On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:33:49PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org
One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0.
This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YL9HxEc/l0yrl5o8@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4ef57b21d6fb4 ("recordmcount: support >64k sections") Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) rostedt@goodmis.org
This is apperently causing trouble for Stephen in -next. Please hold.