6.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Hölzl alexander.hoelzl@gmx.net
[ Upstream commit b6ec62e01aa4229bc9d3861d1073806767ea7838 ]
The description of PDU1 format usage mistakenly referred to PDU2 format.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Hölzl alexander.hoelzl@gmx.net Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel o.rempel@pengutronix.de Acked-by: Vincent Mailhol mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241023145257.82709-1-alexander.hoelzl@gmx.net Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde mkl@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- Documentation/networking/j1939.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/j1939.rst b/Documentation/networking/j1939.rst index e4bd7aa1f5aa9..544bad175aae2 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/j1939.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/j1939.rst @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ format, the Group Extension is set in the PS-field.
On the other hand, when using PDU1 format, the PS-field contains a so-called Destination Address, which is _not_ part of the PGN. When communicating a PGN -from user space to kernel (or vice versa) and PDU2 format is used, the PS-field +from user space to kernel (or vice versa) and PDU1 format is used, the PS-field of the PGN shall be set to zero. The Destination Address shall be set elsewhere.