From: Akira Yokosawa akiyks@gmail.com
commit 6d5aa418b3bd42cdccc36e94ee199af423ef7c84 upstream.
The reference to `explicit_in_reply_to` is pointless as when the reference was added in the form of "#15" [1], Section 15) was "The canonical patch format". The reference of "#15" had not been properly updated in a couple of reorganizations during the plain-text SubmittingPatches era.
Fix it by using `the_canonical_patch_format`.
[1]: 2ae19acaa50a ("Documentation: Add "how to write a good patch summary" to SubmittingPatches")
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa akiyks@gmail.com Fixes: 5903019b2a5e ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: convert it to ReST markup") Fixes: 9b2c76777acc ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: enrich the Sphinx output") Cc: Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mchehab@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.9+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/64e105a5-50be-23f2-6cae-903a2ea98e18@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ as you intend it to.
The maintainer will thank you if you write your patch description in a form which can be easily pulled into Linux's source code management -system, ``git``, as a "commit log". See :ref:`explicit_in_reply_to`. +system, ``git``, as a "commit log". See :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`.
Solve only one problem per patch. If your description starts to get long, that's a sign that you probably need to split up your patch.