On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:13:21PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
Hi,
maybe you will not like introducing 'static int int_max = INT_MAX;' for this old kernel which EOL in 10 months.
That's fine, not a big deal :)
Thanks for a quick info. I guess this is a reply to my question about SYSCTL_NEG_ONE failure on missing SYSCTL_NEG_ONE. Therefore I'll create static int __maybe_unused neg_one = -1; (which was used before 78e36f3b0dae).
Great.
Cyril Hrubis (3): sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us
kernel/sched/rt.c | 10 +++++----- kernel/sysctl.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thanks for the patches, but they all got connected into the same thread, making it impossible to detect which ones are for what branches :(
Can you put the version in the [PATCH X/Y] section like [PATCH 4.14 X/Y] or just make separate threads so we have a chance?
I'm sorry, I'll resent all patches properly.
No worries, the second round looks good. I'll queue them up after this latest set of stable kernels goes out in a few days.
thanks!
greg k-h