On Sun 16-02-20 09:52:49, Yafang Shao wrote:
memory.{emin, elow} are set in mem_cgroup_protected(), and the values of them won't be changed until next recalculation in this function. After either or both of them are set, the next reclaimer to relcaim this memcg may be a different reclaimer, e.g. this memcg is also the root memcg of the new reclaimer, and then in mem_cgroup_protection() in get_scan_count() the old values of them will be used to calculate scan count, that is not proper. We should reset them to zero in this case.
Here's an example of this issue.
root_mem_cgroup / A memory.max=1024M memory.min=512M memory.current=800MOnce kswapd is waked up, it will try to scan all MEMCGs, including this A, and it will assign memory.emin of A with 512M. After that, A may reach its hard limit(memory.max), and then it will do memcg reclaim. Because A is the root of this reclaimer, so it will not calculate its memory.emin. So the memory.emin is the old value 512M, and then this old value will be used in mem_cgroup_protection() in get_scan_count() to get the scan count. That is not proper.
Please document user visible effects of this patch. What does it mean that this is not proper behavior? What happens if we have concurrent reclaimers at different levels of the hierarchy how that would affect the resulting protection?
Fixes: 9783aa9917f8 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao laoar.shao@gmail.com Acked-by: Roman Gushchin guro@fb.com Cc: Chris Down chris@chrisdown.name Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
mm/memcontrol.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 6f6dc8712e39..df7fedbfc211 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -6250,8 +6250,17 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root, if (!root) root = root_mem_cgroup;
- if (memcg == root)
- if (memcg == root) {
/** Reset memory.(emin, elow) for reclaiming the memcg* itself.*/if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup) {memcg->memory.emin = 0;memcg->memory.elow = 0;}- }
usage = page_counter_read(&memcg->memory); if (!usage) -- 2.14.1