- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

Patch "signal/arm: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled signal/arm: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: signal-arm-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 10:16:32 CEST 2018 From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:07:46 -0500 Subject: signal/arm: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> [ Upstream commit 7771c66457004977b616bab785209f49d164f527 ] Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME, siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: Russell King <rmk(a)flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org Ref: 451436b7bbb2 ("[ARM] Add support code for ARM hardware vector floating point") History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 13 +++++++++++++ arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +#ifndef __ASM_SIGINFO_H +#define __ASM_SIGINFO_H + +#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h> + +/* + * SIGFPE si_codes + */ +#ifdef __KERNEL__ +#define FPE_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */ +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ + +#endif --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exc if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) { vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst); - vfp_raise_sigfpe(0, regs); + vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs); return; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiederm(a)xmission.com are queue-4.15/signal-metag-document-a-conflict-with-si_user-with-sigfpe.patch queue-4.15/signal-arm-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe.patch queue-4.15/signal-powerpc-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe-and-sigtrap.patch

7 years, 6 months

2
1
0 0

Patch "signal/powerpc: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE and SIGTRAP" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled signal/powerpc: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE and SIGTRAP to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: signal-powerpc-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe-and-sigtrap.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 10:16:32 CEST 2018 From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:26:01 -0500 Subject: signal/powerpc: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE and SIGTRAP From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> [ Upstream commit cf4674c46c66e45f238f8f7e81af2a444b970c0a ] Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME and TRAP_FIXME, siginfo_layout() will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus(a)samba.org> Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala(a)freescale.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh(a)kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev(a)lists.ozlabs.org Ref: 9bad068c24d7 ("[PATCH] ppc32: support for e500 and 85xx") Ref: 0ed70f6105ef ("PPC32: Provide proper siginfo information on various exceptions.") History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h @@ -18,4 +18,19 @@ #undef NSIGTRAP #define NSIGTRAP 4 +/* + * SIGFPE si_codes + */ +#ifdef __KERNEL__ +#define FPE_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */ +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ + +/* + * SIGTRAP si_codes + */ +#ifdef __KERNEL__ +#define TRAP_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */ +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ + + #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_SIGINFO_H */ --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ void unknown_exception(struct pt_regs *r printk("Bad trap at PC: %lx, SR: %lx, vector=%lx\n", regs->nip, regs->msr, regs->trap); - _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, 0, 0); + _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_FIXME, 0); exception_exit(prev_state); } @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ bail: void RunModeException(struct pt_regs *regs) { - _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, 0, 0); + _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_FIXME, 0); } void single_step_exception(struct pt_regs *regs) @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static void emulate_single_step(struct p static inline int __parse_fpscr(unsigned long fpscr) { - int ret = 0; + int ret = FPE_FIXME; /* Invalid operation */ if ((fpscr & FPSCR_VE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_VX)) @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointException(struct pt extern int do_spe_mathemu(struct pt_regs *regs); unsigned long spefscr; int fpexc_mode; - int code = 0; + int code = FPE_FIXME; int err; flush_spe_to_thread(current); @@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointRoundException(stru printk(KERN_ERR "unrecognized spe instruction " "in %s at %lx\n", current->comm, regs->nip); } else { - _exception(SIGFPE, regs, 0, regs->nip); + _exception(SIGFPE, regs, FPE_FIXME, regs->nip); return; } } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiederm(a)xmission.com are queue-4.15/signal-metag-document-a-conflict-with-si_user-with-sigfpe.patch queue-4.15/signal-arm-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe.patch queue-4.15/signal-powerpc-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe-and-sigtrap.patch

7 years, 6 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v3] i2c: i801: blacklist Host Notify on HP EliteBook G3 850

by Jason Andryuk

The HP EliteBook G3 850 has a weird bug where a subsequent cold boot hangs while plugged in if Linux enables the Host Notify features of i2c-i801. The cold boot hang depends on how the system boots. It does not hang on UEFI Grub text boot or legacy Grub text boot. But it does hang on legacy Grub graphical boot and Intel Boot Agent PXE text boot. Booting unplugged is not affected. Disabling the Host Notify feature with disable_feature=0x20 works around the bug, so automatically do so based on DMI information. More information can be found here: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg33938.html Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk(a)gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare(a)suse.de> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org --- v3: Switch to DMI_EXACT_MATCH and add empty element to array drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c index 692b34125866..11149ddae745 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c @@ -1042,6 +1042,27 @@ static const struct pci_device_id i801_ids[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, i801_ids); #if defined CONFIG_X86 && defined CONFIG_DMI +static const struct dmi_system_id host_notify_dmi_blacklist[] = { + { + .ident = "HP EliteBook G3 850", + .matches = { + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "HP"), + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, + "HP EliteBook 850 G3"), + }, + }, + {} +}; + +static void blacklist_features(struct i801_priv *priv) +{ + if (dmi_check_system(host_notify_dmi_blacklist)) { + dev_warn(&priv->pci_dev->dev, + "SMBus Host Notify disabled on this system"); + priv->features &= ~FEATURE_HOST_NOTIFY; + } +} + static unsigned char apanel_addr; /* Scan the system ROM for the signature "FJKEYINF" */ @@ -1159,6 +1180,7 @@ static void i801_probe_optional_slaves(struct i801_priv *priv) #else static void __init input_apanel_init(void) {} static void i801_probe_optional_slaves(struct i801_priv *priv) {} +static void blacklist_features(struct i801_priv *priv) {} #endif /* CONFIG_X86 && CONFIG_DMI */ #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI @@ -1562,6 +1584,7 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) i801_feature_names[i]); } priv->features &= ~disable_features; + blacklist_features(priv); err = pcim_enable_device(dev); if (err) { -- 2.14.3

7 years, 6 months

5
4
0 0

Patch "sparc64: Oracle DAX driver depends on SPARC64" has been added to the 4.16-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled sparc64: Oracle DAX driver depends on SPARC64 to the 4.16-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: sparc64-oracle-dax-driver-depends-on-sparc64.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.16 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 9c548bb5823dfcf7a16c6e65976d84d9581208c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:21:18 -0800 Subject: sparc64: Oracle DAX driver depends on SPARC64 From: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> commit 9c548bb5823dfcf7a16c6e65976d84d9581208c9 upstream. sparc:allmodconfig fails to build as follows. ERROR: "mdesc_release" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "sun4v_hvapi_register" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "mdesc_get_property" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "mdesc_node_by_name" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "mdesc_grab" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "sun4v_ccb_info" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "sun4v_ccb_submit" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! ERROR: "sun4v_ccb_kill" [drivers/sbus/char/oradax.ko] undefined! The symbols are only available with SPARC64 builds, thus the driver depends on it. Fixes: dd0273284c74 ("sparc64: Oracle DAX driver") Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/sbus/char/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/sbus/char/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/sbus/char/Kconfig @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ config DISPLAY7SEG config ORACLE_DAX tristate "Oracle Data Analytics Accelerator" - default m if SPARC64 + depends on SPARC64 + default m help Driver for Oracle Data Analytics Accelerator, which is a coprocessor that performs database operations in hardware. Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from linux(a)roeck-us.net are queue-4.16/sparc64-oracle-dax-driver-depends-on-sparc64.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Please apply commit 9c548bb5823d to linux-4.16.y

by Guenter Roeck

Hi Greg, please apply 9c548bb5823d sparc64: Oracle DAX driver depends on SPARC64 to linux-4.16.y to fix sparc:allmodconfig builds. Thanks, Guenter

7 years, 6 months

2
1
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From a5321aec6412b20b5ad15db2d6b916c05349dbff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:46 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit a5321aec6412b20b5ad15db2d6b916c05349dbff upstream. Original idea by Ashok, completely rewritten by Borislav. Before you read any further: the early loading method is still the preferred one and you should always do that. The following patch is improving the late loading mechanism for long running jobs and cloud use cases. Gather all cores and serialize the microcode update on them by doing it one-by-one to make the late update process as reliable as possible and avoid potential issues caused by the microcode update. [ Borislav: Rewrite completely. ] Co-developed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-8-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -22,13 +22,16 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) "microcode: " fmt #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h> #include <linux/miscdevice.h> #include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/firmware.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> +#include <linux/nmi.h> #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/mm.h> @@ -64,6 +67,11 @@ LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache); */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex); +/* + * Serialize late loading so that CPUs get updated one-by-one. + */ +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(update_lock); + struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS]; struct cpu_info_ctx { @@ -486,6 +494,19 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(vo /* fake device for request_firmware */ static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; +/* + * Late loading dance. Why the heavy-handed stomp_machine effort? + * + * - HT siblings must be idle and not execute other code while the other sibling + * is loading microcode in order to avoid any negative interactions caused by + * the loading. + * + * - In addition, microcode update on the cores must be serialized until this + * requirement can be relaxed in the future. Right now, this is conservative + * and good. + */ +#define SPINUNIT 100 /* 100 nsec */ + static int check_online_cpus(void) { if (num_online_cpus() == num_present_cpus()) @@ -496,23 +517,85 @@ static int check_online_cpus(void) return -EINVAL; } -static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) +static atomic_t late_cpus; + +/* + * Returns: + * < 0 - on error + * 0 - no update done + * 1 - microcode was updated + */ +static int __reload_late(void *info) { - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; + unsigned int timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC; + int all_cpus = num_online_cpus(); + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + enum ucode_state err; + int ret = 0; + + atomic_dec(&late_cpus); + + /* + * Wait for all CPUs to arrive. A load will not be attempted unless all + * CPUs show up. + * */ + while (atomic_read(&late_cpus)) { + if (timeout < SPINUNIT) { + pr_err("Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: %d\n", + atomic_read(&late_cpus)); + return -1; + } + + ndelay(SPINUNIT); + timeout -= SPINUNIT; + + touch_nmi_watchdog(); + } + + spin_lock(&update_lock); + apply_microcode_local(&err); + spin_unlock(&update_lock); + + if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) { + pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); + ret = -1; + } else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED) { + ret = 1; + } - if (!uci->valid) - return UCODE_OK; + atomic_inc(&late_cpus); - return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); + while (atomic_read(&late_cpus) != all_cpus) + cpu_relax(); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Reload microcode late on all CPUs. Wait for a sec until they + * all gather together. + */ +static int microcode_reload_late(void) +{ + int ret; + + atomic_set(&late_cpus, num_online_cpus()); + + ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + else if (ret > 0) + microcode_check(); + + return ret; } static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { - int cpu, bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; - bool do_callback = false; + int bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; unsigned long val; ssize_t ret = 0; @@ -534,30 +617,13 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic goto put; mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex); - - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu); - if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) { - pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - - /* set retval for the first encountered reload error */ - if (!ret) - ret = -EINVAL; - } - - if (tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) - do_callback = true; - } - - if (!ret && do_callback) - microcode_check(); - + ret = microcode_reload_late(); mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex); put: put_online_cpus(); - if (!ret) + if (ret >= 0) ret = size; return ret; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From cfb52a5a09c8ae3a1dafb44ce549fde5b69e8117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:45 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit cfb52a5a09c8ae3a1dafb44ce549fde5b69e8117 upstream. ... so that any newer version can land in the cache and can later be fished out by the application functions. Do that before grabbing the hotplug lock. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-7-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -499,15 +499,10 @@ static int check_online_cpus(void) static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; - enum ucode_state ustate; if (!uci->valid) return UCODE_OK; - ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); - if (ustate != UCODE_OK) - return ustate; - return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); } @@ -515,11 +510,11 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { + int cpu, bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; bool do_callback = false; unsigned long val; ssize_t ret = 0; - int cpu; ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) @@ -528,6 +523,10 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic if (val != 1) return size; + tmp_ret = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(bsp, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); + if (tmp_ret != UCODE_OK) + return size; + get_online_cpus(); ret = check_online_cpus(); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:26:38 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 upstream. ... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act accordingly. Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto(a)kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe(a)redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 9 +++++++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 10 +++++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------------- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 10 +++++----- 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h @@ -37,7 +37,12 @@ struct cpu_signature { struct device; -enum ucode_state { UCODE_ERROR, UCODE_OK, UCODE_NFOUND }; +enum ucode_state { + UCODE_OK = 0, + UCODE_UPDATED, + UCODE_NFOUND, + UCODE_ERROR, +}; struct microcode_ops { enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_user) (int cpu, @@ -54,7 +59,7 @@ struct microcode_ops { * are being called. * See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. */ - int (*apply_microcode) (int cpu); + enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode) (int cpu); int (*collect_cpu_info) (int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig); }; --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static unsigned int verify_patch_size(u8 return patch_size; } -static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); struct microcode_amd *mc_amd; @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) p = find_patch(cpu); if (!p) - return 0; + return UCODE_NFOUND; mc_amd = p->data; uci->mc = p->data; @@ -523,13 +523,13 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) { c->microcode = rev; uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; - return 0; + return UCODE_OK; } if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) { pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; - return 0; + return UCODE_UPDATED; } static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu) } struct apply_microcode_ctx { - int err; + enum ucode_state err; }; static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg) @@ -489,31 +489,29 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(vo /* fake device for request_firmware */ static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; -static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; enum ucode_state ustate; - int err = 0; if (!uci->valid) - return err; + return UCODE_OK; ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); - if (ustate == UCODE_OK) - apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); - else - if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR) - err = -EINVAL; - return err; + if (ustate != UCODE_OK) + return ustate; + + return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); } static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { + enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; unsigned long val; + ssize_t ret = 0; int cpu; - ssize_t ret = 0, tmp_ret; ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) @@ -526,15 +524,18 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu); - if (tmp_ret != 0) + if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) { pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - /* save retval of the first encountered reload error */ - if (!ret) - ret = tmp_ret; + /* set retval for the first encountered reload error */ + if (!ret) + ret = -EINVAL; + } } - if (!ret) + + if (!ret && tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) perf_check_microcode(); + mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex); put_online_cpus(); --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, return 0; } -static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { struct microcode_intel *mc; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu /* We should bind the task to the CPU */ if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; mc = uci->mc; @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ mc = find_patch(uci); if (!mc) - return 0; + return UCODE_NFOUND; } /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu if (rev != mc->hdr.rev) { pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n", cpu, mc->hdr.rev); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } if (rev != prev_rev) { @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; - return 0; + return UCODE_UPDATED; } static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 91df9fdf51492aec9fed6b4cbd33160886740f47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:42 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit 91df9fdf51492aec9fed6b4cbd33160886740f47 upstream. Updating microcode is less error prone when caches have been flushed and depending on what exactly the microcode is updating. For example, some of the issues around certain Broadwell parts can be addressed by doing a full cache flush. [ Borislav: Massage it and use native_wbinvd() in both cases. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-3-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-4-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -600,6 +600,12 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct return UCODE_OK; } + /* + * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid + * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating. + */ + native_wbinvd(); + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -816,6 +822,12 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ return UCODE_OK; } + /* + * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid + * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating. + */ + native_wbinvd(); + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From d8c3b52c00a05036e0a6b315b4b17921a7b67997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:44 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit d8c3b52c00a05036e0a6b315b4b17921a7b67997 upstream. The cache might contain a newer patch - look in there first. A follow-on change will make sure newest patches are loaded into the cache of microcode patches. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-6-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -791,9 +791,9 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { - struct microcode_intel *mc; - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); + struct microcode_intel *mc; static int prev_rev; u32 rev; @@ -801,11 +801,10 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) return UCODE_ERROR; - uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; - mc = uci->mc; + /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ + mc = find_patch(uci); if (!mc) { - /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ - mc = find_patch(uci); + mc = uci->mc; if (!mc) return UCODE_NFOUND; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:41 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed upstream. After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads. Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly expensive operation. [ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -589,6 +589,17 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct if (!mc) return 0; + /* + * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive + * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode + * already. + */ + rev = intel_get_microcode_revision(); + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) { + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + return UCODE_OK; + } + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -776,7 +787,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ { struct microcode_intel *mc; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c; + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); static int prev_rev; u32 rev; @@ -793,6 +804,18 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ return UCODE_NFOUND; } + /* + * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive + * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode + * already. + */ + rev = intel_get_microcode_revision(); + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) { + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + c->microcode = rev; + return UCODE_OK; + } + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -813,8 +836,6 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ prev_rev = rev; } - c = &cpu_data(cpu); - uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:40 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b upstream. It is a useless remnant from earlier times. Use the ucode_state enum directly. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -373,26 +373,23 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu) return ret; } -struct apply_microcode_ctx { - enum ucode_state err; -}; - static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg) { - struct apply_microcode_ctx *ctx = arg; + enum ucode_state *err = arg; - ctx->err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id()); + *err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id()); } static int apply_microcode_on_target(int cpu) { - struct apply_microcode_ctx ctx = { .err = 0 }; + enum ucode_state err; int ret; - ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &ctx, 1); - if (!ret) - ret = ctx.err; - + ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &err, 1); + if (!ret) { + if (err == UCODE_ERROR) + ret = 1; + } return ret; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From bb8c13d61a629276a162c1d2b1a20a815cbcfbb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:36:15 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit bb8c13d61a629276a162c1d2b1a20a815cbcfbb7 upstream. Emanuel reported an issue with a hang during microcode update because my dumb idea to use one atomic synchronization variable for both rendezvous - before and after update - was simply bollocks: microcode: microcode_reload_late: late_cpus: 4 microcode: __reload_late: cpu 2 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 3 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 0 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 left microcode: Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: 1 CPU1 above would finish, leave and the others will still spin waiting for it to join. So do two synchronization atomics instead, which makes the code a lot more straightforward. Also, since the update is serialized and it also takes quite some time per microcode engine, increase the exit timeout by the number of CPUs on the system. That's ok because the moment all CPUs are done, that timeout will be cut short. Furthermore, panic when some of the CPUs timeout when returning from a microcode update: we can't allow a system with not all cores updated. Also, as an optimization, do not do the exit sync if microcode wasn't updated. Reported-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx(a)protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx(a)protonmail.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -517,7 +517,29 @@ static int check_online_cpus(void) return -EINVAL; } -static atomic_t late_cpus; +static atomic_t late_cpus_in; +static atomic_t late_cpus_out; + +static int __wait_for_cpus(atomic_t *t, long long timeout) +{ + int all_cpus = num_online_cpus(); + + atomic_inc(t); + + while (atomic_read(t) < all_cpus) { + if (timeout < SPINUNIT) { + pr_err("Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: %d\n", + all_cpus - atomic_read(t)); + return 1; + } + + ndelay(SPINUNIT); + timeout -= SPINUNIT; + + touch_nmi_watchdog(); + } + return 0; +} /* * Returns: @@ -527,30 +549,16 @@ static atomic_t late_cpus; */ static int __reload_late(void *info) { - unsigned int timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC; - int all_cpus = num_online_cpus(); int cpu = smp_processor_id(); enum ucode_state err; int ret = 0; - atomic_dec(&late_cpus); - /* * Wait for all CPUs to arrive. A load will not be attempted unless all * CPUs show up. * */ - while (atomic_read(&late_cpus)) { - if (timeout < SPINUNIT) { - pr_err("Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: %d\n", - atomic_read(&late_cpus)); - return -1; - } - - ndelay(SPINUNIT); - timeout -= SPINUNIT; - - touch_nmi_watchdog(); - } + if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_in, NSEC_PER_SEC)) + return -1; spin_lock(&update_lock); apply_microcode_local(&err); @@ -558,15 +566,22 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info) if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) { pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - ret = -1; - } else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED) { + return -1; + /* siblings return UCODE_OK because their engine got updated already */ + } else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED || err == UCODE_OK) { ret = 1; + } else { + return ret; } - atomic_inc(&late_cpus); - - while (atomic_read(&late_cpus) != all_cpus) - cpu_relax(); + /* + * Increase the wait timeout to a safe value here since we're + * serializing the microcode update and that could take a while on a + * large number of CPUs. And that is fine as the *actual* timeout will + * be determined by the last CPU finished updating and thus cut short. + */ + if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_out, NSEC_PER_SEC * num_online_cpus())) + panic("Timeout during microcode update!\n"); return ret; } @@ -579,12 +594,11 @@ static int microcode_reload_late(void) { int ret; - atomic_set(&late_cpus, num_online_cpus()); + atomic_set(&late_cpus_in, 0); + atomic_set(&late_cpus_out, 0); ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - else if (ret > 0) + if (ret > 0) microcode_check(); return ret; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offline" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offline to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 30ec26da9967d0d785abc24073129a34c3211777 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:43 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offline From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit 30ec26da9967d0d785abc24073129a34c3211777 upstream. Avoid loading microcode if any of the CPUs are offline, and issue a warning. Having different microcode revisions on the system at any time is outright dangerous. [ Borislav: Massage changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-4-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-5-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -486,6 +486,16 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(vo /* fake device for request_firmware */ static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; +static int check_online_cpus(void) +{ + if (num_online_cpus() == num_present_cpus()) + return 0; + + pr_err("Not all CPUs online, aborting microcode update.\n"); + + return -EINVAL; +} + static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; @@ -519,7 +529,13 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic return size; get_online_cpus(); + + ret = check_online_cpus(); + if (ret) + goto put; + mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex); + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu); if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) { @@ -538,6 +554,8 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic microcode_check(); mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex); + +put: put_online_cpus(); if (!ret) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 2613f36ed965d0e5a595a1d931fd3b480e82d6fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:36:14 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 2613f36ed965d0e5a595a1d931fd3b480e82d6fd upstream. Return UCODE_NEW from the scanning functions to denote that new microcode was found and only then attempt the expensive synchronization dance. Reported-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx(a)protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx(a)protonmail.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 8 +++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 4 +++- 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct device; enum ucode_state { UCODE_OK = 0, + UCODE_NEW, UCODE_UPDATED, UCODE_NFOUND, UCODE_ERROR, --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd( return -EINVAL; ret = load_microcode_amd(true, x86_family(cpuid_1_eax), desc.data, desc.size); - if (ret != UCODE_OK) + if (ret > UCODE_UPDATED) return -EINVAL; return 0; @@ -683,27 +683,35 @@ static enum ucode_state __load_microcode static enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(bool save, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size) { + struct ucode_patch *p; enum ucode_state ret; /* free old equiv table */ free_equiv_cpu_table(); ret = __load_microcode_amd(family, data, size); - - if (ret != UCODE_OK) + if (ret != UCODE_OK) { cleanup(); + return ret; + } -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 - /* save BSP's matching patch for early load */ - if (save) { - struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(0); - if (p) { - memset(amd_ucode_patch, 0, PATCH_MAX_SIZE); - memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, ksize(p->data), - PATCH_MAX_SIZE)); - } + p = find_patch(0); + if (!p) { + return ret; + } else { + if (boot_cpu_data.microcode == p->patch_id) + return ret; + + ret = UCODE_NEW; } -#endif + + /* save BSP's matching patch for early load */ + if (!save) + return ret; + + memset(amd_ucode_patch, 0, PATCH_MAX_SIZE); + memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, ksize(p->data), PATCH_MAX_SIZE)); + return ret; } --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic return size; tmp_ret = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(bsp, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); - if (tmp_ret != UCODE_OK) + if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW) return size; get_online_cpus(); @@ -691,10 +691,8 @@ static enum ucode_state microcode_init_c if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING) return UCODE_NFOUND; - ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev, - refresh_fw); - - if (ustate == UCODE_OK) { + ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev, refresh_fw); + if (ustate == UCODE_NEW) { pr_debug("CPU%d updated upon init\n", cpu); apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); } --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_mic unsigned int leftover = size; unsigned int curr_mc_size = 0, new_mc_size = 0; unsigned int csig, cpf; + enum ucode_state ret = UCODE_OK; while (leftover) { struct microcode_header_intel mc_header; @@ -903,6 +904,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_mic new_mc = mc; new_mc_size = mc_size; mc = NULL; /* trigger new vmalloc */ + ret = UCODE_NEW; } ucode_ptr += mc_size; @@ -932,7 +934,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_mic pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n", cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev); - return UCODE_OK; + return ret; } static int get_ucode_fw(void *to, const void *from, size_t n) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/CPU: Check CPU feature bits after microcode upgrade" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/CPU: Check CPU feature bits after microcode upgrade to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 42ca8082e260dcfd8afa2afa6ec1940b9d41724c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:26:40 +0100 Subject: x86/CPU: Check CPU feature bits after microcode upgrade From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 42ca8082e260dcfd8afa2afa6ec1940b9d41724c upstream. With some microcode upgrades, new CPUID features can become visible on the CPU. Check what the kernel has mirrored now and issue a warning hinting at possible things the user/admin can do to make use of the newly visible features. Originally-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto(a)kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe(a)redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-4-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1757,5 +1757,25 @@ core_initcall(init_cpu_syscore); */ void microcode_check(void) { + struct cpuinfo_x86 info; + perf_check_microcode(); + + /* Reload CPUID max function as it might've changed. */ + info.cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0); + + /* + * Copy all capability leafs to pick up the synthetic ones so that + * memcmp() below doesn't fail on that. The ones coming from CPUID will + * get overwritten in get_cpu_cap(). + */ + memcpy(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability)); + + get_cpu_cap(&info); + + if (!memcmp(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability))) + return; + + pr_warn("x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.\n"); + pr_warn("x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n"); } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/CPU: Add a microcode loader callback" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/CPU: Add a microcode loader callback to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 1008c52c09dcb23d93f8e0ea83a6246265d2cce0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:26:39 +0100 Subject: x86/CPU: Add a microcode loader callback From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 1008c52c09dcb23d93f8e0ea83a6246265d2cce0 upstream. Add a callback function which the microcode loader calls when microcode has been updated to a newer revision. Do the callback only when no error was encountered during loading. Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto(a)kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe(a)redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-3-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 10 ++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 8 ++++++-- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -969,4 +969,5 @@ bool xen_set_default_idle(void); void stop_this_cpu(void *dummy); void df_debug(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code); +void microcode_check(void); #endif /* _ASM_X86_PROCESSOR_H */ --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1749,3 +1749,13 @@ static int __init init_cpu_syscore(void) return 0; } core_initcall(init_cpu_syscore); + +/* + * The microcode loader calls this upon late microcode load to recheck features, + * only when microcode has been updated. Caller holds microcode_mutex and CPU + * hotplug lock. + */ +void microcode_check(void) +{ + perf_check_microcode(); +} --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic const char *buf, size_t size) { enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; + bool do_callback = false; unsigned long val; ssize_t ret = 0; int cpu; @@ -531,10 +532,13 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic if (!ret) ret = -EINVAL; } + + if (tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) + do_callback = true; } - if (!ret && tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) - perf_check_microcode(); + if (!ret && do_callback) + microcode_check(); mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex); put_online_cpus(); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.15/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.15/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.15/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From a5321aec6412b20b5ad15db2d6b916c05349dbff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:46 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit a5321aec6412b20b5ad15db2d6b916c05349dbff upstream. Original idea by Ashok, completely rewritten by Borislav. Before you read any further: the early loading method is still the preferred one and you should always do that. The following patch is improving the late loading mechanism for long running jobs and cloud use cases. Gather all cores and serialize the microcode update on them by doing it one-by-one to make the late update process as reliable as possible and avoid potential issues caused by the microcode update. [ Borislav: Rewrite completely. ] Co-developed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-8-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -22,13 +22,16 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) "microcode: " fmt #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h> #include <linux/miscdevice.h> #include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/firmware.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> +#include <linux/nmi.h> #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/mm.h> @@ -64,6 +67,11 @@ LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache); */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex); +/* + * Serialize late loading so that CPUs get updated one-by-one. + */ +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(update_lock); + struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS]; struct cpu_info_ctx { @@ -486,6 +494,19 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(vo /* fake device for request_firmware */ static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; +/* + * Late loading dance. Why the heavy-handed stomp_machine effort? + * + * - HT siblings must be idle and not execute other code while the other sibling + * is loading microcode in order to avoid any negative interactions caused by + * the loading. + * + * - In addition, microcode update on the cores must be serialized until this + * requirement can be relaxed in the future. Right now, this is conservative + * and good. + */ +#define SPINUNIT 100 /* 100 nsec */ + static int check_online_cpus(void) { if (num_online_cpus() == num_present_cpus()) @@ -496,23 +517,85 @@ static int check_online_cpus(void) return -EINVAL; } -static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) +static atomic_t late_cpus; + +/* + * Returns: + * < 0 - on error + * 0 - no update done + * 1 - microcode was updated + */ +static int __reload_late(void *info) { - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; + unsigned int timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC; + int all_cpus = num_online_cpus(); + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + enum ucode_state err; + int ret = 0; + + atomic_dec(&late_cpus); + + /* + * Wait for all CPUs to arrive. A load will not be attempted unless all + * CPUs show up. + * */ + while (atomic_read(&late_cpus)) { + if (timeout < SPINUNIT) { + pr_err("Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: %d\n", + atomic_read(&late_cpus)); + return -1; + } + + ndelay(SPINUNIT); + timeout -= SPINUNIT; + + touch_nmi_watchdog(); + } + + spin_lock(&update_lock); + apply_microcode_local(&err); + spin_unlock(&update_lock); + + if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) { + pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); + ret = -1; + } else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED) { + ret = 1; + } - if (!uci->valid) - return UCODE_OK; + atomic_inc(&late_cpus); - return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); + while (atomic_read(&late_cpus) != all_cpus) + cpu_relax(); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Reload microcode late on all CPUs. Wait for a sec until they + * all gather together. + */ +static int microcode_reload_late(void) +{ + int ret; + + atomic_set(&late_cpus, num_online_cpus()); + + ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + else if (ret > 0) + microcode_check(); + + return ret; } static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { - int cpu, bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; - bool do_callback = false; + int bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; unsigned long val; ssize_t ret = 0; @@ -534,30 +617,13 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic goto put; mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex); - - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu); - if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) { - pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - - /* set retval for the first encountered reload error */ - if (!ret) - ret = -EINVAL; - } - - if (tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) - do_callback = true; - } - - if (!ret && do_callback) - microcode_check(); - + ret = microcode_reload_late(); mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex); put: put_online_cpus(); - if (!ret) + if (ret >= 0) ret = size; return ret; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From cfb52a5a09c8ae3a1dafb44ce549fde5b69e8117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:45 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit cfb52a5a09c8ae3a1dafb44ce549fde5b69e8117 upstream. ... so that any newer version can land in the cache and can later be fished out by the application functions. Do that before grabbing the hotplug lock. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-7-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -499,15 +499,10 @@ static int check_online_cpus(void) static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; - enum ucode_state ustate; if (!uci->valid) return UCODE_OK; - ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); - if (ustate != UCODE_OK) - return ustate; - return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); } @@ -515,11 +510,11 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { + int cpu, bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; bool do_callback = false; unsigned long val; ssize_t ret = 0; - int cpu; ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) @@ -528,6 +523,10 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic if (val != 1) return size; + tmp_ret = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(bsp, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); + if (tmp_ret != UCODE_OK) + return size; + get_online_cpus(); ret = check_online_cpus(); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:26:38 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 upstream. ... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act accordingly. Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto(a)kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe(a)redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 9 +++++++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 10 +++++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------------- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 10 +++++----- 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h @@ -37,7 +37,12 @@ struct cpu_signature { struct device; -enum ucode_state { UCODE_ERROR, UCODE_OK, UCODE_NFOUND }; +enum ucode_state { + UCODE_OK = 0, + UCODE_UPDATED, + UCODE_NFOUND, + UCODE_ERROR, +}; struct microcode_ops { enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_user) (int cpu, @@ -54,7 +59,7 @@ struct microcode_ops { * are being called. * See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. */ - int (*apply_microcode) (int cpu); + enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode) (int cpu); int (*collect_cpu_info) (int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig); }; --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static unsigned int verify_patch_size(u8 return patch_size; } -static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); struct microcode_amd *mc_amd; @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) p = find_patch(cpu); if (!p) - return 0; + return UCODE_NFOUND; mc_amd = p->data; uci->mc = p->data; @@ -523,13 +523,13 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) { c->microcode = rev; uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; - return 0; + return UCODE_OK; } if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) { pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; - return 0; + return UCODE_UPDATED; } static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu) } struct apply_microcode_ctx { - int err; + enum ucode_state err; }; static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg) @@ -489,31 +489,29 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(vo /* fake device for request_firmware */ static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; -static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; enum ucode_state ustate; - int err = 0; if (!uci->valid) - return err; + return UCODE_OK; ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev, true); - if (ustate == UCODE_OK) - apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); - else - if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR) - err = -EINVAL; - return err; + if (ustate != UCODE_OK) + return ustate; + + return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); } static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { + enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; unsigned long val; + ssize_t ret = 0; int cpu; - ssize_t ret = 0, tmp_ret; ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) @@ -526,15 +524,18 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu); - if (tmp_ret != 0) + if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) { pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - /* save retval of the first encountered reload error */ - if (!ret) - ret = tmp_ret; + /* set retval for the first encountered reload error */ + if (!ret) + ret = -EINVAL; + } } - if (!ret) + + if (!ret && tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) perf_check_microcode(); + mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex); put_online_cpus(); --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, return 0; } -static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { struct microcode_intel *mc; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu /* We should bind the task to the CPU */ if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; mc = uci->mc; @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ mc = find_patch(uci); if (!mc) - return 0; + return UCODE_NFOUND; } /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu if (rev != mc->hdr.rev) { pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n", cpu, mc->hdr.rev); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } if (rev != prev_rev) { @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; - return 0; + return UCODE_UPDATED; } static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 91df9fdf51492aec9fed6b4cbd33160886740f47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:42 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit 91df9fdf51492aec9fed6b4cbd33160886740f47 upstream. Updating microcode is less error prone when caches have been flushed and depending on what exactly the microcode is updating. For example, some of the issues around certain Broadwell parts can be addressed by doing a full cache flush. [ Borislav: Massage it and use native_wbinvd() in both cases. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-3-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-4-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -600,6 +600,12 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct return UCODE_OK; } + /* + * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid + * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating. + */ + native_wbinvd(); + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -816,6 +822,12 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ return UCODE_OK; } + /* + * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid + * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating. + */ + native_wbinvd(); + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:41 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> commit c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed upstream. After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads. Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly expensive operation. [ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.… Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -589,6 +589,17 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct if (!mc) return 0; + /* + * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive + * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode + * already. + */ + rev = intel_get_microcode_revision(); + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) { + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + return UCODE_OK; + } + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -776,7 +787,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ { struct microcode_intel *mc; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c; + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); static int prev_rev; u32 rev; @@ -793,6 +804,18 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ return UCODE_NFOUND; } + /* + * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive + * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode + * already. + */ + rev = intel_get_microcode_revision(); + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) { + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + c->microcode = rev; + return UCODE_OK; + } + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -813,8 +836,6 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ prev_rev = rev; } - c = &cpu_data(cpu); - uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj(a)intel.com are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From d8c3b52c00a05036e0a6b315b4b17921a7b67997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:44 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit d8c3b52c00a05036e0a6b315b4b17921a7b67997 upstream. The cache might contain a newer patch - look in there first. A follow-on change will make sure newest patches are loaded into the cache of microcode patches. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-6-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -791,9 +791,9 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { - struct microcode_intel *mc; - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); + struct microcode_intel *mc; static int prev_rev; u32 rev; @@ -801,11 +801,10 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_ if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) return UCODE_ERROR; - uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; - mc = uci->mc; + /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ + mc = find_patch(uci); if (!mc) { - /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ - mc = find_patch(uci); + mc = uci->mc; if (!mc) return UCODE_NFOUND; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:40 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit 854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b upstream. It is a useless remnant from earlier times. Use the ucode_state enum directly. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven(a)intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -373,26 +373,23 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu) return ret; } -struct apply_microcode_ctx { - enum ucode_state err; -}; - static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg) { - struct apply_microcode_ctx *ctx = arg; + enum ucode_state *err = arg; - ctx->err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id()); + *err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id()); } static int apply_microcode_on_target(int cpu) { - struct apply_microcode_ctx ctx = { .err = 0 }; + enum ucode_state err; int ret; - ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &ctx, 1); - if (!ret) - ret = ctx.err; - + ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &err, 1); + if (!ret) { + if (err == UCODE_ERROR) + ret = 1; + } return ret; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From bb8c13d61a629276a162c1d2b1a20a815cbcfbb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:36:15 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine From: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> commit bb8c13d61a629276a162c1d2b1a20a815cbcfbb7 upstream. Emanuel reported an issue with a hang during microcode update because my dumb idea to use one atomic synchronization variable for both rendezvous - before and after update - was simply bollocks: microcode: microcode_reload_late: late_cpus: 4 microcode: __reload_late: cpu 2 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 3 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 0 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 left microcode: Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: 1 CPU1 above would finish, leave and the others will still spin waiting for it to join. So do two synchronization atomics instead, which makes the code a lot more straightforward. Also, since the update is serialized and it also takes quite some time per microcode engine, increase the exit timeout by the number of CPUs on the system. That's ok because the moment all CPUs are done, that timeout will be cut short. Furthermore, panic when some of the CPUs timeout when returning from a microcode update: we can't allow a system with not all cores updated. Also, as an optimization, do not do the exit sync if microcode wasn't updated. Reported-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx(a)protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Tested-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx(a)protonmail.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj(a)intel.com> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky(a)amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -517,7 +517,29 @@ static int check_online_cpus(void) return -EINVAL; } -static atomic_t late_cpus; +static atomic_t late_cpus_in; +static atomic_t late_cpus_out; + +static int __wait_for_cpus(atomic_t *t, long long timeout) +{ + int all_cpus = num_online_cpus(); + + atomic_inc(t); + + while (atomic_read(t) < all_cpus) { + if (timeout < SPINUNIT) { + pr_err("Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: %d\n", + all_cpus - atomic_read(t)); + return 1; + } + + ndelay(SPINUNIT); + timeout -= SPINUNIT; + + touch_nmi_watchdog(); + } + return 0; +} /* * Returns: @@ -527,30 +549,16 @@ static atomic_t late_cpus; */ static int __reload_late(void *info) { - unsigned int timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC; - int all_cpus = num_online_cpus(); int cpu = smp_processor_id(); enum ucode_state err; int ret = 0; - atomic_dec(&late_cpus); - /* * Wait for all CPUs to arrive. A load will not be attempted unless all * CPUs show up. * */ - while (atomic_read(&late_cpus)) { - if (timeout < SPINUNIT) { - pr_err("Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: %d\n", - atomic_read(&late_cpus)); - return -1; - } - - ndelay(SPINUNIT); - timeout -= SPINUNIT; - - touch_nmi_watchdog(); - } + if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_in, NSEC_PER_SEC)) + return -1; spin_lock(&update_lock); apply_microcode_local(&err); @@ -558,15 +566,22 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info) if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) { pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - ret = -1; - } else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED) { + return -1; + /* siblings return UCODE_OK because their engine got updated already */ + } else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED || err == UCODE_OK) { ret = 1; + } else { + return ret; } - atomic_inc(&late_cpus); - - while (atomic_read(&late_cpus) != all_cpus) - cpu_relax(); + /* + * Increase the wait timeout to a safe value here since we're + * serializing the microcode update and that could take a while on a + * large number of CPUs. And that is fine as the *actual* timeout will + * be determined by the last CPU finished updating and thus cut short. + */ + if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_out, NSEC_PER_SEC * num_online_cpus())) + panic("Timeout during microcode update!\n"); return ret; } @@ -579,12 +594,11 @@ static int microcode_reload_late(void) { int ret; - atomic_set(&late_cpus, num_online_cpus()); + atomic_set(&late_cpus_in, 0); + atomic_set(&late_cpus_out, 0); ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - else if (ret > 0) + if (ret > 0) microcode_check(); return ret; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp(a)suse.de are queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch queue-4.14/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror