The patch below does not apply to the 4.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From fd10e2ce9905030d922e179a8047a4d50daffd8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:46:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers
When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and
removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this
however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the
old, and still valid, seqno, or it may match the cleared seqno with the
now zero rq->global_seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and
signaling the fence.
Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the execution queue")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin(a)linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen(a)linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin(a)intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206094633.30181-1-chris@…
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index efbc627a2a25..b955f7d7bd0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -588,29 +588,16 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
}
-static bool signal_valid(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
-{
- return intel_wait_check_request(&request->signaling.wait, request);
-}
-
static bool signal_complete(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
{
if (!request)
return false;
- /* If another process served as the bottom-half it may have already
- * signalled that this wait is already completed.
- */
- if (intel_wait_complete(&request->signaling.wait))
- return signal_valid(request);
-
- /* Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
+ /*
+ * Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
* seqno to be visible or if the GPU hung.
*/
- if (__i915_request_irq_complete(request))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return __i915_request_irq_complete(request);
}
static struct drm_i915_gem_request *to_signaler(struct rb_node *rb)
@@ -712,6 +699,7 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(void *arg)
&request->fence.flags)) {
local_bh_disable();
dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
}
The patch below does not apply to the 4.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From e76019a81921e87a4d9e7b3d86102bc708a6c227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak(a)intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:29:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt, glk: Increase PCODE timeouts during CDCLK freq
changing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Currently we see sporadic timeouts during CDCLK changing both on BXT and
GLK as reported by the Bugzilla: ticket. It's easy to reproduce this by
changing the frequency in a tight loop after blanking the display. The
upper bound for the completion time is 800us based on my tests, so
increase it from the current 500us to 2ms; with that I couldn't trigger
the problem either on BXT or GLK.
Note that timeouts happened during both the change notification and the
voltage level setting PCODE request. (For the latter one BSpec doesn't
require us to wait for completion before further HW programming.)
This issue is similar to
commit 2c7d0602c815 ("drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK
change notification")
but there the PCODE request does complete (as shown by the mbox
busy flag), only the reply we get from PCODE indicates a failure.
So there we keep resending the request until a success reply, here we
just have to increase the timeout for the one PCODE request we send.
v2:
- s/snb_pcode_request/sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout/ (Ville)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala(a)linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103326
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak(a)intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180130142939.17983-1-imre.d…
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 21403be6ee0c..8cd4d6f3a160 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3728,7 +3728,11 @@ extern void intel_display_print_error_state(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *e,
struct intel_display_error_state *error);
int sandybridge_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 *val);
-int sandybridge_pcode_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 val);
+int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox,
+ u32 val, int timeout_us);
+#define sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, mbox, val) \
+ sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv, mbox, val, 500)
+
int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 request,
u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index c4392ea34a3d..a423b674fcec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -1370,10 +1370,15 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
break;
}
- /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change */
+ /*
+ * Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. BSpec
+ * requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to timeouts;
+ * the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
+ */
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
- ret = sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
- 0x80000000);
+ ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
+ HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
+ 0x80000000, 2000);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
if (ret) {
@@ -1404,8 +1409,15 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
- ret = sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
- cdclk_state->voltage_level);
+ /*
+ * The timeout isn't specified, the 2ms used here is based on
+ * experiment.
+ * FIXME: Waiting for the request completion could be delayed until
+ * the next PCODE request based on BSpec.
+ */
+ ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
+ HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
+ cdclk_state->voltage_level, 2000);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 6dc4677e6c3f..3cc2e6fdd98a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -9214,8 +9214,8 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 *val
return 0;
}
-int sandybridge_pcode_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- u32 mbox, u32 val)
+int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ u32 mbox, u32 val, int timeout_us)
{
int status;
@@ -9238,7 +9238,7 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (__intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv,
GEN6_PCODE_MAILBOX, GEN6_PCODE_READY, 0,
- 500, 0, NULL)) {
+ timeout_us, 0, NULL)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for pcode write of 0x%08x to mbox %x to finish for %ps\n",
val, mbox, __builtin_return_address(0));
return -ETIMEDOUT;
The patch below does not apply to the 3.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 54a307ba8d3cd00a3902337ffaae28f436eeb1a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:42:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: fix logic of events on child
When event on child inodes are sent to the parent inode mark and
parent inode mark was not marked with FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD, the event
will not be delivered to the listener process. However, if the same
process also has a mount mark, the event to the parent inode will be
delivered regadless of the mount mark mask.
This behavior is incorrect in the case where the mount mark mask does
not contain the specific event type. For example, the process adds
a mark on a directory with mask FAN_MODIFY (without FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD)
and a mount mark with mask FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE (without FAN_ONDIR).
A modify event on a file inside that directory (and inside that mount)
should not create a FAN_MODIFY event, because neither of the marks
requested to get that event on the file.
Fixes: 1968f5eed54c ("fanotify: use both marks when possible")
Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index d51e1bb781cf..d94e8031fe5f 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
u32 event_mask,
const void *data, int data_type)
{
- __u32 marks_mask, marks_ignored_mask;
+ __u32 marks_mask = 0, marks_ignored_mask = 0;
const struct path *path = data;
pr_debug("%s: inode_mark=%p vfsmnt_mark=%p mask=%x data=%p"
@@ -108,24 +108,20 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
!d_can_lookup(path->dentry))
return false;
- if (inode_mark && vfsmnt_mark) {
- marks_mask = (vfsmnt_mark->mask | inode_mark->mask);
- marks_ignored_mask = (vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask | inode_mark->ignored_mask);
- } else if (inode_mark) {
- /*
- * if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about
- * events on the child, don't send it!
- */
- if ((event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) &&
- !(inode_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
- return false;
- marks_mask = inode_mark->mask;
- marks_ignored_mask = inode_mark->ignored_mask;
- } else if (vfsmnt_mark) {
- marks_mask = vfsmnt_mark->mask;
- marks_ignored_mask = vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask;
- } else {
- BUG();
+ /*
+ * if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about
+ * events on the child, don't send it!
+ */
+ if (inode_mark &&
+ (!(event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) ||
+ (inode_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))) {
+ marks_mask |= inode_mark->mask;
+ marks_ignored_mask |= inode_mark->ignored_mask;
+ }
+
+ if (vfsmnt_mark) {
+ marks_mask |= vfsmnt_mark->mask;
+ marks_ignored_mask |= vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask;
}
if (d_is_dir(path->dentry) &&
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 54a307ba8d3cd00a3902337ffaae28f436eeb1a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:42:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: fix logic of events on child
When event on child inodes are sent to the parent inode mark and
parent inode mark was not marked with FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD, the event
will not be delivered to the listener process. However, if the same
process also has a mount mark, the event to the parent inode will be
delivered regadless of the mount mark mask.
This behavior is incorrect in the case where the mount mark mask does
not contain the specific event type. For example, the process adds
a mark on a directory with mask FAN_MODIFY (without FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD)
and a mount mark with mask FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE (without FAN_ONDIR).
A modify event on a file inside that directory (and inside that mount)
should not create a FAN_MODIFY event, because neither of the marks
requested to get that event on the file.
Fixes: 1968f5eed54c ("fanotify: use both marks when possible")
Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index d51e1bb781cf..d94e8031fe5f 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
u32 event_mask,
const void *data, int data_type)
{
- __u32 marks_mask, marks_ignored_mask;
+ __u32 marks_mask = 0, marks_ignored_mask = 0;
const struct path *path = data;
pr_debug("%s: inode_mark=%p vfsmnt_mark=%p mask=%x data=%p"
@@ -108,24 +108,20 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
!d_can_lookup(path->dentry))
return false;
- if (inode_mark && vfsmnt_mark) {
- marks_mask = (vfsmnt_mark->mask | inode_mark->mask);
- marks_ignored_mask = (vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask | inode_mark->ignored_mask);
- } else if (inode_mark) {
- /*
- * if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about
- * events on the child, don't send it!
- */
- if ((event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) &&
- !(inode_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
- return false;
- marks_mask = inode_mark->mask;
- marks_ignored_mask = inode_mark->ignored_mask;
- } else if (vfsmnt_mark) {
- marks_mask = vfsmnt_mark->mask;
- marks_ignored_mask = vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask;
- } else {
- BUG();
+ /*
+ * if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about
+ * events on the child, don't send it!
+ */
+ if (inode_mark &&
+ (!(event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) ||
+ (inode_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))) {
+ marks_mask |= inode_mark->mask;
+ marks_ignored_mask |= inode_mark->ignored_mask;
+ }
+
+ if (vfsmnt_mark) {
+ marks_mask |= vfsmnt_mark->mask;
+ marks_ignored_mask |= vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask;
}
if (d_is_dir(path->dentry) &&
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 54a307ba8d3cd00a3902337ffaae28f436eeb1a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:42:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: fix logic of events on child
When event on child inodes are sent to the parent inode mark and
parent inode mark was not marked with FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD, the event
will not be delivered to the listener process. However, if the same
process also has a mount mark, the event to the parent inode will be
delivered regadless of the mount mark mask.
This behavior is incorrect in the case where the mount mark mask does
not contain the specific event type. For example, the process adds
a mark on a directory with mask FAN_MODIFY (without FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD)
and a mount mark with mask FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE (without FAN_ONDIR).
A modify event on a file inside that directory (and inside that mount)
should not create a FAN_MODIFY event, because neither of the marks
requested to get that event on the file.
Fixes: 1968f5eed54c ("fanotify: use both marks when possible")
Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index d51e1bb781cf..d94e8031fe5f 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
u32 event_mask,
const void *data, int data_type)
{
- __u32 marks_mask, marks_ignored_mask;
+ __u32 marks_mask = 0, marks_ignored_mask = 0;
const struct path *path = data;
pr_debug("%s: inode_mark=%p vfsmnt_mark=%p mask=%x data=%p"
@@ -108,24 +108,20 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
!d_can_lookup(path->dentry))
return false;
- if (inode_mark && vfsmnt_mark) {
- marks_mask = (vfsmnt_mark->mask | inode_mark->mask);
- marks_ignored_mask = (vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask | inode_mark->ignored_mask);
- } else if (inode_mark) {
- /*
- * if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about
- * events on the child, don't send it!
- */
- if ((event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) &&
- !(inode_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
- return false;
- marks_mask = inode_mark->mask;
- marks_ignored_mask = inode_mark->ignored_mask;
- } else if (vfsmnt_mark) {
- marks_mask = vfsmnt_mark->mask;
- marks_ignored_mask = vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask;
- } else {
- BUG();
+ /*
+ * if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about
+ * events on the child, don't send it!
+ */
+ if (inode_mark &&
+ (!(event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) ||
+ (inode_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))) {
+ marks_mask |= inode_mark->mask;
+ marks_ignored_mask |= inode_mark->ignored_mask;
+ }
+
+ if (vfsmnt_mark) {
+ marks_mask |= vfsmnt_mark->mask;
+ marks_ignored_mask |= vfsmnt_mark->ignored_mask;
}
if (d_is_dir(path->dentry) &&
From: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
commit 74dae4278546b897eb81784fdfcce872ddd8b2b8 upstream.
Competing overwrite DIO in dioread_nolock mode will just overwrite
pointer to io_end in the inode. This may result in data corruption or
extent conversion happening from IO completion interrupt because we
don't properly set buffer_defer_completion() when unlocked DIO races
with locked DIO to unwritten extent.
Since unlocked DIO doesn't need io_end for anything, just avoid
allocating it and corrupting pointer from inode for locked DIO.
A cleaner fix would be to avoid these games with io_end pointer from the
inode but that requires more intrusive changes so we leave that for
later.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor(a)gmail.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index f0cabc8c96cb..fa99cae9552b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3256,29 +3256,29 @@ static ssize_t ext4_ext_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
* case, we allocate an io_end structure to hook to the iocb.
*/
iocb->private = NULL;
- ext4_inode_aio_set(inode, NULL);
- if (!is_sync_kiocb(iocb)) {
- io_end = ext4_init_io_end(inode, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!io_end) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto retake_lock;
- }
- /*
- * Grab reference for DIO. Will be dropped in ext4_end_io_dio()
- */
- iocb->private = ext4_get_io_end(io_end);
- /*
- * we save the io structure for current async direct
- * IO, so that later ext4_map_blocks() could flag the
- * io structure whether there is a unwritten extents
- * needs to be converted when IO is completed.
- */
- ext4_inode_aio_set(inode, io_end);
- }
-
if (overwrite) {
get_block_func = ext4_get_block_write_nolock;
} else {
+ ext4_inode_aio_set(inode, NULL);
+ if (!is_sync_kiocb(iocb)) {
+ io_end = ext4_init_io_end(inode, GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!io_end) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto retake_lock;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Grab reference for DIO. Will be dropped in
+ * ext4_end_io_dio()
+ */
+ iocb->private = ext4_get_io_end(io_end);
+ /*
+ * we save the io structure for current async direct
+ * IO, so that later ext4_map_blocks() could flag the
+ * io structure whether there is a unwritten extents
+ * needs to be converted when IO is completed.
+ */
+ ext4_inode_aio_set(inode, io_end);
+ }
get_block_func = ext4_get_block_write;
dio_flags = DIO_LOCKING;
}
--
2.17.0