From: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit 92c48950b43f4a767388cf87709d8687151a641f ]
This patch fixes the following message which randomly pops up during glocktop call:
seq_file: buggy .next function table_seq_next did not update position index
The issue is that seq_read_iter() in fs/seq_file.c also needs an increment of the index in an non next record case as well which this patch fixes otherwise seq_read_iter() will print out the above message.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Teigland teigland@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/dlm/debug_fs.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c index eea64912c9c0..3b79c0284a30 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c +++ b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c @@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ static void *table_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *iter_ptr, loff_t *pos)
if (bucket >= ls->ls_rsbtbl_size) { kfree(ri); + ++*pos; return NULL; } tree = toss ? &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].toss : &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].keep;