6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Huaisheng Ye huaisheng.ye@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 76467a94810c2aa4dd3096903291ac6df30c399e ]
The cxl_port_setup_targets() algorithm fails to identify valid target list ordering in the presence of 4-way and above switches resulting in 'cxl create-region' failures of the form:
$ cxl create-region -d decoder0.0 -g 1024 -s 2G -t ram -w 8 -m mem4 mem1 mem6 mem3 mem2 mem5 mem7 mem0 cxl region: create_region: region0: failed to set target7 to mem0 cxl region: cmd_create_region: created 0 regions
[kernel debug message] check_last_peer:1213: cxl region0: pci0000:0c:port1: cannot host mem6:decoder7.0 at 2 bus_remove_device:574: bus: 'cxl': remove device region0
QEMU can create this failing topology:
ACPI0017:00 [root0] | HB_0 [port1] / \ RP_0 RP_1 | | USP [port2] USP [port3] / / \ \ / / \ \ DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP | | | | | | | | mem4 mem6 mem2 mem7 mem1 mem3 mem5 mem0 Pos: 0 2 4 6 1 3 5 7
HB: Host Bridge RP: Root Port USP: Upstream Port DSP: Downstream Port
...with the following command steps:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -machine q35,cxl=on,accel=tcg \ -smp cpus=8 \ -m 8G \ -hda /home/work/vm-images/centos-stream8-02.qcow2 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m0 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m1 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem0 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem1 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem2 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem3 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem4 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem5 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem6 \ -object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,id=cxl-mem7 \ -numa node,memdev=m0,cpus=0-3,nodeid=0 \ -numa node,memdev=m1,cpus=4-7,nodeid=1 \ -netdev user,id=net0,hostfwd=tcp::2222-:22 \ -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=net0 \ -device pxb-cxl,bus_nr=12,bus=pcie.0,id=cxl.1 \ -device cxl-rp,port=0,bus=cxl.1,id=root_port0,chassis=0,slot=0 \ -device cxl-rp,port=1,bus=cxl.1,id=root_port1,chassis=0,slot=1 \ -device cxl-upstream,bus=root_port0,id=us0 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=0,bus=us0,id=swport0,chassis=0,slot=4 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport0,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem0,id=cxl-vmem0 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=1,bus=us0,id=swport1,chassis=0,slot=5 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport1,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem1,id=cxl-vmem1 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=2,bus=us0,id=swport2,chassis=0,slot=6 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport2,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem2,id=cxl-vmem2 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=3,bus=us0,id=swport3,chassis=0,slot=7 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport3,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem3,id=cxl-vmem3 \ -device cxl-upstream,bus=root_port1,id=us1 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=4,bus=us1,id=swport4,chassis=0,slot=8 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport4,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem4,id=cxl-vmem4 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=5,bus=us1,id=swport5,chassis=0,slot=9 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport5,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem5,id=cxl-vmem5 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=6,bus=us1,id=swport6,chassis=0,slot=10 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport6,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem6,id=cxl-vmem6 \ -device cxl-downstream,port=7,bus=us1,id=swport7,chassis=0,slot=11 \ -device cxl-type3,bus=swport7,volatile-memdev=cxl-mem7,id=cxl-vmem7 \ -M cxl-fmw.0.targets.0=cxl.1,cxl-fmw.0.size=32G &
In Guest OS: $ cxl create-region -d decoder0.0 -g 1024 -s 2G -t ram -w 8 -m mem4 mem1 mem6 mem3 mem2 mem5 mem7 mem0
Fix the method to calculate @distance by iterativeley multiplying the number of targets per switch port. This also follows the algorithm recommended here [1].
Fixes: 27b3f8d13830 ("cxl/region: Program target lists") Link: http://lore.kernel.org/6538824b52349_7258329466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.no... [1] Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye huaisheng.ye@intel.com Tested-by: Li Zhijian lizhijian@fujitsu.com [djbw: add a comment explaining 'distance'] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/173378716722.1270362.9546805175813426729.stgit@dwil... Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang dave.jiang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c index dff618c708dc..a0d6e8d7f42c 100644 --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c @@ -1295,6 +1295,7 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_region_params *p = &cxlr->params; struct cxl_decoder *cxld = cxl_rr->decoder; struct cxl_switch_decoder *cxlsd; + struct cxl_port *iter = port; u16 eig, peig; u8 eiw, peiw;
@@ -1311,16 +1312,26 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
cxlsd = to_cxl_switch_decoder(&cxld->dev); if (cxl_rr->nr_targets_set) { - int i, distance; + int i, distance = 1; + struct cxl_region_ref *cxl_rr_iter;
/* - * Passthrough decoders impose no distance requirements between - * peers + * The "distance" between peer downstream ports represents which + * endpoint positions in the region interleave a given port can + * host. + * + * For example, at the root of a hierarchy the distance is + * always 1 as every index targets a different host-bridge. At + * each subsequent switch level those ports map every Nth region + * position where N is the width of the switch == distance. */ - if (cxl_rr->nr_targets == 1) - distance = 0; - else - distance = p->nr_targets / cxl_rr->nr_targets; + do { + cxl_rr_iter = cxl_rr_load(iter, cxlr); + distance *= cxl_rr_iter->nr_targets; + iter = to_cxl_port(iter->dev.parent); + } while (!is_cxl_root(iter)); + distance *= cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.interleave_ways; + for (i = 0; i < cxl_rr->nr_targets_set; i++) if (ep->dport == cxlsd->target[i]) { rc = check_last_peer(cxled, ep, cxl_rr,