On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
@@ -2251,7 +2261,16 @@ static void enetc_disable_txbdr(struct enetc_hw *hw, struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring) enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBMR, 0); } -static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) +static void enetc_disable_rx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) +{
- struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw;
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]);+}
+static void enetc_disable_tx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) { struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw; int i; @@ -2259,8 +2278,6 @@ static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++) enetc_disable_txbdr(hw, priv->tx_ring[i]);
Please do not leave a blank line here. In the git tree after applying this patch, that blank line appears at the end of enetc_disable_tx_bdrs().
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]);}