27 Mar
2023
27 Mar
'23
4:23 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 at 16:54, Wolfram Sang wsa@kernel.org wrote:
For the !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT case, preemptible() is defined 0. So, don't we lose the irqs_disabled() check in that case?
Thanks for the feedback! PREEMPT_COUNT is selected by PREEMPTION, so I guess in the case of !PREEMPT_COUNT, we should be atomic (anyways)?