6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Henry Martin bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 73b24dc731731edf762f9454552cb3a5b7224949 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com Acked-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c index f2d913a91be9e..a191d9bdf667a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c @@ -29,9 +29,16 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
static unsigned int scpi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) { - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); - struct scpi_data *priv = policy->driver_data; - unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk); + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct scpi_data *priv; + unsigned long rate; + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); + if (unlikely(!policy)) + return 0; + + priv = policy->driver_data; + rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
return rate / 1000; }