[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 86de848403abda05bf9c16dcdb6bef65a8d88c41
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: Leah Rumancikleah.rumancik@gmail.com Commit author: Christoph Hellwighch@lst.de
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: c299188b443a)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: 86de848403abd ! 1: 17fd2403176bf xfs: remove a racy if_bytes check in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## xfs: remove a racy if_bytes check in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent
+ [ Upstream commit 86de848403abda05bf9c16dcdb6bef65a8d88c41 ] + Accessing if_bytes without the ilock is racy. Remove the initial if_bytes == 0 check in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent and let ext_iext_lookup_extent fail for this case after we've taken the ilock. @@ Commit message Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" djwong@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R chandanbabu@kernel.org + Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik leah.rumancik@gmail.com + Acked-by: "Darrick J. Wong" djwong@kernel.org
## fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c ## @@ fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c: xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent( ---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.6.y | Success | Success |