On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 07:54:45PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:43:25PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
… So they should also use dev_hold() to increase the
refcnt of skb->dev.
…
reference counter of “skb->dev”?
Yes, I will update my wording.
Would you like to improve such a change description also with imperative wordings? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
How do you think about the text “Prevent use-after-free issues at more places” for a summary phrase?
Thanks for your suggestion. I will update the wording in next version.
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot