6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com
commit 0340dc4c82590d8735c58cf904a8aa1173273ab5 upstream.
Restrict interrupt timestamp alignment for not overflowing max/min period thresholds.
Fixes: 0ecc363ccea7 ("iio: make invensense timestamp module generic") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240426135814.141837-1-inv.git-commit@tdk.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/iio/common/inv_sensors/inv_sensors_timestamp.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iio/common/inv_sensors/inv_sensors_timestamp.c +++ b/drivers/iio/common/inv_sensors/inv_sensors_timestamp.c @@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ static bool inv_update_chip_period(struc
static void inv_align_timestamp_it(struct inv_sensors_timestamp *ts) { + const int64_t period_min = ts->min_period * ts->mult; + const int64_t period_max = ts->max_period * ts->mult; + int64_t add_max, sub_max; int64_t delta, jitter; int64_t adjust;
@@ -112,11 +115,13 @@ static void inv_align_timestamp_it(struc delta = ts->it.lo - ts->timestamp;
/* adjust timestamp while respecting jitter */ + add_max = period_max - (int64_t)ts->period; + sub_max = period_min - (int64_t)ts->period; jitter = INV_SENSORS_TIMESTAMP_JITTER((int64_t)ts->period, ts->chip.jitter); if (delta > jitter) - adjust = jitter; + adjust = add_max; else if (delta < -jitter) - adjust = -jitter; + adjust = sub_max; else adjust = 0;