On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:55:35PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
On Mon Dec 09 19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:55:20AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
On Sun Dec 01 19, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 11/29/19 5:37 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 08:17:51AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
From: Stefan Berger stefanb@linux.ibm.com
Revert the patches that were fixing the probing of interrupts due to reports of interrupt stroms on some systems
Can you explain how reverting is going to fix the issue?
The reverts fix 'the interrupt storm issue' that they are causing on some systems but don't fix the issue with the interrupt mode not being used. I was hoping Jerry would get access to a system faster but this didn't seem to be the case. So sending these patches seemed the better solution than leaving 5.4.x with the problem but going back to when it worked 'better.'
I finally heard back from IT support, and unfortunately they don't have any T490s systems to give out on temp loan. So I can only send patched kernels to the end user that had the problem.
At least it is a fact that tpm_chip_stop() is called too early and that is destined to cause issues.
Should I bake a patch or do you have already something?
/Jarkko
This is what I'm currently building:
With a quick skim looks what I had in mind.
/Jarkko