On Thursday, 13 March 2025, 01:46:43 CET, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 2:18 AM Christian Eggers ceggers@arri.de wrote:
@@ -2213,6 +2221,8 @@ struct regulator *_regulator_get_common(struct regulator_dev *rdev, struct devic */ dev_warn(dev, "supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n", id); rdev = dummy_regulator_rdev;
if (!rdev)
return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
nit: it feels like the dev_warn() above should be below your new check. Otherwise you'll get the same message again after the deferral processes.
I actually had a similar feeling during making the change. Having entropy on warning messages isn't very nice, so I'll send a v3.
regards Christian