6.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com
commit d4e89d212d401672e9cdfe825d947ee3a9fbe3f5 upstream.
Classic BPF programs have been identified as potential vectors for intra-mode Branch Target Injection (BTI) attacks. Classic BPF programs can be run by unprivileged users. They allow unprivileged code to execute inside the kernel. Attackers can use unprivileged cBPF to craft branch history in kernel mode that can influence the target of indirect branches.
Introduce a branch history buffer (BHB) clearing sequence during the JIT compilation of classic BPF programs. The clearing sequence is the same as is used in previous mitigations to protect syscalls. Since eBPF programs already have their own mitigations in place, only insert the call on classic programs that aren't run by privileged users.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre alexandre.chartre@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1450,6 +1450,30 @@ static void emit_priv_frame_ptr(u8 **ppr #define PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ 8 #define PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL 0xEB9F12345678eb9fULL
+static int emit_spectre_bhb_barrier(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip, + struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog) +{ + u8 *prog = *pprog; + u8 *func; + + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP)) { + /* The clearing sequence clobbers eax and ecx. */ + EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */ + EMIT1(0x51); /* push rcx */ + ip += 2; + + func = (u8 *)clear_bhb_loop; + ip += x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, func, ip); + + if (emit_call(&prog, func, ip)) + return -EINVAL; + EMIT1(0x59); /* pop rcx */ + EMIT1(0x58); /* pop rax */ + } + *pprog = prog; + return 0; +} + static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image, int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx, bool jmp_padding) { @@ -2467,6 +2491,13 @@ emit_jmp: seen_exit = true; /* Update cleanup_addr */ ctx->cleanup_addr = proglen; + if (bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog) && + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) { + u8 *ip = image + addrs[i - 1]; + + if (emit_spectre_bhb_barrier(&prog, ip, bpf_prog)) + return -EINVAL; + } if (bpf_prog->aux->exception_boundary) { pop_callee_regs(&prog, all_callee_regs_used); pop_r12(&prog);