The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062029-saturday-conical-0eae@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:28:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could
linger
Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a
parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical race
as such:
"""
Nadav Amit identified a theoretical race between page reclaim and mprotect
due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.
He described the race as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
user accesses memory using RW PTE
[PTE now cached in TLB]
try_to_unmap_one()
==> ptep_get_and_clear()
==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
==> change_pte_range()
==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]
user writes using cached RW PTE
...
try_to_unmap_flush()
The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such as
munmap, mremap and madvise.
"""
The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any pending
tlb flushes.
However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the PTL,
they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if they
stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
not. Let's fix that.
There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().
This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman <mgorman(a)suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 5f7a66a1617e..1d44a35ae85c 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
@@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
start_pte = pte;
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062028-richly-basket-a70f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:28:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could
linger
Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a
parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical race
as such:
"""
Nadav Amit identified a theoretical race between page reclaim and mprotect
due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.
He described the race as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
user accesses memory using RW PTE
[PTE now cached in TLB]
try_to_unmap_one()
==> ptep_get_and_clear()
==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
==> change_pte_range()
==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]
user writes using cached RW PTE
...
try_to_unmap_flush()
The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such as
munmap, mremap and madvise.
"""
The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any pending
tlb flushes.
However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the PTL,
they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if they
stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
not. Let's fix that.
There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().
This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman <mgorman(a)suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 5f7a66a1617e..1d44a35ae85c 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
@@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
start_pte = pte;
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062027-tapestry-uptake-5f29@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:28:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could
linger
Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a
parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical race
as such:
"""
Nadav Amit identified a theoretical race between page reclaim and mprotect
due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.
He described the race as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
user accesses memory using RW PTE
[PTE now cached in TLB]
try_to_unmap_one()
==> ptep_get_and_clear()
==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
==> change_pte_range()
==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]
user writes using cached RW PTE
...
try_to_unmap_flush()
The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such as
munmap, mremap and madvise.
"""
The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any pending
tlb flushes.
However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the PTL,
they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if they
stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
not. Let's fix that.
There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().
This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman <mgorman(a)suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 5f7a66a1617e..1d44a35ae85c 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
@@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
start_pte = pte;
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062026-shrewdly-trough-b30e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:28:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could
linger
Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a
parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical race
as such:
"""
Nadav Amit identified a theoretical race between page reclaim and mprotect
due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.
He described the race as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
user accesses memory using RW PTE
[PTE now cached in TLB]
try_to_unmap_one()
==> ptep_get_and_clear()
==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
==> change_pte_range()
==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]
user writes using cached RW PTE
...
try_to_unmap_flush()
The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such as
munmap, mremap and madvise.
"""
The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any pending
tlb flushes.
However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the PTL,
they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if they
stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
not. Let's fix that.
There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().
This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman <mgorman(a)suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 5f7a66a1617e..1d44a35ae85c 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
@@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
start_pte = pte;
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062025-boogieman-flyable-ee70@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 383c4613c67c26e90e8eebb72e3083457d02033f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:28:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could
linger
Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a
parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical race
as such:
"""
Nadav Amit identified a theoretical race between page reclaim and mprotect
due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.
He described the race as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
user accesses memory using RW PTE
[PTE now cached in TLB]
try_to_unmap_one()
==> ptep_get_and_clear()
==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
==> change_pte_range()
==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]
user writes using cached RW PTE
...
try_to_unmap_flush()
The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such as
munmap, mremap and madvise.
"""
The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any pending
tlb flushes.
However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the PTL,
they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if they
stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
not. Let's fix that.
There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().
This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman <mgorman(a)suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 5f7a66a1617e..1d44a35ae85c 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
@@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
start_pte = pte;
if (!start_pte)
break;
+ flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
if (!err)
nr = 0;
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 7ca52541c05c832d32b112274f81a985101f9ba8
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062026-excitable-trunks-92e6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7ca52541c05c832d32b112274f81a985101f9ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:35:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net_sched: sch_sfq: reject invalid perturb period
Gerrard Tai reported that SFQ perturb_period has no range check yet,
and this can be used to trigger a race condition fixed in a separate patch.
We want to make sure ctl->perturb_period * HZ will not overflow
and is positive.
Tested:
tc qd add dev lo root sfq perturb -10 # negative value : error
Error: sch_sfq: invalid perturb period.
tc qd add dev lo root sfq perturb 1000000000 # too big : error
Error: sch_sfq: invalid perturb period.
tc qd add dev lo root sfq perturb 2000000 # acceptable value
tc -s -d qd sh dev lo
qdisc sfq 8005: root refcnt 2 limit 127p quantum 64Kb depth 127 flows 128 divisor 1024 perturb 2000000sec
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: Gerrard Tai <gerrard.tai(a)starlabs.sg>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250611083501.1810459-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 77fa02f2bfcd..a8cca549b5a2 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -656,6 +656,14 @@ static int sfq_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "invalid quantum");
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ if (ctl->perturb_period < 0 ||
+ ctl->perturb_period > INT_MAX / HZ) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "invalid perturb period");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ perturb_period = ctl->perturb_period * HZ;
+
if (ctl_v1 && !red_check_params(ctl_v1->qth_min, ctl_v1->qth_max,
ctl_v1->Wlog, ctl_v1->Scell_log, NULL))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -672,14 +680,12 @@ static int sfq_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
headdrop = q->headdrop;
maxdepth = q->maxdepth;
maxflows = q->maxflows;
- perturb_period = q->perturb_period;
quantum = q->quantum;
flags = q->flags;
/* update and validate configuration */
if (ctl->quantum)
quantum = ctl->quantum;
- perturb_period = ctl->perturb_period * HZ;
if (ctl->flows)
maxflows = min_t(u32, ctl->flows, SFQ_MAX_FLOWS);
if (ctl->divisor) {
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 7ca52541c05c832d32b112274f81a985101f9ba8
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062026-stinger-coeditor-bb58@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7ca52541c05c832d32b112274f81a985101f9ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:35:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net_sched: sch_sfq: reject invalid perturb period
Gerrard Tai reported that SFQ perturb_period has no range check yet,
and this can be used to trigger a race condition fixed in a separate patch.
We want to make sure ctl->perturb_period * HZ will not overflow
and is positive.
Tested:
tc qd add dev lo root sfq perturb -10 # negative value : error
Error: sch_sfq: invalid perturb period.
tc qd add dev lo root sfq perturb 1000000000 # too big : error
Error: sch_sfq: invalid perturb period.
tc qd add dev lo root sfq perturb 2000000 # acceptable value
tc -s -d qd sh dev lo
qdisc sfq 8005: root refcnt 2 limit 127p quantum 64Kb depth 127 flows 128 divisor 1024 perturb 2000000sec
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: Gerrard Tai <gerrard.tai(a)starlabs.sg>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250611083501.1810459-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 77fa02f2bfcd..a8cca549b5a2 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -656,6 +656,14 @@ static int sfq_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "invalid quantum");
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ if (ctl->perturb_period < 0 ||
+ ctl->perturb_period > INT_MAX / HZ) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "invalid perturb period");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ perturb_period = ctl->perturb_period * HZ;
+
if (ctl_v1 && !red_check_params(ctl_v1->qth_min, ctl_v1->qth_max,
ctl_v1->Wlog, ctl_v1->Scell_log, NULL))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -672,14 +680,12 @@ static int sfq_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
headdrop = q->headdrop;
maxdepth = q->maxdepth;
maxflows = q->maxflows;
- perturb_period = q->perturb_period;
quantum = q->quantum;
flags = q->flags;
/* update and validate configuration */
if (ctl->quantum)
quantum = ctl->quantum;
- perturb_period = ctl->perturb_period * HZ;
if (ctl->flows)
maxflows = min_t(u32, ctl->flows, SFQ_MAX_FLOWS);
if (ctl->divisor) {