Hello.
On čtvrtek 21. září 2023 9:19:58 CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 07:02:41AM +0200, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
Hello Felix.
On středa 26. července 2023 11:17:02 CEST Felix Fietkau wrote:
The IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_EXT_NSS_BW value already indicates support for half-NSS 160 MHz support, so it is wrong to also advertise full 160 MHz support.
Fixes: c2f73eacee3b ("wifi: mt76: mt7915: add back 160MHz channel width support for MT7915") Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau nbd@nbd.name
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/init.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/init.c index ee976657bfc3..78552f10b377 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/init.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/init.c @@ -414,7 +414,6 @@ mt7915_init_wiphy(struct mt7915_phy *phy) if (!dev->dbdc_support) vht_cap->cap |= IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SHORT_GI_160 |
} else { vht_cap->cap |=IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ | FIELD_PREP(IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_EXT_NSS_BW_MASK, 1);
For some reason this got backported into the stable kernel:
$ git log --oneline v6.5.2..v6.5.4 -- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/ c43017fbebcc3 wifi: mt76: mt7915: fix power-limits while chan_switch edb1afe042c74 wifi: mt76: mt7915: fix tlv length of mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info 9ec0dec0baea3 wifi: mt76: mt7915: remove VHT160 capability on MT7915 0e61f73e6ebc0 wifi: mt76: mt7915: fix capabilities in non-AP mode 6bce28ce28390 wifi: mt76: mt7915: fix command timeout in AP stop period 7af917d4864c6 wifi: mt76: mt7915: rework tx bytes counting when WED is active feae00c6468ce wifi: mt76: mt7915: rework tx packets counting when WED is active 70bbcc4ad6544 wifi: mt76: mt7915: fix background radar event being blocked
and this broke my mt7915-based AP.
However, if I remove `[VT160]` capability from the hostapd config, things go back to normal. It does seem that 160 MHz still works even.
Is this expected?
Is your device also broken in 6.6-rc2?
Yes, the same behaviour is observed with v6.6-rc2:
``` hostapd[1316]: Configured VHT capability [VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK] exceeds max value supported by the driver (1 > 0) ```
while having `[VT160]` in `vht_capab=`.
Thanks.
thanks,
greg k-h