6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikita Zhandarovich n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru
[ Upstream commit b5c5baa458faa5430c445acd9a17481274d77ccf ]
It may be possible, albeit unlikely, to encounter integer overflow during the multiplication of several unsigned int variables, the result being assigned to a variable 'size' of wider type.
Prevent this potential behaviour by converting one of the multiples to unsigned long.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: 0242f74d29df ("drm/radeon: clean up CS functions in r100.c") Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c index affa9e0309b2..cfeca2694d5f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ int r100_cs_track_check(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_cs_track *track) switch (prim_walk) { case 1: for (i = 0; i < track->num_arrays; i++) { - size = track->arrays[i].esize * track->max_indx * 4; + size = track->arrays[i].esize * track->max_indx * 4UL; if (track->arrays[i].robj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("(PW %u) Vertex array %u no buffer " "bound\n", prim_walk, i); @@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ int r100_cs_track_check(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_cs_track *track) break; case 2: for (i = 0; i < track->num_arrays; i++) { - size = track->arrays[i].esize * (nverts - 1) * 4; + size = track->arrays[i].esize * (nverts - 1) * 4UL; if (track->arrays[i].robj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("(PW %u) Vertex array %u no buffer " "bound\n", prim_walk, i);