From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
commit bb7262b295472eb6858b5c49893954794027cd84 upstream.
syzbot reported KCSAN data races vs. timer_base::timer_running being set to NULL without holding base::lock in expire_timers().
This looks innocent and most reads are clearly not problematic, but Frederic identified an issue which is:
int data = 0;
void timer_func(struct timer_list *t) { data = 1; }
CPU 0 CPU 1 ------------------------------ -------------------------- base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags); raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock); if (base->running_timer != timer) call_timer_fn(timer, fn, baseclk); ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true); base->running_timer = NULL; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags); raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
x = data;
If the timer has previously executed on CPU 1 and then CPU 0 can observe base->running_timer == NULL and returns, assuming the timer has completed, but it's not guaranteed on all architectures. The comment for del_timer_sync() makes that guarantee. Moving the assignment under base->lock prevents this.
For non-RT kernel it's performance wise completely irrelevant whether the store happens before or after taking the lock. For an RT kernel moving the store under the lock requires an extra unlock/lock pair in the case that there is a waiter for the timer, but that's not the end of the world.
Reported-by: syzbot+aa7c2385d46c5eba0b89@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+abea4558531bae1ba9fe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 030dcdd197d7 ("timers: Prepare support for PREEMPT_RT") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bigeasy@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfea7gw8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/time/timer.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c @@ -1269,8 +1269,10 @@ static inline void timer_base_unlock_exp static void timer_sync_wait_running(struct timer_base *base) { if (atomic_read(&base->timer_waiters)) { + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock); spin_unlock(&base->expiry_lock); spin_lock(&base->expiry_lock); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&base->lock); } }
@@ -1454,14 +1456,14 @@ static void expire_timers(struct timer_b if (timer->flags & TIMER_IRQSAFE) { raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock); call_timer_fn(timer, fn, baseclk); - base->running_timer = NULL; raw_spin_lock(&base->lock); + base->running_timer = NULL; } else { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock); call_timer_fn(timer, fn, baseclk); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&base->lock); base->running_timer = NULL; timer_sync_wait_running(base); - raw_spin_lock_irq(&base->lock); } } }