On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:23:49AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
Hi Naresh,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release. There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
NOTE: clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64, i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc.
include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in '__builtin_offsetof' __field_struct(initcall_t, func) ^ include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant __field_struct(initcall_t, func) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round of stable updates.
https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
Hopefully it will be cleared up next round.
Yes, I will get to them after these are released, I figured it wasn't that big of a rush...
thanks,
greg k-h