- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/atmel-hlcdc: check stride values in the first plane" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 9fcf2b3c1c0276650fea537c71b513d27d929b05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Agner <stefan(a)agner.ch> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 10:48:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/atmel-hlcdc: check stride values in the first plane The statement always evaluates to true since the struct fields are arrays. This has shown up as a warning when compiling with clang: warning: address of array 'desc->layout.xstride' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion] Check for values in the first plane instead. Fixes: 1a396789f65a ("drm: add Atmel HLCDC Display Controller support") Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan(a)agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon(a)bootlin.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180617084826.31885-1-stefan… diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c index e18800ed7cd1..7b8191eae68a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_plane_init_properties(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane, drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, props->alpha, 255); - if (desc->layout.xstride && desc->layout.pstride) { + if (desc->layout.xstride[0] && desc->layout.pstride[0]) { int ret; ret = drm_plane_create_rotation_property(&plane->base,

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/atmel-hlcdc: check stride values in the first plane" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 9fcf2b3c1c0276650fea537c71b513d27d929b05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Agner <stefan(a)agner.ch> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 10:48:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/atmel-hlcdc: check stride values in the first plane The statement always evaluates to true since the struct fields are arrays. This has shown up as a warning when compiling with clang: warning: address of array 'desc->layout.xstride' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion] Check for values in the first plane instead. Fixes: 1a396789f65a ("drm: add Atmel HLCDC Display Controller support") Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan(a)agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon(a)bootlin.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180617084826.31885-1-stefan… diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c index e18800ed7cd1..7b8191eae68a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_plane_init_properties(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane, drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, props->alpha, 255); - if (desc->layout.xstride && desc->layout.pstride) { + if (desc->layout.xstride[0] && desc->layout.pstride[0]) { int ret; ret = drm_plane_create_rotation_property(&plane->base,

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amd/pp: initialize result to before or'ing in data" failed to apply to 4.17-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.17-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From c4ff91dd40e2253ab6dd028011469c2c694e1e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 13:18:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/pp: initialize result to before or'ing in data The current use of result is or'ing in values and checking for a non-zero result, however, result is not initialized to zero so it potentially contains garbage to start with. Fix this by initializing it to the first return from the call to vega10_program_didt_config_registers. Detected by cppcheck: "(error) Uninitialized variable: result" Fixes: 9b7b8154cdb8 ("drm/amd/powerplay: added didt support for vega10") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com> Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang(a)amd.com> [Fix the subject as Colin's comment] Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_powertune.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_powertune.c index a9efd8554fbc..dbe4b1f66784 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_powertune.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_powertune.c @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static int vega10_enable_psm_gc_edc_config(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr) for (count = 0; count < num_se; count++) { data = GRBM_GFX_INDEX__INSTANCE_BROADCAST_WRITES_MASK | GRBM_GFX_INDEX__SH_BROADCAST_WRITES_MASK | ( count << GRBM_GFX_INDEX__SE_INDEX__SHIFT); WREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmGRBM_GFX_INDEX, data); - result |= vega10_program_didt_config_registers(hwmgr, PSMSEEDCStallPatternConfig_Vega10, VEGA10_CONFIGREG_DIDT); + result = vega10_program_didt_config_registers(hwmgr, PSMSEEDCStallPatternConfig_Vega10, VEGA10_CONFIGREG_DIDT); result |= vega10_program_didt_config_registers(hwmgr, PSMSEEDCStallDelayConfig_Vega10, VEGA10_CONFIGREG_DIDT); result |= vega10_program_didt_config_registers(hwmgr, PSMSEEDCCtrlResetConfig_Vega10, VEGA10_CONFIGREG_DIDT); result |= vega10_program_didt_config_registers(hwmgr, PSMSEEDCCtrlConfig_Vega10, VEGA10_CONFIGREG_DIDT);

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 368b554d63948133aca05e63ff8f5f4fbc2804d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:01:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available." This reverts commit dc911f5bd8aacfcf8aabd5c26c88e04c837a938e. Per the report, no matter what display mode you select with xrandr, the i915 driver will always select the alternate fixed mode. For the reporter this means that the display will always run at 40Hz which is quite annoying. This may be due to the mode comparison. But there are some other potential issues. The choice of alt_fixed_mode seems dubious. It's the first non-preferred mode, but there are no guarantees that the only difference would be refresh rate. Similarly, there may be more than one preferred mode in the probed modes list, and the commit changes the preferred mode selection to choose the last one on the list instead of the first. (Note that the probed modes list is the raw, unfiltered, unsorted list of modes from drm_add_edid_modes(), not the pretty result after a drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes() call.) Finally, we already have eerily similar code in place to find the downclock mode for DRRS that seems like could be reused here. Back to the drawing board. Note: This is a hand-crafted revert due to conflicts. If it fails to backport, please just try reverting the original commit directly. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105469 Reported-by: Rune Petersen <rune(a)megahurts.dk> Reported-by: Mark Spencer <n7u4722r35(a)ynzlx.anonbox.net> Fixes: dc911f5bd8aa ("drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available.") Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor(a)intel.com> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni(a)intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+ Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan(a)intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180516080110.22770-1-jani.n… (cherry picked from commit d93fa1b47b8fcd149b5091f18385304f402a8e15) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index dde92e4af5d3..8320f0e8e3be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -1679,23 +1679,6 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, return bpp; } -static bool intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(struct drm_display_mode *m1, - struct drm_display_mode *m2) -{ - bool bres = false; - - if (m1 && m2) - bres = (m1->hdisplay == m2->hdisplay && - m1->hsync_start == m2->hsync_start && - m1->hsync_end == m2->hsync_end && - m1->htotal == m2->htotal && - m1->vdisplay == m2->vdisplay && - m1->vsync_start == m2->vsync_start && - m1->vsync_end == m2->vsync_end && - m1->vtotal == m2->vtotal); - return bres; -} - /* Adjust link config limits based on compliance test requests. */ static void intel_dp_adjust_compliance_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, @@ -1860,16 +1843,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, pipe_config->has_audio = intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_ON; if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode) { - struct drm_display_mode *panel_mode = - intel_connector->panel.alt_fixed_mode; - struct drm_display_mode *req_mode = &pipe_config->base.mode; - - if (!intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(req_mode, panel_mode)) - panel_mode = intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode; - - drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(panel_mode); - - intel_fixed_panel_mode(panel_mode, adjusted_mode); + intel_fixed_panel_mode(intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode, + adjusted_mode); if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) { int ret; @@ -6159,7 +6134,6 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base; struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = NULL; - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode = NULL; struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode = NULL; bool has_dpcd; struct drm_display_mode *scan; @@ -6214,14 +6188,13 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, } intel_connector->edid = edid; - /* prefer fixed mode from EDID if available, save an alt mode also */ + /* prefer fixed mode from EDID if available */ list_for_each_entry(scan, &connector->probed_modes, head) { if ((scan->type & DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED)) { fixed_mode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, scan); downclock_mode = intel_dp_drrs_init( intel_connector, fixed_mode); - } else if (!alt_fixed_mode) { - alt_fixed_mode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, scan); + break; } } @@ -6258,8 +6231,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, pipe_name(pipe)); } - intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, alt_fixed_mode, - downclock_mode); + intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, downclock_mode); intel_connector->panel.backlight.power = intel_edp_backlight_power; intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, pipe); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index d7dbca1aabff..0361130500a6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ struct intel_encoder { struct intel_panel { struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode; - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode; struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode; /* backlight */ @@ -1850,7 +1849,6 @@ void intel_overlay_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); /* intel_panel.c */ int intel_panel_init(struct intel_panel *panel, struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode, struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode); void intel_panel_fini(struct intel_panel *panel); void intel_fixed_panel_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c index 51a1d6868b1e..cf39ca90d887 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c @@ -1846,7 +1846,7 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) connector->display_info.width_mm = fixed_mode->width_mm; connector->display_info.height_mm = fixed_mode->height_mm; - intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL, NULL); + intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL); intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE); intel_dsi_add_properties(intel_connector); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c index eb0c559b2715..a70d767313aa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ void intel_dvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) */ intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, intel_dvo_get_current_mode(intel_encoder), - NULL, NULL); + NULL); intel_dvo->panel_wants_dither = true; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c index 8691c86f579c..d8ece907ff54 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c @@ -1140,8 +1140,7 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) out: mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); - intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL, - downclock_mode); + intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, downclock_mode); intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE); lvds_encoder->is_dual_link = compute_is_dual_link_lvds(lvds_encoder); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c index 41d00b1603e3..b443278e569c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c @@ -1928,13 +1928,11 @@ intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_panel *panel) int intel_panel_init(struct intel_panel *panel, struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode, struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode) { intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(panel); panel->fixed_mode = fixed_mode; - panel->alt_fixed_mode = alt_fixed_mode; panel->downclock_mode = downclock_mode; return 0; @@ -1948,10 +1946,6 @@ void intel_panel_fini(struct intel_panel *panel) if (panel->fixed_mode) drm_mode_destroy(intel_connector->base.dev, panel->fixed_mode); - if (panel->alt_fixed_mode) - drm_mode_destroy(intel_connector->base.dev, - panel->alt_fixed_mode); - if (panel->downclock_mode) drm_mode_destroy(intel_connector->base.dev, panel->downclock_mode);

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if" failed to apply to 4.17-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.17-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 368b554d63948133aca05e63ff8f5f4fbc2804d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:01:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available." This reverts commit dc911f5bd8aacfcf8aabd5c26c88e04c837a938e. Per the report, no matter what display mode you select with xrandr, the i915 driver will always select the alternate fixed mode. For the reporter this means that the display will always run at 40Hz which is quite annoying. This may be due to the mode comparison. But there are some other potential issues. The choice of alt_fixed_mode seems dubious. It's the first non-preferred mode, but there are no guarantees that the only difference would be refresh rate. Similarly, there may be more than one preferred mode in the probed modes list, and the commit changes the preferred mode selection to choose the last one on the list instead of the first. (Note that the probed modes list is the raw, unfiltered, unsorted list of modes from drm_add_edid_modes(), not the pretty result after a drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes() call.) Finally, we already have eerily similar code in place to find the downclock mode for DRRS that seems like could be reused here. Back to the drawing board. Note: This is a hand-crafted revert due to conflicts. If it fails to backport, please just try reverting the original commit directly. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105469 Reported-by: Rune Petersen <rune(a)megahurts.dk> Reported-by: Mark Spencer <n7u4722r35(a)ynzlx.anonbox.net> Fixes: dc911f5bd8aa ("drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available.") Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor(a)intel.com> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni(a)intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+ Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan(a)intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180516080110.22770-1-jani.n… (cherry picked from commit d93fa1b47b8fcd149b5091f18385304f402a8e15) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula(a)intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index dde92e4af5d3..8320f0e8e3be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -1679,23 +1679,6 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, return bpp; } -static bool intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(struct drm_display_mode *m1, - struct drm_display_mode *m2) -{ - bool bres = false; - - if (m1 && m2) - bres = (m1->hdisplay == m2->hdisplay && - m1->hsync_start == m2->hsync_start && - m1->hsync_end == m2->hsync_end && - m1->htotal == m2->htotal && - m1->vdisplay == m2->vdisplay && - m1->vsync_start == m2->vsync_start && - m1->vsync_end == m2->vsync_end && - m1->vtotal == m2->vtotal); - return bres; -} - /* Adjust link config limits based on compliance test requests. */ static void intel_dp_adjust_compliance_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, @@ -1860,16 +1843,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, pipe_config->has_audio = intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_ON; if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode) { - struct drm_display_mode *panel_mode = - intel_connector->panel.alt_fixed_mode; - struct drm_display_mode *req_mode = &pipe_config->base.mode; - - if (!intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(req_mode, panel_mode)) - panel_mode = intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode; - - drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(panel_mode); - - intel_fixed_panel_mode(panel_mode, adjusted_mode); + intel_fixed_panel_mode(intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode, + adjusted_mode); if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) { int ret; @@ -6159,7 +6134,6 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base; struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = NULL; - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode = NULL; struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode = NULL; bool has_dpcd; struct drm_display_mode *scan; @@ -6214,14 +6188,13 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, } intel_connector->edid = edid; - /* prefer fixed mode from EDID if available, save an alt mode also */ + /* prefer fixed mode from EDID if available */ list_for_each_entry(scan, &connector->probed_modes, head) { if ((scan->type & DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED)) { fixed_mode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, scan); downclock_mode = intel_dp_drrs_init( intel_connector, fixed_mode); - } else if (!alt_fixed_mode) { - alt_fixed_mode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, scan); + break; } } @@ -6258,8 +6231,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, pipe_name(pipe)); } - intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, alt_fixed_mode, - downclock_mode); + intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, downclock_mode); intel_connector->panel.backlight.power = intel_edp_backlight_power; intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, pipe); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index d7dbca1aabff..0361130500a6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ struct intel_encoder { struct intel_panel { struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode; - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode; struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode; /* backlight */ @@ -1850,7 +1849,6 @@ void intel_overlay_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); /* intel_panel.c */ int intel_panel_init(struct intel_panel *panel, struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode, struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode); void intel_panel_fini(struct intel_panel *panel); void intel_fixed_panel_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c index 51a1d6868b1e..cf39ca90d887 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c @@ -1846,7 +1846,7 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) connector->display_info.width_mm = fixed_mode->width_mm; connector->display_info.height_mm = fixed_mode->height_mm; - intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL, NULL); + intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL); intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE); intel_dsi_add_properties(intel_connector); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c index eb0c559b2715..a70d767313aa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ void intel_dvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) */ intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, intel_dvo_get_current_mode(intel_encoder), - NULL, NULL); + NULL); intel_dvo->panel_wants_dither = true; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c index 8691c86f579c..d8ece907ff54 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c @@ -1140,8 +1140,7 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) out: mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); - intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL, - downclock_mode); + intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, downclock_mode); intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE); lvds_encoder->is_dual_link = compute_is_dual_link_lvds(lvds_encoder); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c index 41d00b1603e3..b443278e569c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c @@ -1928,13 +1928,11 @@ intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_panel *panel) int intel_panel_init(struct intel_panel *panel, struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode, - struct drm_display_mode *alt_fixed_mode, struct drm_display_mode *downclock_mode) { intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(panel); panel->fixed_mode = fixed_mode; - panel->alt_fixed_mode = alt_fixed_mode; panel->downclock_mode = downclock_mode; return 0; @@ -1948,10 +1946,6 @@ void intel_panel_fini(struct intel_panel *panel) if (panel->fixed_mode) drm_mode_destroy(intel_connector->base.dev, panel->fixed_mode); - if (panel->alt_fixed_mode) - drm_mode_destroy(intel_connector->base.dev, - panel->alt_fixed_mode); - if (panel->downclock_mode) drm_mode_destroy(intel_connector->base.dev, panel->downclock_mode);

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From daeb725e919c0d2d4b628aeaa1fa053125f888b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:49:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently setting our pointer to NULL. Fixes: 995d30477496 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r(a)intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+ Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@… diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 2d53f7398a6d..69a5b276f4d8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -775,53 +775,59 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = - container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; - struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; - enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + struct intel_dp *intel_dp; + i915_reg_t reg; + u32 mask; + int err; + + intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + if (!intel_dp) + return false; - /* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable - * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. - * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled - * and be ready for re-enable. - */ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) { if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR_STATUS, - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe), - VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS, - 0, - 1)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + struct drm_crtc *crtc = + dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; + enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + + reg = VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe); + mask = VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS; } + + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + err = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, 0, 50); + if (err) + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); + + /* After the unlocked wait, verify that PSR is still wanted! */ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); - intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled; +} - if (!intel_dp) +static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = + container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); + + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + /* + * We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable + * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. + * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled + * and be ready for re-enable. + */ + if (!psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) goto unlock; /* @@ -832,7 +838,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) goto unlock; - intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); + intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled); unlock: mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); }

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From daeb725e919c0d2d4b628aeaa1fa053125f888b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:49:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently setting our pointer to NULL. Fixes: 995d30477496 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r(a)intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+ Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@… diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 2d53f7398a6d..69a5b276f4d8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -775,53 +775,59 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = - container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; - struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; - enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + struct intel_dp *intel_dp; + i915_reg_t reg; + u32 mask; + int err; + + intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + if (!intel_dp) + return false; - /* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable - * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. - * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled - * and be ready for re-enable. - */ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) { if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR_STATUS, - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe), - VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS, - 0, - 1)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + struct drm_crtc *crtc = + dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; + enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + + reg = VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe); + mask = VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS; } + + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + err = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, 0, 50); + if (err) + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); + + /* After the unlocked wait, verify that PSR is still wanted! */ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); - intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled; +} - if (!intel_dp) +static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = + container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); + + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + /* + * We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable + * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. + * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled + * and be ready for re-enable. + */ + if (!psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) goto unlock; /* @@ -832,7 +838,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) goto unlock; - intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); + intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled); unlock: mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); }

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From daeb725e919c0d2d4b628aeaa1fa053125f888b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:49:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently setting our pointer to NULL. Fixes: 995d30477496 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r(a)intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+ Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@… diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 2d53f7398a6d..69a5b276f4d8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -775,53 +775,59 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = - container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; - struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; - enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + struct intel_dp *intel_dp; + i915_reg_t reg; + u32 mask; + int err; + + intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + if (!intel_dp) + return false; - /* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable - * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. - * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled - * and be ready for re-enable. - */ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) { if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR_STATUS, - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe), - VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS, - 0, - 1)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + struct drm_crtc *crtc = + dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; + enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + + reg = VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe); + mask = VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS; } + + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + err = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, 0, 50); + if (err) + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); + + /* After the unlocked wait, verify that PSR is still wanted! */ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); - intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled; +} - if (!intel_dp) +static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = + container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); + + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + /* + * We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable + * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. + * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled + * and be ready for re-enable. + */ + if (!psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) goto unlock; /* @@ -832,7 +838,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) goto unlock; - intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); + intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled); unlock: mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); }

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock" failed to apply to 4.17-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.17-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From daeb725e919c0d2d4b628aeaa1fa053125f888b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:49:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Chase psr.enabled only under the psr.lock Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently setting our pointer to NULL. Fixes: 995d30477496 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r(a)intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+ Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@… diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 2d53f7398a6d..69a5b276f4d8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -775,53 +775,59 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = - container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; - struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; - enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + struct intel_dp *intel_dp; + i915_reg_t reg; + u32 mask; + int err; + + intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + if (!intel_dp) + return false; - /* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable - * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. - * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled - * and be ready for re-enable. - */ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) { if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS, - EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - EDP_PSR_STATUS, - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, - 0, - 50)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK; } } else { - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, - VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe), - VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS, - 0, - 1)) { - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); - return; - } + struct drm_crtc *crtc = + dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; + enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe; + + reg = VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe); + mask = VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS; } + + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + err = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, 0, 50); + if (err) + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n"); + + /* After the unlocked wait, verify that PSR is still wanted! */ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); - intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled; + return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled; +} - if (!intel_dp) +static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = + container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work); + + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); + + /* + * We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable + * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle. + * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled + * and be ready for re-enable. + */ + if (!psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) goto unlock; /* @@ -832,7 +838,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) goto unlock; - intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); + intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled); unlock: mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); }

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Revert "drm/amd/display: fix dereferencing possible" failed to apply to 4.17-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.17-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 642ad57058baaa2c105925a75c153bb486877513 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland(a)amd.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:51:51 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "drm/amd/display: fix dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This reverts commit cd2d6c92a8e39d7e50a5af9fcc67d07e6a89e91d. Cc: Shirish S <shirish.s(a)amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 265f0166f688..0c29f3b97398 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c @@ -4941,9 +4941,6 @@ static int dm_atomic_check_plane_state_fb(struct drm_atomic_state *state, return -EDEADLK; crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(plane_state->state, crtc); - if (IS_ERR(crtc_state)) - return PTR_ERR(crtc_state); - if (crtc->primary == plane && crtc_state->active) { if (!plane_state->fb) return -EINVAL;

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror