ - grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order]); + write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[old]); + } + + grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = new; + if (new >= 0) { + write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[new]); + list_add_tail(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node, + &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[new]); + write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[new]); + } } /* -- 2.46.1

3 days, 3 hours

2
2
0 0

Re: Patch "ASoC: codec: wcd9335: Convert to GPIO descriptors" has been added to the 6.15-stable tree

by Bartosz Golaszewski

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 4:04 PM Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > ASoC: codec: wcd9335: Convert to GPIO descriptors > > to the 6.15-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… > > The filename of the patch is: > asoc-codec-wcd9335-convert-to-gpio-descriptors.patch > and it can be found in the queue-6.15 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. > > Why is this being backported to stable? It's not a fix, just refactoring and updating to a more modern API. Bart

3 days, 3 hours

2
2
0 0

[PATCH] nvmet: fix memory leak of bio integrity

by Dmitry Bogdanov

If nvmet receives commands with metadata there is a continuous memory leak of kmalloc-128 slab or more precisely bio->bi_integrity. Since that [1] patch series the integrity is not get free at bio_end_io for submitter owned integrity. It has to free explicitly. After commit bf4c89fc8797 ("block: don't call bio_uninit from bio_endio") each user of bio_init has to use bio_uninit as well. Otherwise the bio integrity is not getting free. Nvmet uses bio_init for inline bios. Uninit the inline bio to complete deallocation of integrity in bio. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240702151047.1746127-1-hch@lst.de/ Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.11 Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov(a)yadro.com> --- drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h index df69a9dee71c..51df72f5e89b 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h @@ -867,6 +867,8 @@ static inline void nvmet_req_bio_put(struct nvmet_req *req, struct bio *bio) { if (bio != &req->b.inline_bio) bio_put(bio); + else + bio_uninit(bio); } #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS -- 2.25.1

3 days, 3 hours

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v3] lib/alloc_tag: do not acquire non-existent lock in alloc_tag_top_users()

by Harry Yoo

alloc_tag_top_users() attempts to lock alloc_tag_cttype->mod_lock even when the alloc_tag_cttype is not allocated because: 1) alloc tagging is disabled because mem profiling is disabled (!alloc_tag_cttype) 2) alloc tagging is enabled, but not yet initialized (!alloc_tag_cttype) 3) alloc tagging is enabled, but failed initialization (!alloc_tag_cttype or IS_ERR(alloc_tag_cttype)) In all cases, alloc_tag_cttype is not allocated, and therefore alloc_tag_top_users() should not attempt to acquire the semaphore. This leads to a crash on memory allocation failure by attempting to acquire a non-existent semaphore: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000001b: 0000 [#3] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000d8-0x00000000000000df] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G D 6.16.0-rc2 #1 VOLUNTARY Tainted: [D]=DIE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:down_read_trylock+0xaa/0x3b0 Code: d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 a0 02 00 00 8b 0d df 31 dd 04 85 c9 75 29 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8d 6b 68 48 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 88 02 00 00 48 3b 5b 68 0f 85 53 01 00 00 65 ff RSP: 0000:ffff8881002ce9b8 EFLAGS: 00010016 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000070 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000001b RSI: 000000000000000a RDI: 0000000000000070 RBP: 00000000000000d8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed107dde49d1 R10: ffff8883eef24e8b R11: ffff8881002cec20 R12: 1ffff11020059d37 R13: 00000000003fff7b R14: ffff8881002cec20 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f963f21d940(0000) GS:ffff888458ca6000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f963f5edf71 CR3: 000000010672c000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> codetag_trylock_module_list+0xd/0x20 alloc_tag_top_users+0x369/0x4b0 __show_mem+0x1cd/0x6e0 warn_alloc+0x2b1/0x390 __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x12b9/0x21a0 alloc_pages_mpol+0x135/0x3e0 alloc_slab_page+0x82/0xe0 new_slab+0x212/0x240 ___slab_alloc+0x82a/0xe00 </TASK> As David Wang points out, this issue became easier to trigger after commit 780138b12381 ("alloc_tag: check mem_profiling_support in alloc_tag_init"). Before the commit, the issue occurred only when it failed to allocate and initialize alloc_tag_cttype or if a memory allocation fails before alloc_tag_init() is called. After the commit, it can be easily triggered when memory profiling is compiled but disabled at boot. To properly determine whether alloc_tag_init() has been called and its data structures initialized, verify that alloc_tag_cttype is a valid pointer before acquiring the semaphore. If the variable is NULL or an error value, it has not been properly initialized. In such a case, just skip and do not attempt to acquire the semaphore. Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang(a)intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202506181351.bba867dd-lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202506131711.5b41931c-lkp@intel.com Fixes: 780138b12381 ("alloc_tag: check mem_profiling_support in alloc_tag_init") Fixes: 1438d349d16b ("lib: add memory allocations report in show_mem()") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo(a)oracle.com> --- @Suren: I did not add another pr_warn() because every error path in alloc_tag_init() already has pr_err(). v2 -> v3: - Added another Closes: tag (David) - Moved the condition into a standalone if block for better readability (Suren) - Typo fix (Suren) lib/alloc_tag.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c index 41ccfb035b7b..e9b33848700a 100644 --- a/lib/alloc_tag.c +++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c @@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ size_t alloc_tag_top_users(struct codetag_bytes *tags, size_t count, bool can_sl struct codetag_bytes n; unsigned int i, nr = 0; + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(alloc_tag_cttype)) + return 0; + if (can_sleep) codetag_lock_module_list(alloc_tag_cttype, true); else if (!codetag_trylock_module_list(alloc_tag_cttype)) -- 2.43.0

3 days, 4 hours

4
21
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror