6.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de
[ Upstream commit 60e02f956d77af31b85ed4e73abf85d5f12d0a98 ]
The top of the function comment is outdated, and the parts still correct duplicate information in comment inside the function. Remove the top of the function comment and instead improve a comment inside the function.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino cem@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: d2845519b072 ("xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c @@ -654,13 +654,6 @@ static inline bool xfs_zoned_pack_tight( !(ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND); }
-/* - * Pick a new zone for writes. - * - * If we aren't using up our budget of open zones just open a new one from the - * freelist. Else try to find one that matches the expected data lifetime. If - * we don't find one that is good pick any zone that is available. - */ static struct xfs_open_zone * xfs_select_zone_nowait( struct xfs_mount *mp, @@ -688,7 +681,8 @@ xfs_select_zone_nowait( goto out_unlock;
/* - * See if we can open a new zone and use that. + * See if we can open a new zone and use that so that data for different + * files is mixed as little as possible. */ oz = xfs_try_open_zone(mp, write_hint); if (oz)