On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:56:47 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:07:03 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
From: Heiner Kallweit hkallweit1@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 1e1d6582f483a4dba4ea03445e6f2f05d9de5bcf ]
If FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER is set then bit SMBAUXCTL_E32B is supported and there's no benefit in reading it back. Origin of this check seems to be 14 yrs ago when people were not completely sure which chip versions support the block buffer mode.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit hkallweit1@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare jdelvare@suse.de Tested-by: Jean Delvare jdelvare@suse.de Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang wsa@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: c1c9d0f6f7f1 ("i2c: i801: Fix block process call transactions")
There is no functional dependency between these 2 commits. The context change which causes the second commit to fail to apply without the first commit is trivial to fix. I can provide a patch for version 5.15 and older. I think it is preferable to backporting an extra patch which wouldn't otherwise qualify for stable trees.
This is already in a released kernel. We can revert them, if you want us to, is it worth it?
Oops, I'm just back from vacation and did not realize this was already released. Let it be then, no big deal.