When doing a modeset where the sink is transitioning from D3 to D0 , it
would sometimes be possible for the initial power_up_phy() to start
timing out. This would only be observed in the last action before the
sink went into D3 mode was intel_dp_sink_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF). We
originally thought this might be an issue with us accidentally shutting
off the aux block when putting the sink into D3, but since the DP spec
mandates that sinks must wake up within 1ms while we have 100ms to
respond to an ESI irq, this didn't really add up. Turns out that the
problem is more subtle then that:
It turns out that the timeout is from us not enabling DPMS on the MST
hub before actually trying to initiate sideband communications. This
would cause the first sideband communication (power_up_phy()), to start
timing out because the sink wasn't ready to respond. Afterwards, we
would call intel_dp_sink_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) in
intel_ddi_pre_enable_dp(), which would actually result in waking up the
sink so that sideband requests would work again.
Since DPMS is what lets us actually bring the hub up into a state where
sideband communications become functional again, we just need to make
sure to enable DPMS on the display before attempting to perform sideband
communications.
Changes since v1:
- Remove comment above if (!intel_dp->is_mst) - vsryjala
- Move intel_dp_sink_dpms() for MST into intel_dp_post_disable_mst() to
keep enable/disable paths symmetrical
- Improve commit message - dhnkrn
Changes since v2:
- Only send DPMS off when we're disabling the last sink, and only send
DPMS on when we're enabling the first sink - dhnkrn
Changes since v3:
- Check against is_mst, not intel_dp->is_mst - dhnkrn/vsyrjala
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan(a)intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala(a)linux.intel.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott(a)redhat.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ad260ab32a4d9 ("drm/i915/dp: Write to SET_POWER dpcd to enable MST hub.")
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index a6672a9abd85..92cb26b18a9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -2324,7 +2324,8 @@ static void intel_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
intel_prepare_dp_ddi_buffers(encoder, crtc_state);
intel_ddi_init_dp_buf_reg(encoder);
- intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
+ if (!is_mst)
+ intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
if (port != PORT_A || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
@@ -2422,12 +2423,15 @@ static void intel_ddi_post_disable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder->base);
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
+ bool is_mst = intel_crtc_has_type(old_crtc_state,
+ INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST);
/*
* Power down sink before disabling the port, otherwise we end
* up getting interrupts from the sink on detecting link loss.
*/
- intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
+ if (!is_mst)
+ intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
intel_disable_ddi_buf(encoder);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
index c3de0918ee13..9e6956c08688 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -180,9 +180,11 @@ static void intel_mst_post_disable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
intel_dp->active_mst_links--;
intel_mst->connector = NULL;
- if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0)
+ if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0) {
+ intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
intel_dig_port->base.post_disable(&intel_dig_port->base,
old_crtc_state, NULL);
+ }
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("active links %d\n", intel_dp->active_mst_links);
}
@@ -223,7 +225,11 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("active links %d\n", intel_dp->active_mst_links);
+ if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0)
+ intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
+
drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, connector->port, true);
+
if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0)
intel_dig_port->base.pre_enable(&intel_dig_port->base,
pipe_config, NULL);
--
2.14.3
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 97.7389)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Build OK!
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 7.2454)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Build OK!
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: 9e0d39d8a6a0 tpm: Remove useless priv field in struct tpm_vendor_specific.
The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 19.6716)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 6.8160)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Build OK!
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 19.9792)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build failed! Errors:
set_memory.h: No such file or directory
v4.4.127: Build failed! Errors:
set_memory.h: No such file or directory
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 22.1404)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Build OK!
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: ecdd09597a57 block/loop: fix race between I/O and set_status.
The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 97.9620)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 8.0623)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Build OK!
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 44.5575)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
62cccb8c8e7a ("mm: simplify lock_page_memcg()")
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha